Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Informed Consent and Ethical Research

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity

Abstract

Although today valid informed consent is considered key to ethical research, there is no agreement on what constitutes adequate informed consent. Problems ensue firstly from the circumstance that a principle adopted in one area of inquiry (biomedicine) cannot be extended literally to other areas of science. In addition, new areas of scholarly inquiry and changing research contexts contribute to the emergence of new forms of consent (open, broad, dynamic, meta-consent). A second difficulty derives from an overly narrow understanding of the concept of autonomy, resulting in an absolutizing of individual freedom and choices and relegating more collective values such as reciprocity, responsibility, and solidarity to the background.

In this chapter, we explain the origin of the concept of informed consent, what it consists of, and what forms it can take. We will then analyze what has caused shifts in the understanding of the informed consent principle: how much is due to advancements in science and technology and how much to changing ethical frameworks. Finally, we will show why it is important to develop a contextual approach by taking into account differences in research fields as well as types of research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Academy of Medical Sciences (2006) Personal data for public good: using health information in medical research. A report from the Academy of Medical Sciences. Academy of Medical Sciences, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Agre P, Rapkin B (2003) Improving informed consent: a comparison of four consent tools. IRB Eth Hum Res 25(6):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp TL (2011) Informed consent: its history, meaning, and present challenges. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 20(4):515–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (1979/2009) Principles of biomedical ethics, 6th ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp TL, Faden RR (1995/2004) Informed consent. In: Post SG (ed) Encyclopedia of bioethics, 3rd edn. Thomson, New York, pp 1271–1277

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp TL, Faden RR et al (1982) Ethical issues in social science research. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedek TG (2014) “Case Neisser”: experimental design, the beginnings of immunology, and informed consent. Perspect Biol Med 57:249–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beskow L, Burke W, Merz J, Barr PA, Terry S, Penchaszadeh VB et al (2001) Informed consent for population-based research involving genetics. JAMA 286(18):2315–2321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bok S (1978) Lying: moral choice in public and private life. Vintage Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Capron AM (1982) Is consent always necessary in social science research? In: Beauchamp TL et al (eds) Ethical issues in social science research. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick R (2011) The communitarian turn: myth or reality? Camb Q Healthc Ethics 20(4):546–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick R, Berg K (2001) Solidarity and equity: new ethical frameworks for genetic databases. Nat Rev Genet 2:318–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dankar FK, Gergely M, Dankar SK (2019) Informed consent in biomedical research. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 17:463–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faden RR, Beauchamp TL, King NMP (1986) A history and theory of informed consent. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Flory J et al (2007) Informed consent for research. In: Aschroft RE et al (eds) Principles of health care ethics, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester, pp 703–710

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelinas L, Wertheimer A, Miller FG (2016) When and why is research without consent permissible? Hast Cent Rep 46(1):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty KD (2004) Ethics creep: governing social science research in the name of ethics. Qual Sociol 27(4):391–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson M (2010) Do we need a wider view of autonomy in epidemiological research? BMJ 340:1172–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helgesson G, Eriksson S (2011) Does informed consent have an expiry date? A critical reappraisal of informed consent as a process. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 20(1):85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iphofen R (2009) Ethical decision making in social research: a practical guide. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel M (2015) Research ethics and integrity for social scientists, 2nd edn. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel M, Hay I (2006) Research ethics for social scientists. SAGE, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaye J (2004) Broad consent – the only option for population genetic databases? In: Árnason G, Nordal S, Árnason V (eds) Blood and data: ethical, legal, and social aspects of human genetic databases. University of Iceland Press, Reykjavik, pp 103–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaye J et al (2015) Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks. Eur J Hum Genet 23(2):141–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoppers BM, Chadwick R (2005) Human genetic research: emerging trends in ethics. Nat Rev Genet 6:75–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristinsson S (2007) Autonomy and informed consent: a mistaken association? Med Health Care Phil 10(3):253–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristinsson S (2009) The Belmont report’s misleading conception of autonomy. AMA J Ethics 11(8):611–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristinsson S, Árnason V (2007) Informed consent and human genetic research. In: Häyry M et al (eds) The ethics and governance of human genetic databases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 199–216

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lunshof JE et al (2008) From genetic privacy to open consent. Nat Rev Genet 9(5):406–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie C et al (2014) Vulnerability. New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Manson NC (2007) Consent and informed consent. In: Aschroft RE et al (eds) Principles of health care ethics, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester, pp 297–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Manson NC (2019) The ethics of biobanking: assessing the right to control problem for broad consent. Bioethics 33(5):540–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manson NC, O’Neill O (2007) Rethinking informed consent in bioethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno JD, Caplan AL et al (1998) Informed consent. In: Chadwick R (ed) Encyclopedia of applied ethics. Academic, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Nõmper A (2005) Open consent – a new form of informed consent for population genetic databases. Tartu University Press, Tartu

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuremberg Code (1947). https://history.nih.gov/research/downloads/nuremberg.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2019

  • O’Neill O (2002) Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ploug T, Holm S (2016) Meta consent – a flexible solution to the problem of secondary use of health data. Bioethics 30(9):721–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ploug T, Holm S (2017) Eliciting meta consent for future secondary research use of health data using a smartphone application – a proof of concept study in the Danish population. BMC Med Ethics 18:51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0209-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ransome P (2013) Ethics & values in social research. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rehbock T (2011) Limits of autonomy in biomedical ethics? Conceptual clarifications. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 20(4):524–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnik D (2018) The ethics of research with human subjects. Protecting people, advancing science, promoting trust. Springer, Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruyter KW (2003) Forskningsetikk: beskyttelse av enkeltpersoner og samfunn. Oslo, Gyldendal akademism

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrag ZM (2010) Ethical imperialism: institutional review boards and the social sciences, 1965–2009. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Research Association (2003) Ethical guidelines. https://sp.mahidol.ac.th/pdf/ref/10_Social%20Research%20Association.pdf. Accessed 24 Sept 2019

  • Steinsbekk KS et al (2013) Broad consent versus dynamic consent in biobank research: is passive participation an ethical problem? Eur J Hum Genet 21(9):897–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutrop M (2011a) Changing ethical frameworks: from individual rights to the common good? Camb Q Healthc Ethics 20(4):533–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutrop M (2011b) How to avoid a dichotomy between autonomy and beneficence: from liberalism to communitarianism and beyond. J Intern Med 269(4):375–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutrop M, Florea C (2010) The guidance note for researchers and evaluators of social sciences and humanities. http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/fp7/89867/social-sciences-humanities_en.pdf. Accessed 24 Sept 2019

  • Sutrop M, Simm K (2011) Guest editorial: a call for contextualized bioethics: health, biomedical research, and security. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 20(4):511–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Belmont Report (1979) Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2019

  • The European Commission (2018) Ethics in social sciences and humanities. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/hi/h2020_ethics-soc-science-humanities_en.pdf. Accessed 24 Sept 2019

  • The European Commission (2019) Guidance note – research on refugees, asylum seekers & migrants. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/hi/guide_research-refugees-migrants_en.pdf. Accessed 24 Sept 2019

  • Tuija Takala (2017) Setting a Dangerous Precedent? Ethical Issues in Human Genetic Database Research. Medical Law International 8 (2):105–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmann J, Winau R (1996) Informed consent in human experimentation before the Nuremberg code. BMJ 313:1445–1447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Medical Association (2013) Declaration of Helsinki – ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. https://wwwwmanet/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/. Accessed 15 Mar 2019

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is based on research undertaken for the research project IUT20-5, funded by the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research and supported by the Centre of Excellence in Estonian Studies (European Union, European Regional Development Fund). We also profited from our research done for the PRO-RES project, funded by the European Commission Horizon 2020 Program. We are grateful to Tiina Kirss for her editing and help with English expression.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia

    Margit Sutrop

  2. Centre for Ethics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia

    Kristi Lõuk

Authors
  1. Margit Sutrop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kristi Lõuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margit Sutrop .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Chatelaillon Plage, France

    Ron Iphofen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Sutrop, M., Lõuk, K. (2020). Informed Consent and Ethical Research. In: Iphofen, R. (eds) Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16759-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation