Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Minimally Invasive Achilles Tendon Repair

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Minimally Invasive Surgery in Orthopedics

  • 147 Accesses

Abstract

There is currently no consensus regarding the optimal management for acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Nonoperative treatments present comparable results to operative treatments with fewer wound-healing problems but eventually slower return to previous activities and a higher rerupture rate if no accelerated and functional rehabilitation is performed. Regarding surgical treatment, good clinical results have been shown with open suturing techniques, but they also have been associated with superficial and deep wound complications, driving enthusiasm to minimally invasive surgical procedures. These latter techniques have been developed to improve recovery and final function and cosmetic appearance and reduce postoperative soft tissue complications observed with open repairs. Some mini-open techniques like the Achillon® or Pars® techniques open the Achilles rupture site evacuating the hematoma and losing its theoretical healing potential. An intrinsic sural nerve damage risk is present given their percutaneous nature. Besides, they use specific and expensive instruments being some of them single use only.

The authors’ preferred minimally invasive technique is the Dresden procedure. This procedure is performed through a small, longitudinal paramedian incision proximal-medial to the tendon rupture site, using a specific surgical interval between the superficial fascia and the paratenon. This interval is used as a working space to perform the tenorrhaphy using inexpensive and easily available instrumentation. The paratenon is preserved, the local hematoma is untouched, and the sural nerve is avoided given its passage above the fascia. This technique is reproducible, easy to teach, and inexpensive, reduces wound-healing complications in comparison to open techniques, avoids sural nerve damage, and shows good functional long-term results. Complications such as reruptures and infection are comparable to other mini-open techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gulati V, Jaggard M, Al-Nammari S, Uzoigwe C, Gulati P, Ismail N, Gibbons C, Gupte C. Management of Achilles tendon injury: a current concepts systematic review. World J Orthop. 2015;6(4):380–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Heckman D, Gluck G, Parekh S. Tendon disorders of the foot and ankle, part 2. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:1223–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Maffulli N, Longo U, Oliva F, Ronga M, Denaro V. Minimally invasive surgery of the Achilles tendon. Orthop Clin N Am. 2009;40:491–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Olsson N, Nilsson-Helander K, Karlsson J, Eriksson BI, Thomee R, Faxen E, Silbernagel KG. Major functional deficits persist 2 years after acute Achilles tendon rupture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19:1385–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Soroceanu A, Sidhwa F, Aarabi S, Kaufman A, Glazebrook M. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. A meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:2136–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Young S, Patel A, Zhu M, Van Dijck S, McNair P, Bevan W, Tomlinson M. Weight-bearing in the nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. A randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:1073–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Davies M, Solan M. Minimal incision techniques for acute Achilles repair. Foot Ankle Clin N Am. 2009;14:685–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Khan RJ, Fick D, Brammar TJ, Crawford J, Parker MJ. Interventions for treating acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;3, CD003674.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kotnis R, David S, Handley R, Willett K, Ostlere S. Dynamic ultrasound as a selection tool for reducing Achilles tendon reruptures. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(9):1395–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Olsson N, Silbernagel KG, Eriksson BI, Sansone M, Brorsson A, Nilsson-Helander K, Karlsson J. Stable surgical repair with accelerated rehabilitation versus nonsurgical treatment for acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a randomized controlled study. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(12):2867–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Metz R, Verleisdonk EJ, van der Heijden GJ, Clevers GJ, Hammacher ER, Verhofstad MH, van der Werken C. Acute Achilles tendon rupture: minimally invasive surgery versus nonoperative treatment with immediate full weight bearing – a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(9):1688–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cukelj F, Bandalovic A, Knezevic J, Pavic A, Pivalica B, Bakota B. Treatment of ruptured Achilles tendon: operative or non-operative procedure? Injury Int J Care Injured. 2015;46S:S137–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Clanton T, Haytmanek T, Williams B, Civitarese D, Turnbull T, Massey M, Wijdicks C, LaPrade R. A biomechanical comparison of an open repair and 3 minimally invasive percutaneous Achilles tendon repair techniques during a simulated, progressive rehabilitation protocol. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(8):1957–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hsu A, Jones C, Cohen B, Davis W, Ellington K, Anderson R. Clinical outcomes and complications of percutaneous Achilles repair system versus open technique for acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(11):1279–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Amlang M, Christiani P, Heinz P, et al. The percutaneous suture of the Achilles tendon with the Dresden instrument. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2006;18(4):287–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Keller A, Ortiz C, Wagner E, Wagner P, Mococain P. Mini-open tenorrhaphy of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Medium-term follow-up of 100 cases. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(3):731–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ortiz C, Wagner E, Mocoçain P, Labarca G, Keller A, Del Buono A, Maffulli A. Biomechanical comparison of four methods of repair of the Achilles tendon. A laboratory study with bovine tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94-B:663–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ma GW, Griffith TG. Percutaneous repair of acute closed ruptured Achilles tendon: a new technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977;128:247–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cretnik A, Kosanovic M, Smrkolj V. Percutaneous versus open repair of the ruptured Achilles tendon: a comparative study. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(9):1369–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Aktas S, Kocaoglu B. Open versus minimal invasive repair with Achillon device. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(5):391–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Orr JD, McCriskin B, Dutton JR. Achillon mini-open Achilles tendon repair: early outcomes and return to duty results in U.S. military service members. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2013;22(1):23–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chan AP, Chan YY, Fong DT, Wong PY, Lam HY, Lo CK, Yung PS, Fung KY, Chan KM. Clinical and biomechanical outcome of minimal invasive and open repair of the Achilles tendon. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2011;3(1):32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Amlang MH, Christiani P, Heinz P, Zwipp H. Die perkutane Achillessehnennaht mit dem Dresdner Instrument. Unfallchirurg. 2005;108:529–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Movin T, Ryberg A, McBride DJ, Maffulli N. Acute rupture of the Achilles tendon. Foot Ankle Clin. 2005;10(2):331–56. Review.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Foot and ankle surgeon, Orthopaedic Surgery department, Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Universidad del Desarrollo, Vitacura 5951, Santiago, Chile

    Emilio Wagner, Pablo Wagner, Andres Keller, Diego Zanolli & Cristian Ortiz

Authors
  1. Emilio Wagner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pablo Wagner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andres Keller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Diego Zanolli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Cristian Ortiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emilio Wagner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Insall Scott Kelly Institute, New York, New York, USA

    Giles R. Scuderi

  2. Orthopaedic Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA

    Alfred J. Tria

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Wagner, E., Wagner, P., Keller, A., Zanolli, D., Ortiz, C. (2016). Minimally Invasive Achilles Tendon Repair. In: Scuderi, G., Tria, A. (eds) Minimally Invasive Surgery in Orthopedics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15206-6_99-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15206-6_99-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15206-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation