Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What Is Minimally Invasive Surgery and How Do You Learn It?

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Minimally Invasive Surgery in Orthopedics

  • 147 Accesses

Abstract

Innovation in surgery is not new and should not be unexpected. As an example, the history of total joint replacement has demonstrated continuous evolution, and the relatively high complication rates associated with early prostheses and techniques eventually led to the improvement of implants and refinement of the surgical procedures. Gradual adoption of these improvements and their eventual diffusion into the surgical community led to improved success and increased rates of implantation [1]. Increased surgical experience was eventually accompanied by more rapid surgical performance and then by the development of standardized hospitalization protocols, which eventually led to more rapid rehabilitation and return to function. These benefits are well accepted and can be seen as helping contribute to the establishment of a more “consumer-driven” and medical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Peltier LF. The history of hip surgery. In: Callaghan JJ, Rosenberg AG, Rubash HE, editors. The adult hip. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1998. p. 4–19.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dixon MC, Scott RD, Schai PA, Stamos V. A simple capsulorrhaphy in a posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(3):373–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rogers EM. The diffusion of innovation. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fenton DS, Czervionke LF, editors. Image-guided spine intervention. New York: W B Saunders; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Castaneda-Zuniga WR, Tadavarthy SM, Qia Z. Interventional radiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tuffs A. Kurt Semm Obituary. Br Med J. 2003;(327):397

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dincler S, Koller MT, Steurer J, Bachmann LM, Christen D, Buchmann P. Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: eight-year results. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(10):1371–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gallagher AG, Smith CD, Bowers SP, Seymour NE, Pearson A, McNatt S, Hananel D, Satava RM. Psychomotor skills assessment in practicing surgeons experienced in performing advanced laparoscopic procedures. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197(3):479–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McCormick PH, Tanner WA, Keane FB, Tierney S. Minimally invasive techniques in common surgical procedures: implications for training. Ir J Med Sci. 2003;172(1):27–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Berger RA, Duwelius PJ. The two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35(2):163–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hartzband MA. Posterolateral minimal incision for total hip replacement: technique and early results. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35(2):119–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Howell JR, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Minimally invasive versus standard incision anterolateral hip replacement: a comparative study. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35(2):153–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wright JM, Crockett HC, Delgado S, Lyman S, Madsen M, Sculco TP. Mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, controlled investigation with 5-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(5):538–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF, Lannin JV, Schurman DJ. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86A(7):1353–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Callaghan JJ, Crowninshield RD, Greenwald AS, Lieberman JR, Rosenberg AG, Lewallen DG. Symposium: introducing technology into orthopaedic practice. How should it be done? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(5):1146–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ericsson KA, Charness N, Feltovich PJ, Hoffman RR. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilhelm DM, Ogan K, Roehrborn CG, Cadeddu JA, Pearle MS. Assessment of basic endoscopic performance using a virtual reality simulator. J Urol. 2003;170(2 Pt 1):692.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Amirault RJ, Branson R. Educators and expertise: a brief history of theories and models. In: Ericsson KA, Charness N, Feltovich PJ, Hoffman RR, editors. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. p. 72–4.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhou W, Lin PH, Bush RL, Lumsden AB. Endovascular training of vascular surgeons: have we made progress? Semin Vasc Surg. 2006;19(2):122–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Colt HG, Crawford SW, Galbraith O. Virtual reality bronchoscopy simulation. Chest. 2001;120:1333–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rosser Jr JC, Rosser LE, Savalgi RS. Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery. Arch Surg. 1998;133(6):657–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rogers DA. Ethical and educational considerations in minimally invasive surgery training for practicing surgeons. Semin Laparosc Surg. 2002;9(4):206–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wanzel KR, Hmastra SJ, Anastakis DJ, Matsumoto ED, Cusimano MD. Effect of visuo-spatial ability on learning of spatially-complex surgical skills. Lancet. 2002;38:617–27.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Naik VN, Matsumoto ED, Houston PL, Hamstra SJ, Yeung RY-M, Mallon JS, Martire TM. Fibreoptic oral tracheal intubation skills: do manipulation skills learned on a simple model transfer into the operating room. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:343–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Figert PL, Park AE, Witzke DB, Schwartz RW. Transfer of training in acquiring laparoscopic skills. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;193(5):533–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Norman G, Eva K, Brooks L, Hamstra S. Expertise in medicine and surgery. In: Ericsson KA, Charness N, Feltovich PJ, Hoffman RR, editors. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bond WF, Deitrick LM, Eberhardt M, Barr GC, Kane BG, Worrilow CC, Arnold DC, Croskerry P. Cognitive versus technical debriefing after simulation training. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13(3):276–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Adams S, Pandey V, Darzi A. A human factors analysis of technical and team skills among surgical trainees during procedural simulations in a simulated operating theatre. Ann Surg. 2005;242(5):631–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. http://www.msr.org.il/R_D/Debriefing_Techniques/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush Medical College, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 1063, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA

    Aaron G. Rosenberg

Authors
  1. Aaron G. Rosenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron G. Rosenberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopedic Service Line, Northwell Health , New York, New York, USA

    Giles R. Scuderi

  2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rutgers-Robert Wood JohnsonMedicalSchool Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA

    Alfred J. Tria

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Rosenberg, A.G. (2016). What Is Minimally Invasive Surgery and How Do You Learn It?. In: Scuderi, G., Tria, A. (eds) Minimally Invasive Surgery in Orthopedics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34109-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34109-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-34107-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-34109-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation