Skip to main content

Tabula Rasa

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology
  • 676 Accesses

Introduction

The image of the human mind as a tabula rasa (an emptied writing tablet) is widely believed to have originated with Locke in the Essay Concerning Human Understanding and to be a characterization of the mind as formless and without predispositions at birth. Both beliefs are false. On the one hand, the image of the tabula rasa has a long, winding history back to Greek thought. On the other hand, Locke did not use the term “tabula rasa” in the Essay, but rather spoke of the child’s mind as “white paper”; he does not use the image to argue that the child begins formless and pure but that the mind is initially dependent upon experience for its operation. These false but widespread beliefs suggest that the tabula rasa has been used to signify a zero point of utter formlessness, against which discourses on the true nature of the human mind can differentiate their position.

Definition

In his influential Basic Principles of Psychoanalysis, which introduced Freud to American...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agamben, G., ([1993] 1996). Bartleby, or on contingency. In D. Heller-Roazen (Ed.), Potentialities. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. (1955). Becoming: Basic considerations for a psychology of personality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, ([1274] 1990). In P. J. Kreeft (Ed.), A summa of the summa. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartky, S. L. (1995). Agency: What is the problem? In J. K. Gardiner (Ed.), Provoking agents: Theorizing gender and agency. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brill, A. A. (1921). Basic principles of psychoanalysis. New York, NY: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1989). Foucault and the paradox of bodily inscriptions. The Journal of Philosophy, 86(11), 601–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. ([1971] 1998). Nietzsche, history, genealogy. In D. F. James (Ed.), Aesthetics: Essential works (Vol. 2). London, England: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. ([1954] 1970). Crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenrick, D. T., Becker, D. V., Butner, J. E., Norman P. L., & Maner, J. E. (2003). Evolutionary cognitive science. In From mating to mentality. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, V. (1997). Telling flesh: The substance of the corporeal. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Bon, G. ([1899] 1981). The psychology of socialism (B. Miall, Trans.). New York, NY: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G. W. ([1765] 1996). In P. Remnant & J. Bennett (Ed.), New essays on human understanding. Cambridge, UK: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. ([1664] 1997). Essays on the law of nature. In M. Goldie (Ed.), Locke: political writing. Cambridge, UK: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. ([1671] 1990). In P. H. Niddich & G. A. J. Rogers (Ed.), Drafts for the essay concerning human understanding, and other philosophical writings. London, England: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. ([1690] 1979). In P. H. Niddich (Ed.), An essay concerning human understanding, and other philosophical writings. London, England: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marvell, A. ([1951] 1972). Upon Appleton House. In J. Bate (Ed.), Marvell: The complete poems. London, England: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, M. A. (2002). Feminism, Foucault, and embodied subjectivity. New York, NY: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molyneux, W. ([1697] 1981). Réflections de Mr. L–. In E. S. De Beer (Ed.), The correspondence of John Locke: Letters Nos. 21992664. Oxford, UK: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate. London, England: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, D. R., & Kipp, K. (2007). Developmental psychology (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thompson Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift, J. ([1707] 1859). A tritical essay upon the faculties of the mind. In The works of Jonathan Swift (Vol. 5). New York, NY: Derby & Jackson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, T. (1996). Bodies and anti-bodies. In T. J. Csordas (Ed.), Embodiment and experience: The existential ground of culture and self. Cambridge, MA: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahrman, D. (2004). The making of the modern self. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robbie Duschinsky .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Duschinsky, R. (2014). Tabula Rasa. In: Teo, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_515

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_515

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5582-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5583-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics