Skip to main content

Adhesive Dentistry

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Adhesion Technology
  • 464 Accesses

Abstract

The present chapter describes the adhesive techniques and materials that are widely used in modern clinical dentistry. There are two types of tooth-colored restorative material available to the dentist, the so-called composite resins and the glass-ionomer cements. There are, though, variations on these basic types, as explained in the chapter. In addition, there is the zinc polycarboxylate cement, which was the first adhesive dental restorative material to be developed, and it retains a niche in modern clinical practice.

Composite resins do not themselves possess any adhesive properties, but need to be used in conjunction with separate adhesive substances known as bonding agents. Over recent years, the technology of these materials has developed rapidly and a wide variety of systems are currently available to the clinician. Bonding agents have been characterized by “generation,” and currently seventh generation bonding systems are available. However, a more useful classification is based on the number of steps involved in using them, and this is described in detail.

Bonding agents are applied to the tooth surface following cavity preparation, a process that involves the formation of a layer of deranged dentin known as the “smear layer.” Modern bonding agents may be either “etch-and-rinse,” in which case the smear layer is removed, or “self-etching,” where the smear layer becomes incorporated into the bonding layer. Whichever approach is used, the result is a treated surface to which the composite resin is applied. Testing of such systems is typically in shear mode, and they have been reported to give high shear bond strengths, even though they involve only a very thin layer between a hydrophilic substrate and a hydrophobic repair material.

Glass-ionomers, by contrast, are themselves hydrophilic and inherently adhesive to the tooth surface. It therefore requires only slight pretreatment, typically conditioning with 10% aqueous polyacrylic acid. Glass-ionomers rapidly form durable adhesive bonds to the tooth surface through the development of an ion-exchange layer at the interface. This ability to bond is exploited in both the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) technique and in bonding of orthodontic brackets, both of which are described in detail in the chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akinmade A, Nicholson JW (1995) Effect of adhesive layer thickness on the bond strength of a zinc polycarboxylate dental cement. Biomaterials 15:149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Ehaideb A, Mohammed H (2000) Hear bond strength of “one-bottle” dentin adhesives. J Prosthet Dent 84:408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antoniazzi BF, Nicolos GF, Lenzi TL, Soares FZM, Rocha RO (2016) Selective acid etching improves the bond strength of universal adhesive to sound and demineralized enamel of primary teeth. J Adhes Dent 18:311

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantley W, Eliades T (2001) Orthodontic materials, scientific and clinical aspects. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Lenarda R, De Stafano DE (2008) Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of bonded surfaces. Dent Mater 24:90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouillaguet S, Wataha JG, Virgillito M, Gonzalez L, Rakich DR, Meyer JM (2000) Effect of sublethal concentrations of HEMA (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) on THP-1 human monocyte macrophages in vitro. Dent Mater 16:213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buonocore MG (1955) A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 34:849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess JO, Norling B, Summit J (1994) Resin ionomer restorative materials: the new generation. J Esthet Dent 6:207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho RM, Manso AP, Geraldeli S, Tay FR, Pashley DH (2012) Durability of bonds and clinical success of adhesive restorations. Dent Mater 28:72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles C (1998) Bonding orthodontic brackets with glass-ionomer cement. Biomaterials 19:589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Hoore WRA, Gonthier S, Degrange M, Dejou J (2001) Reliability of in vitro microleakage test: a literature review. J Adhes Dent 3:295

    Google Scholar 

  • De Munk J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B (2005) A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 118:132

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn JR (2003) iBond ™: the seventh generation, one-bottle dental bonding agent. Compen Cont Dental Educ 24(Suppl 2):14

    Google Scholar 

  • El Kalla IH, Garcia-Godoy F (1998) Bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of four adhesive systems in primary and permanent molars. J Dent Child 65:169

    Google Scholar 

  • Frencken JE, van’t Hof MA, van Amerongen WE, Holmgren CJ (2004) Effectiveness of single-surface ART restorations in the permanent dentition: a meta-analysis. J Dent Res 83:120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frencken JE, Leal SC, Navarro MF (2012) Twenty-five-year atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach: a comprehensive overview. Clin Oral Invest 16:1337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geukins S, Goossens A (2001) Occupational contact allergy to (meth)acrylates. Contact Dermatol 44:153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood NN, Earnshaw A (1984) The chemistry of the elements. Pergamon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamid A, Hume WR (1997) Diffusion of resin monomers through human carious dentin in vitro. J Oral Rehabil 24:20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J (2012) Bonding effectiveness of a new multi-mode adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent 40:475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume WR, Gerzina TM (1996) Bioavailability of components of resin-based materials which are applied to teeth. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 7:172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanca J (1996) Wet bonding: effect of drying time and distance. Am J Dent 9:273

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsumo K, Manabe A, Itoh K, Nakamura Y, Wakumoto S, Hisamitsu H, Yoshida T (1996) Contact dermatitis caused by 2-HEMA and GM dentin primer solutions applied to guinea pigs and humans. Dent Mater J 15:22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd EAM (1976) Microleakage: a review. J Dent 4:199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitayama S, Nikaido T, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, Tagami J (2007) Enamel bonding of self-etch and phosphoric acid-etch orthodontic adhesive systems. Dent Mater J 26:135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koibuchi H, Yasuda N, Nakabayashi N (2001) Bonding to dentin with a self-etching primer: the effect of smear layers. Dent Mater 17:122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzi TL, Soares FZM, Raggio DP, Pereira GKR, Rocha RO (2016) Dry-bond etch-and-rinse strategy improves bond longevity of a universal adhesive to sound and artificially-induced caries-affected primary dentin. J Adhes Dent 18:475

    Google Scholar 

  • Manolea H, Antoniac J, Miculescu M, Rica R, Platon A, Melnicenco R (2016) Variability of the composite resins adhesion with the dental substrate penetration and the used adhesive type. J Adhes Sci Technol 16:1754

    Google Scholar 

  • May KN, Swift JR, Bayne SC (1997) Bond strengths of a new dentin adhesive system. Am J Dent 10:195

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe JF, Walls AWG (2008) Applied dental materials, 9th edn. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean JW, Nicholson JW, Wilson AD (1994) Proposed nomenclature for glass-ionomer cements and related materials. Quintessence Int 25:587

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra SB (1991a) Adhesion to dentin and physical properties of a light-cured glass-ionomer liner/base. J Dent Res 70:72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra SB (1991b) In vitro fluoride release from a light-cured glass-ionomer liner/base. J Dent Res 70:75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mount GJ (1991) Making the most of glass ionomer cements. Dent Update 18:276

    Google Scholar 

  • Mount GJ (1994) A color atlas of glass ionomer cements, 2nd edn. Dunitz, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mount GJ (2002) A color atlas of glass ionomer cements, 3rd edn. Dunitz, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mount GJ, Hume WR (2005) Preservation and restoration of teeth, 2nd edn. Knowledge Books and Software, Middlesbrough

    Google Scholar 

  • Mount GJ, Tyas MJ, Ferracane JL, Nicholson JW, Berg JH, Simonsen RJ, Ngo H (2009) A revised classification for direct tooth-colored restorative materials. Quintessence Int 40:691

    Google Scholar 

  • Munoz M, Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez I, Szesz A, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NH (2013) Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent 41:404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E (1982) The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 16:265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakabayashi N, Saimi Y (1996) Bonding to intact dentin. J Dent Res 75:1706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngo H, Mount GJ, Peters MRCB (1997) A study of glass-ionomer cement and its interface with the enamel and dentin using a low-temperature, high-resolution scanning electron microscope technique. Quintessence Int 28:63

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson JW (2000) Adhesive dental materials and their durability. Int J Adhes Adhes 20:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson JW (2006) Polyacid modified composite resins (“compomers”) and their use in clinical dentistry. Dent Mater 23:615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson JW, Czarnecka B (2008a) Fluoride in dentistry and dental restoratives. In: Tressaud A, Haufe G (eds) Fluorine and health. Elsevier, Amsterdam/Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson JW, Czarnecka B (2008b) Biocompatibility of resin-modified glass-ionomer dental cement. Dent Mater 24:1702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson JW, Czarnecka B (2016) Dental adhesives. In: Materials for the Direct Restoration of Teeth. Woodhead Publishing, Duxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogata M, Harada N, Yamaguchi S, Nakajima M, Periera PN, Tagami J (2001) Effect of different burs on bond strengths of self-etching primer systems. Oper Dent 26:375

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardi V, Periera AC, Mialhe FL, Meneghim MC, Ambrossana GM (2003) A 5-year evaluation of two glass-ionomer cements used as fissure sealants. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 31:386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pashley DH, Carvalho RM (1997) Dentine permeability and dentine adhesive. J Dent 25:355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perdigao J, Kose C, Mena-Serrano AP, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2014) A new universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation. Oper Dent 39:113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2010) Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater 26:1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roulet J-F, Vanherle G (2004) Adhesive technology for restorative dentistry. Quintessence, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Sano H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Horner JA, Matthews JA, Pashley DH (1995) Nanoleakage: leakage within the hybrid layer. Oper Dent 20:18

    Google Scholar 

  • Sezinando A (2014) Looking for the ideal adhesive – a review. Rev Port Estomatol Med Dent Cir Maxillofac 55:194

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith DC (1968) A new dental cement. Br Dent J 125:381

    Google Scholar 

  • Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Endo H, Tsuchiya K, Erikson RL, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2016) Influence of pre-etching times on fatigue strength of self-etch adhesives to enamel. J Adhes Dent 18:501

    Google Scholar 

  • Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SHI (1998) Relation between water content in acetone/alcohol-based primer and interfacial ultrastructure. J Dent 26:147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tay FR, Pashley DH (2001) Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 17:296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tay FR, Pashley DH (2003) Water treeing: a potential mechanism for degradation of dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 16:6

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Duinen RNB, Davidson CL, De Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ (2004) In situ transformation of glass-ionomer into an enamel-like material. Am J Dent 17:223

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (2001) Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry. Oper Dent 26:S119

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U (2014) Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent 42:800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Spencer P (2003) Hybridization efficiency of the adhesive/dentin interface with wet bonding. J Dent Res 82:141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams DF (1987) Definitions in biomaterials. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson AD (1990) Resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. Int J Prosthodont 3:425

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson AD, Kent BE (1972) A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass-ionomer Cement. Br Dent J 132:133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zander-Grande C, Ferreira SQ, da Costa TRF, Loguercio RA (2011) Application of etch-and-rinse adhesives on dry and rewet dentin under rubbing action: a 24-month clinical evaluation. J Am Dent Assoc 142:828

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John W. Nicholson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Nicholson, J.W. (2017). Adhesive Dentistry. In: da Silva, L., Öchsner, A., Adams, R. (eds) Handbook of Adhesion Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42087-5_56-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42087-5_56-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42087-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42087-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics