Introduction
Agency is an explicitly humanistic perspective for understanding ancient people and social reproduction. It emphasizes the reciprocal relationship between people’s conscious and unintended actions and their social, ideological, and material conditions. Agency is an attempt to bridge three long-standing paradigmatic divides: between theories focused on egocentric individuals “in” society, those concerned with the deterministic nature of normative culture, and theories emphasizing the influence of external (material) conditions on both individuals and society.
After more than three decades of experimentation and critical reflection, there is still little consensus across paradigmatic boundaries as to precisely what agency is (Dobres & Robb 2000, for attempts at a comprehensive definition, see Johnson 1989; Bell 1992; Pauketat 2001; Dornan 2002). Nonetheless, as a conceptual framework and an analytic tool, the utility of agency for making sense of the past is undisputed. And...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barrett, J. 2001. Agency: the duality of structure and the problem of the archaeological record, in I. Hodder (ed.) Archaeological theory today: 140-64. Oxford: Polity Press.
Barrett, J. C. 1994. Fragments from antiquity: an archaeology of social life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bell, J. 1992. On capturing agency in theories about prehistory, in J.-C. Gardin & C. Peebles (ed.) Representations in archaeology: 30-55. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dobres, M.-A. 1995. Gender and prehistoric technology: on the social agency of technical strategies. World Archaeology 27: 25-49.
- 2000. Technology and social agency: outlining a practice framework for archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Dobres, M.-A. & J. E. Robb. (ed.) 2000. Agency in archaeology. London: Routledge.
- 2005. “Doing” agency: introductory remarks on methodology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 12(3):159-66.
Dornan, J. L. 2002. Agency and archaeology: past, present and future directions. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 9:303-29.
Englehardt, J. (ed.) 2013. Early writing and agency in archaeology. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.
Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society: outline of a theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gosden, C. 2005. What do objects want? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 12(3):193-211.
Gosden, C. & Y. Marshall. 1999. The cultural biography of objects. World Archaeology 31:169-78.
Johnson, M. 1989. Conceptions of agency in archaeological interpretation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 8:189-211.
Knappett, C. A. & L. Malafouris. (ed.) 2008. Material agency: towards a non-anthropocentric approach. Berlin: Springer.
Marx, K. 1969 [orig. 1869]. The eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York: International Publishers.
Ortner, S. B. 1984. Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History 26:126-66.
Pauketat, T. R. 2001. Practice and history in archaeology: an emerging paradigm. Anthropological Theory 1:73-98.
Robb, J. E. 2007. The early Mediterranean village: agency, material culture and social change in Neolithic Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- 2010. Beyond agency. World Archaeology 42(4):493-520.
Further Reading
Flannery, K. V. 1999. Process and agency in early state formation. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 9:3-21.
Gardner, A. (ed.) 2004. Agency uncovered: archaeological perspectives on social agency, power and being human. London: University College London Press.
Gell, A. 1998. Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hodder, I. 2000. Agency and individuals in long-term processes, in M.-A. Dobres & J. E. Robb (ed.) Agency in Archaeology: 21-33. London: Routledge.
Hoskins, J. 2006. Agency, biography and objects, in C. Tilley, W. Keane, S. Küchler & M. Rowlands (ed.) Handbook of material culture: 74-84. London: Sage.
Robb, J. E. 2005. Agency, in C. Renfrew & P. Bahn (ed.) Archaeology: the key concepts: 3-7. London: Routledge.
Silliman, S. 2001. Agency, practical politics and the archaeology of culture contact. Journal of Social Archaeology 1(2):190-209.
Smith, A. T. 2001. The limitations of doxa: agency and subjectivity from an archaeological point of view. Journal of Social Archaeology 1:155-71.
Varien, M. D. & J. M. Potter. (ed.) 2008. The social construction of communities: agency, structure, and identity in the prehispanic southwest. Lanham (MD): AltaMira.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this entry
Cite this entry
Dobres, MA. (2014). Agency in Archaeological Theory. In: Smith, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_252
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_252
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0426-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0465-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law