Abstract
Self-seeding is an active filtering method for Free-Electron Lasers (FELs) enabling the production of nearly Fourier-limited pulses in the X-ray frequency range where external seeding is not available. Schematically, it is composed of three parts: a Self-Amplified Spontaneous Emission (SASE) FEL working in the linear regime, a monochromator, and an FEL amplifier. Active filtering is achieved by letting the FEL pulse produced in the SASE FEL through the monochromator, while the electron beam is sent through a bypass, and its microbunching is destroyed due to dispersion. The filtered SASE pulse, serving as a seed, is recombined with the electron beam at the entrance of the FEL amplifier part. It is then amplified up to saturation and possibly beyond via post-saturation tapering. This allows for the production of high-brightness, nearly single-mode FEL pulses. The technique has been or will be implemented in a number of X-ray FEL (XFEL) facilities under operation or in the construction phase. In this chapter, we review the principle of self-seeding, its practical realizations, and related techniques.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In contrast to the delay issue, for an energy spread of order Δγ∕γ ∼ 0.01 % and wavelengths in the order of 0.1 nm, the electron beam microbunching is washed out already for an R56 in the order of a few microns.
- 2.
Above 12 keV, the efficiency of self-seeding tends to decrease due to a combination of different reasons linked to the Bragg angle, the width of the reflection, and the gain length.
- 3.
It is indeed this narrow collimation that allows to assume that all frequency components of the incident field impinge at the same constant angle.
- 4.
For high-repetition rates, heat-loading studies will also be needed in the case of grating monochromators in the soft X-ray spectral range.
- 5.
For high-repetition rate applications, at the European XFEL, it was actually decided to install two-chicane HXRSS setups.
- 6.
Other gas choices are possible. For example, in (Geloni et al. 2011d), also neon was considered for photon energies between 45 eV and 49 eV and argon for a photon energy of 28.5 eV.
- 7.
- 8.
Such smaller separation may be useful at VUV facilities, in order to seed at multiple photon wavelengths with separation of a fraction of eV, similarly to what has been proposed in Geloni et al. (2011c).
References
W. Ackermann et al., Nat. Photonics 1, 336–342 (2007)
M. Altarelli et al. (eds.), XFEL, The European X-ray free-electron laser. Technical design report, DESY 2006-097 (2006). Fulltext available at http://arxiv.org/
J. Amann et al., Nat. Photonics 6, 693 (2012)
A. Bohm, Quantum Mechanics (Springer, New York, 1979)
R. Bonifacio, C. Pellegrini, L. Narducci, Opt. Commun. 50, 373 (1984)
M. Cornacchia et al., J. Synchrotron Radiat. 11, 227 (2004)
F. Curbis et al., Simulation studies for an X-ray FEL based on an extension of the MAX IV linac, in Proceedings of the 2013 FEL Conference, New York, WEPSO07 (2013)
F.-J. Decker et al., Improving and maintaining FEL beam stability of the LCLS, in Proceedings of the 2014 IPAC Conference, Dresden, THPRO035 (2014)
W. Decking and V. Blank., Design and construction of hard X-ray self-seeding setups for the European XFEL (XFELSEED), coordinated Russian-German project in the framework of the ‘Ioffe-Röntgen’ cooperation (2014)
Y. Ding, Z. Huang, R. Ruth, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 13, 060703 (2010)
Y. Ding et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 254802 (2012)
P. Emma et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 074801-1 (2004a)
P. Emma, M. Borland, Z. Huang, Femtosecond and Subfemtosecond X-ray pulses from a self-amplified spontaneous-emission-based free-electron laser, in Proceedings of the 2004 FEL Conference, Trieste, TUBIS01 (2004b)
P. Emma et al., Nat. Photonics 4, 641 (2010)
C. Emma et al., Phys. Rev. ST AB 17, 110701 (2014)
U. Fano, Phys. Rev. 124, 6 (1961)
U. Fano, A.R.P. Rau, Atomic Collisions and Spectra (Academic, Orlando, 1986)
W. Fawley et al., NIM A 483, 537 (2002)
W.M. Fawley et al., Toward TW-level LCLS radiation pulses, in Proceedings of the FEL 2011 Conference, Shanghai, TUOA4 (2011)
J. Feldhaus et al., Opt. Commun. 140, 341 (1997)
Y. Feng, J. Hastings, P. Heimann, M. Rowen, J. Krzywinski, J. Wu, X-ray optics for soft X-ray self-seeding the LCLS-II, in Proceedings of the 2010 FEL Conference, Malmo, TUBP10 (2010)
Y. Feng et al., System design for self-seeding the LCLS at soft X-ray energies, in Proceedings of the 2012 FEL Conference, Nara, TUOBI01 (2012)
G. Geloni, V. Kocharyan, E. Saldin, Ultrafast X-ray pulse measurement method, DESY 10-008 (2008). Fulltext available at http://arxiv.org/
G. Geloni, V. Kocharyan, E. Saldin, Scheme for generation of fully coherent, TW power level hard x-ray pulses from baseline undulators at the European XFEL, DESY 10-108 (2010a). Fulltext available at http://arxiv.org/
G. Geloni, V. Kocharyan, E. Saldin, Scheme for generation of highly monochromatic X-rays from a baseline XFEL undulator, DESY 10-033 (2010b). Fulltext available at http://arxiv.org/
G. Geloni, V. Kocharyan, E. Saldin, Cost-effective way to enhance the capabilities of the LCLS baseline, DESY 10-133 (2010c). Fulltext available at http://arxiv.org/
G. Geloni, V. Kocharyan, E. Saldin, Scheme for femtosecond-resolution pump-probe experiments at XFELs with two-color ten GW-level X-ray pulses, DESY-10-004 (2010d). Fulltext available at http://arxiv.org/
G. Geloni, V. Kocharyan, E. Saldin, Self-seeded operation of the LCLS hard X-ray FEL in the long-bunch mode, DESY 10-239 (2010e). Fulltext available at http://arxiv.org/
G. Geloni, V. Kocharyan, E. Saldin, J. Modern Opt. 58, 1391 (2011a)
G. Geloni, V. Kocharyan, E. Saldin, Production of transform-limited X-ray pulses through self-seeding at the European X-ray FEL, DESY 11-165 (2011b). Fulltext available at http://arxiv.org/
G. Geloni, V. Kocharyan, E. Saldin, Opt. Commun. 284, 3348 (2011c)
G. Geloni, V. Kocharyan, E. Saldin, Self-seeding scheme with gas monochromator for narrow-bandwidth soft X-ray FELs, DESY 11-049 (2011d). Fulltext available at http://arxiv.org/
G. Geloni, V. Kocharyan, E. Saldin, Gas-filled cell as a narrow bandwidth bandpass filter in the VUV wavelength range, DESY 11-055 (2011d). Fulltext available at http://arxiv.org/
G. Geloni et al., Wake monochromator in asymmetric and symmetric Bragg and Laue geometry for self-seeding the European XFEL, DESY 13-013 (2013). Fulltext available at http://arxiv.org/
O. Grimm, K. Klose, S. Schreiber, Double-pulse generation with the FLASH injector laser for pump-probe experiments, in Proceedings of EPAC 2006 Conference, Edinburgh, THPCH150 (2006)
T. Hara et al., Nat. Commun. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3919
J. Harries et al., J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 46, 164021 (2013)
T. Inagaki et al., Hard X-ray self-seeding setup and results at SACLA, in Proceedings of the 2014 FEL Conference, Basel, TUC01 (2014)
T. Ishikawa et al., Nat. Photonics 6, 540 (2012)
Y. Jiao et al., Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 15, 050704 (2012)
H.-S. Kang, Current status of PAL-XFEL project, in Proceedings of the 2014 FEL Conference, Basel, WEODB103 (2014)
I.S. Ko, J.-H. Han, Current status of PAL-XFEL, in Proceedings of the 27th Linear Accelerator Conference, Geneva, MOIOB04 (2014)
A. Kondratenko, E. Saldin, Part. Accel. 10, 207 (1980)
H.A. Kramers, La diffusion de la lumière par les atomes, in Atti del Congresso Internazionale dei Fisici, 2, 545 (1927)
N.M. Kroll, P. Morton, M.N. Rosenbluth, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-17, 1436 (1981)
R. de L. Kronig, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 12, 547–557 (1926)
A. Lin, J.M. Dawson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 2172 (1986)
R.R. Lindberg, Y.V. Shvydko, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 15, 050706 (2012)
V. Lucarini et al., Kramers-Kronig Relations in Optical Materials Research, (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg 2004)
A. Lutman et al., J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42, 045202 (2009)
A.A. Lutman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 134801 (2013)
A. Lutman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 254801 (2014)
A. Marinelli et al., Nat. Commun. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7369
H. Morgan, D. Hederer, Phys. Rev. A 29, 4 (1984)
T.J. Orzechovski et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2172 (1986)
E. Prat, S. Reiche, Self-seeding design for SwissFEL, in Proceedings of the 2013 FEL Conference, New York, WEPSO5 (2013)
D. Ratner et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 054801 (2015)
T. Raubenheimer, The LCLS-II, a new FEL facility at SLAC, in Proceedings of the 2014 FEL Conference, Basel, WEB001 (2014)
E. Saldin, E. Schneidmiller, M. Yurkov, The Physics of Free-Electron Lasers (Springer, Berlin, 1999)
E. Saldin, E. Schneidmiller, Yu. Shvyd’ko, M. Yurkov, NIM A 475, 357 (2001)
S. Serkez et al., Phys. Rev. ST AB 18, 030708 (2015)
D. Shu et al., J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 425, 052004 (2013)
Y. Shvydko, R. Lindberg, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 15, 100702 (2012)
P. Sprangle, C.M. Tang, W.M. Manheimer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 1932 (1979)
R. Ganter et al. (eds.), SwissFEL conceptual design report, PSI Bericht Nr. 10-04 (2012)
J. Toll, Phys. Rev. 104, 6 (1956)
R. Treusch, W. Brefeld, J. Feldhaus, U. Hahn, The seeding project for the FEL in TTF phase II. Annual report (2001)
X. Wang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 154801 (2009)
J. Welch, Seeding at LCLS FEL, Joint DESY and University of Hamburg Accelerator Physics Seminar, 5 Feb 2013, DESY Hamburg (2013), http://www-mpy.desy.de/AccPhySemDESY/y2013/JWelch_SeedingAtLCLS.pdf
J. Wu, Recent experimental and theoretical results on tapering for high intensity extraction, in Workshop on Advanced X-Ray FEL Development, Hamburg (2014), http://www.xfel.eu/events/workshops/2014/workshop_on_advanced_x_ray_fel_development/
J. Wu et al., Staged self-seeding scheme for narrow bandwidth, ultra-short X-ray harmonic generation free electron laser at LCLS, in Proceedings of the 2010 FEL Conference, Malmo, TUPB08 (2010)
J. Wu et al., Simulation of the hard X-ray self-seeding FEL at LCLS, in Proceedings of the 2011 FEL Conference, Shanghai, MOPB09 (2011)
I. Zagorodnov, Beam dynamics simulations for XFEL (2011), http://www.desy.de/fel-beam/s2e/
D. Zhu et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 034103 (2012)
Acknowledgments
I am grateful to Evgeni Saldin (DESY) for the careful reading of the manuscript and his continuous advice. I thank Serguei Molodtsov (European XFEL) for his interest in this work and his support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Theory of Soft X-Ray Self-Seeding (SXRSS) with Gas Monochromator
Appendix: Theory of Soft X-Ray Self-Seeding (SXRSS) with Gas Monochromator
The self-seeding technique was originally devised for the soft X-ray range. Even before the successful demonstration of the HXRSS setup at the LCLS (Amann et al. 2012) and at SACLA (Inagaki et al. 2014), the community recognized the need for an extension of the method to the soft X-ray range. In fact, the use of diamond crystals to implement wake monochromators is unfortunately limited by the distance between atomic layers to X-ray energies above 3 keV. However, as discussed in section “Principles of Operation and Design”, the general principle of operation of a wake monochromator does not include exclusively the use of crystals. In fact, the overall technique, albeit difficult to implement without crystals, is only based on the possibility of obtaining narrow bandwidth “holes” in the SASE FEL spectrum. In (Geloni et al. 2011d), a possible extension of the wake monochromator method to the soft X-ray range was presented, based on a gas cell filled with resonantly absorbing gas. If the transmittance spectrum in the gas exhibits an absorbing resonance with a bandwidth narrow enough for seeding then, similarly to the hard X-ray case, the temporal waveform of the transmitted radiation pulse is characterized by a long monochromatic wake. In other words, the FEL pulse forces the gas atoms to oscillate in a way consistent with a forward-propagating, monochromatic radiation beam.
In Geloni et al. (2011d), it was proposed to take advantage of autoionizing resonances in rare gases to seed in the XUV/soft X-ray range. The phenomenon of autoionization is well known in literature (see, for instance, textbooks like Bohm (1979), Fano and Rau (1986), and references therein). Here we consider helium atomic gas as an example.Footnote 6 Autoionizing resonances result from the decay of doubly excited Rydberg states He∗ into the continuum, i.e., He∗→ He+ + e−. Since the continuum can also be reached by direct photoionization, both paths add coherently, giving rise to interference. This interference is related to the typical Fano line shape for the cross section as a function of energy Fano (1961). Here we only report the cross section for these series, which can be modeled by the expression Morgan and Hederer (1984):
where the energy-dependent background cross section expressed in Megabarn (1 Mb = 10−18 cm2) is given by σb(λ) = −0.05504 − 1.3624 ⋅ 10−4λ + 3.3822 ⋅ 10−5λ2, with λ the radiation wavelength in Angstrom units, while the reduced energy \(\mathscr {E}_n\) is defined as \(\mathscr {E}_n = {2(E_{R_n}-hc/\lambda )}/{\varGamma _n}\). The asymmetry index qn, the energy of the nth resonance \(E_{R_n}\), and the resonance width Γn can be found, for example, in (Morgan and Hederer 1984). Using these parameters, the cross sections for the series (sp, 2n+) can be calculated from Eq. (8) and are shown in Fig. 15 as a function of the energy. The photoabsorption cross-section σ is linked to the light attenuation through a gas medium of column density n0l, where l is the length of the cell and n0 the gas density.
If a monochromatic electromagnetic pulse of intensity I0 and frequency ω impinges on a cell of length l, filled with a gas with density n0, the transmitted intensity obeys the Beer-Lambert law
As a result, by comparison with Eq. (9), the modulus of the transmissivity can be defined as \(|T| = \exp [-n_0 l \sigma (\omega )/2]\). We may then write
In the following, we will choose a column density equal to n0l = 1018 cm−2, and we will restrict ourselves to the third (n = 4) resonant line of the (sp, 2n+)1P0 Rydberg series for helium. The cross sections can be calculated with the help of Eq. (8). This fixes |T| as a function of frequency. Then, following the general treatment in section “Self-Seeding XFELs with a Wake Monochromator”, one can use Kramers-Kronig relation to recover the phase according to Eq. (2). The final result in terms of modulus and phase of the transmissivity T is shown in Fig. 16.
The filter described hereFootnote 7 can substitute the single crystal considered in the previous section for HXRSS. Therefore, the self-seeding setup just consists of the gas cell, to be filled with noble gas, and a short magnetic chicane. Figure 17 shows an example of an FEL pulse filtered with the help of the gas monochromator. It refers to a case study described in detail in Geloni et al. (2011d). Note that the shape of the wake is now completely different compared to the case of a diamond wake monochromator, but this is not important. In fact, therefore the radiation power within the wake is much larger than the equivalent shot-noise power in the electron bunch and can be used as seed pulse.
The scheme discussed here, while remaining of theoretical interest, has several practical limitations. In fact, although the availability of a series of resonances and of different gases allows for seeding at different frequencies, the scheme lacks continuous tunability. Moreover, not all resonances can be used. In fact, they should be located further away from each other than the FEL bandwidth and be narrow enough to guarantee the applicability of the temporal windowing process. In the case in Fig. 17, a rule of thumb requires a width narrower than 10 meV. In this case, for example, only the second and the third helium lines studied here are suitable, as the first one is too wide, and starting from the fourth, there is not enough separation.Footnote 8
Finally, it should be stressed that the autoionizing resonance that we considered here as an example is in the 20-nm range, which is outside the region of interest of the self-seeding technique. A possible way to generate shorter wavelengths, down to the few-nanometer range, is to use a two-stage output undulator, with the second stage resonant to one of the harmonics of the first one (Geloni et al. 2011d). In this way, the second part of the output undulator acts effectively as a radiator, where one exploits the nonlinear bunching present in the electron beam.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Geloni, G. (2020). Self-Seeded Free-Electron Lasers. In: Jaeschke, E., Khan, S., Schneider, J., Hastings, J. (eds) Synchrotron Light Sources and Free-Electron Lasers. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23201-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23201-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23200-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23201-6
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Chemistry, Materials and Physics