Abstract
“Animal rights” is principally a modern, western consideration. As a Kantian concept, it assumes that general principles (rights) should be granted to animals in order to define the relationship between humans and animals. The arguments of Tom Regan and Gary Francione are based on a radical (abolitionist) approach to animal rights, but their scope is limited to the most intelligent animals (vertebrates and mammals). The Universal Declaration of Animal Rights adopted a broader approach, including all animal groups with their specific features in a biologically balanced context. A number of questions are still unanswered; the position for a gradualist view of animals and animal rights, and therefore the connection between human rights and animal rights. The Great Ape Project advocates that apes be granted certain rights traditionally reserved for humans, thus focusing attention on the need for a gradualist approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Bovet, D., & Chapouthier, G. (2013). Scientific identification and definition of degrees of sensitivity in the animal world. In T. Auffret Van Der Kemp & M. Lachance (Eds.), Animal suffering: From science to law (pp. 13–23). Toronto: Carswell.
Chapouthier, G., & Nouet, J. C. (Eds.). (1998). The universal declaration of animal rights, comments and intentions. Paris: Publisher Ligue Francaise des Droits de l’Animal.
Francione, G. (1995). Animals, property and the law. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Neumann, J. M. (2012). The universal declaration of animal rights or the creation of a new equilibrium between species. Animal Law, 19(1), 91–109.
Regan, T. (1983). The case for animal rights. California: University of California Press. further editions 1985, 2004.
Singer, P. (2003). Animal liberation at 30. The New York Review, 15, 23–26.
Singer, P., & Cavalieri, P. (Eds.). (1993). The great ape project: Equality beyond humanity. London: Fourth Estate publishing.
Further Reading
Auffret Van Der Kemp, T., & Lachance, M. (Eds.). (2013). Animal suffering: From science to law. Toronto: Carswell.
Linzey, A. (Ed.). (2013). The global guide to animal protection. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
Singer, P. (1975). Animal liberation: A new ethics for our treatment of animals. New York: Review/Random House. Further editions 1976, 1977, 1983, 2009.
Acknowledgments
The author wishes to thank Dr. Jean-Yves Goffi for his advice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Chapouthier, G. (2014). Animal Rights. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_22-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_22-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities