Skip to main content

Traumatic Brain Injury and the Use of Documentary Narrative Media to Redress Social Stigma

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Neuroethics

Abstract

This chapter takes as its focus the topic of traumatic brain injury (TBI) from the perspective of “Public and Cultural Neuroethics,” showing that there are deeply entrenched social and cultural barriers implicated in the trauma and injury commonly experienced by TBI survivors. The first section (“Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and the Situational Context for Survivors”) details some basic facts about TBI and the situational context for this patient population. The second section (“Mistaken or Misattributed Beliefs About TBI”) explains some of the prevalent societal misperceptions of persons living with TBIs, especially those linked to living with hidden disabilities as “the walking wounded.” The third section (“Problems of Social Stigma”) explains the problems of social stigma and what can be learned from on point mental illness research for making sense of societal challenges facing TBI survivors. The final section (“Educational Strategies and Using Narrative Media for Combating Stigma”) concludes the chapter by examining educational strategies and the use of documentary narrative media for combating and redressing stigmas against this population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 999.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this regard, Racine’s work in neuroethics might be read as cutting off the path that slips into looking for answers to mental health in “neuroscience fiction” when relevant progress would seem more likely for the near future by paying greater attention to some of the methods, tools, and resources made available through the social sciences.

  2. 2.

    With the term “societal impediments” I would like to make room for understanding the barriers imposed by societies on TBI survivors as including more than just social factors. What is more, the disabling societal factors discussed in this chapter not only have a negative effect on the functioning of TBI survivors but also erect barriers against the possibility for “societies-in-general” from accessing the rich experiences and resources of this unnecessarily alienated population (cf. Scully 2008). Admittedly, this chapter focuses, in the main, on the losses experienced by TBI survivors, though more should be said on the relevant lost benefits to their respective societies (Sherry et al. 2010; cf. Swain and French 2000; The Disability Pride and Awareness Committee 2013).

  3. 3.

    Cf. Gouvier et al. (1988) and Springer et al. (1997) for discussions of misperceptions of TBI survivors by their family members.

  4. 4.

    See McClure et al. (2011) and Stone and Colella (1996) for a discussion of how people’s expectations affect outcomes for persons with invisible disabilities.

  5. 5.

    McLellan and colleagues’ study also showed that test subjects unfamiliar with TBI and its effects had unconscious negative attitudes towards patients with TBI (McLellan et al. 2010; referenced by Phelan et al. 2011, p. 178). Burris has noted that diseased-based stigma may operate, in the main, through automatic emotional reactions and that familiarity may serve to reduce these reactions like the process of desensitization through exposure can reduce evolutionary-based phobias (Burris 2008, p. 475).

  6. 6.

    See Allport (1954), Pettigrew (1998), Pettigrew and Tropp (2000), and Couture and Penn (2003) for explanations of the intergroup contact theory hypothesis according to which direct interaction between members of the “in-group” with the “out-group” is thought to improve prejudicial attitudes (Walker and Scior 2013, p. 2201). See also Dovidio et al. (2003) and Pettigrew and Tropp (2008).

  7. 7.

    The website features a DVD transcript (in English), a Spanish translation of the transcript, special interview footage with TBI self-advocate and disabilities scholar Mark Sherry, TBI “Links of Note” (tab), reviews of the film, a link to the Brain Injury Dialogues Facebook page, and posted comments. See http://www.braininjurydialogues.org/.

References

  • Ahern, M. K. (2011). Self-reflexivity in the formulation of autonomy: An appeal from feminist cultural studies. American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience, 2(3), 52–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, G. L., Walker, V. G., & Levy, J. A. (1982). Social distance from the stigmatized. A test of two theories. Social Science & Medicine, 16(14), 1319–1327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angermeyer, M. C., Matschinger, H., & Corrigan, P. W. (2004). Familiarity with mental illness and social distance from people with schizophrenia and major depression: Testing a model using data from a representative population survey. Schizophrenia Research, 69(2–3), 175–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arciniegas, D. B., & McAllister, T. W. (2008). Neurobehavioral management of traumatic brain injury in the critical care setting. Critical Care Clinics, 24(4), 737–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arciniegas, D. B., Topkoff, J., & Silver, J. M. (2000). Neuropsychiatric aspects of traumatic brain injury. Current Treatment Options in Neurology, 2(2), 169–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubrey, J. B., Dobbs, A. R., & Rule, B. G. (1989). Laypersons’ knowledge about the sequelae of minor head injury and whiplash. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 52(7), 842–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baun, K. (2009). The role of the media in forming attitudes towards mental illness. Moods Magazine (www.moodsmag.com), Winter (2009), pp. 27–29.

  • Bérubé, J. E. (1998). Brain injury advocacy. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 13(5), 99–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bérubé, J. E. (2002). Funding brain injury programs: The federal appropriations process. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 17(1), 62–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bérubé, J. E. (2003). A campaign for a “cure”. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 18(2), 204–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIAC (2013). What is brain injury? Brain Injury Association of Canada. Retrieved 26 July 2011, from: http://biac-aclc.ca/en/

  • Brosnan, C. (2011). The sociology of neuroethics: Expectational discourses and the rise of a new discipline. Sociology Compass, 5(4), 287–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, J., & Hauser, W. A. (2003). The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury: A review. Epilepsia, 44, 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brzuzy, S., & Speziale, B. A. (1997). Persons with traumatic brain injuries and their families: Living arrangements and well-being post injury. Social Work in Health Care, 26(1), 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burris, S. (2008). Stigma, ethics and policy: A commentary on Bayer’s “stigma and the ethics of public health: Not can we but should we?”. Social Science & Medicine, 67(3), 473–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, P. (2000). Stigma of mental illness and ways of diminishing it. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 6(1), 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carsrud, A. L., Ahlgren, R. D., & Dood, B. G. (1986). Evaluating the effects of a community awareness programme on attitudes towards sheltered work and living projects. British Journal of Mental Subnormality, 32(62, Pt.1), 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • CDC (2013). Injury prevention & control: Traumatic brain injury. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. from: http://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/statistics.html

  • CDC Foundation TBI (2013). Heads up TBI film festival. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved 25 Jan 2013, from: http://www.youtube.com/user/CDCFoundationTBI/videos?view=0

  • Chapman, R. C. G., & Hudson, J. M. (2010). Beliefs about brain injury in Britain. Brain Injury, 24(6), 797–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesnutt, R. M., Carney, N. A., Oregon Health Sciences University, United States, & Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, (1999). Rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. (no. 99-E 006 ed.) Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, S., van Nieuwenhuizen, A., Kassam, A., Flach, C., Lazarus, A., de Castro, M., et al. (2012). Filmed v. Live social contact interventions to reduce stigma: Randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 201(1), 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, J. D. (2006). Consequences of traumatic brain injury for functioning in the community. NIH [National Institutes of Health] Consensus Development Conference on Rehabilitation of Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury (October 26–28, 1998, Bethesda, MD). Retrieved 28 July 2013, from: https://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/TBI_1999/Pages/Abstracts.aspx#ConsequencesFunctioning

  • Corrigan, P. W. (1998). The impact of stigma on severe mental illness. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 5(2), 201–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, P. W. (2011). Best practices: Strategic stigma change (SSC): Five principles for social marketing campaigns to reduce stigma. Psychiatric Services, 62(8), 824–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, P. W., & Penn, D. L. (1999). Lessons from social psychology on discrediting psychiatric stigma. American Psychologist, 54(9), 765–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, P. W., & Watson, A. C. (2002a). Understanding the impact of stigma on people with mental illness. World Psychiatry, 1(1), 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, P. W., & Watson, A. C. (2002b). The paradox of self-stigma and mental illness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9(1), 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, P. W., River, L. P., Lundin, R. K., Wasowski, K. U., Campion, J., Mathisen, J., et al. (2000). Stigmatizing attributions about mental illness. Journal of Community Psychology, 28(1), 91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, P. W., Edwards, A. B., Green, A., Diwan, S. L., & Penn, D. L. (2001a). Prejudice, social distance, and familiarity with mental illness. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 27(2), 219–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, P. W., Green, A., Lundin, R., Kubiak, M. A., & Penn, D. L. (2001b). Familiarity with and social distance from people who have serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 52(7), 953–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, P. W., River, L. P., Lundin, R. K., Penn, D. L., Uphoff-Wasowski, K., Campion, J., et al. (2001c). Three strategies for changing attributions about severe mental illness. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 27(2), 187–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, P. W., Larson, J., Sells, M., Niessen, N., & Watson, A. C. (2007). Will filmed presentations of education and contact diminish mental illness stigma? Community Mental Health Journal, 43(2), 171–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cort, C. (1987). A long way to go: Minorities and the media. Media & Values, 38(Winter), online. Available at: http://www.medialit.org/media-values/media-values-articles-31-41

  • Couture, S. M., & Penn, D. L. (2003). Interpersonal contact and the stigma of mental illness: A review of the literature. Journal of Mental Health, 12, 291–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, L. & Franklin, R. (2010a). Brain injury dialogues: Synopsis; filmmaker statement; DVD credits; DVD transcripts; links of note. Brain Injury Dialogues website. Retrieved 28 July 2013a, from: http://www.braininjurydialogues.org/statement.html

  • Davies, L. & Franklin, R. (2010b). DVD transcript: Brain injury dialogues. Brain injury dialogues website. Retrieved 28 July 2013b, from: http://www.braininjurydialogues.org/BID_Feature_English.pdf

  • DesAutels, P. (2010). Sex differences and neuroethics. Philosophical Psychology, 23(1), 95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougall, R., Milne, R., Inglis, G., Onslow, H., Hesnan, J., & Knifton, L. (2012). Critical distance: How a mental health arts and film festival makes audiences think. Arts & Health, 4(2), 124–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Kawakami, K. (2003). Intergroup contact: The past, present, and future. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6(1), 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • DVA (2013). Traumatic brain injury: A guide for patients. Department of Veterans Affairs, USA. Retrieved 9 June 2013, from: http://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/tbi.pdf

  • Ernst, W. J., Trice, A. D., Gilbert, J. L., & Potts, H. (2009). Misconceptions about traumatic brain injury and recovery among nursing students. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 24(3), 213–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. W. (Ed.). (2006). Neurology and trauma. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans-Lacko, S., London, J., Japhet, S., Rusch, N., Flach, C., Corker, E., et al. (2012). Mass social contact interventions and their effect on mental health related stigma and intended discrimination. BMC Public Health, 12(489), 1–8. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans-Lacko, S., Malcolm, E., West, K., Rose, D., London, J., Rusch, N., et al. (2013). Influence of time to change’s social marketing interventions on stigma in England 2009–2011. British Journal of Psychiatry, 202(Supplement), s77–s88. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.113.126672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faigin, D. A., & Stein, C. H. (2010). The power of theater to promote individual recovery and social change. Psychiatric Services, 61(3), 306–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, J. E., & Johnson-Gerard, M. (1997). Misconceptions about traumatic brain injury among educators and rehabilitation staff: A comparative study. Rehabilitation Psychology, 42(4), 273–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faul, M., Xu, L., Wald, M., & Coronado, V. (2010). Traumatic brain injury in the United States: Emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galvin, R. D. (2005). Researching the disabled identity: Contextualising the identity transformations which accompany the onset of impairment. Sociology of Health & Illness, 27(3), 393–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga, M. (2005). The ethical brain. New York: Dana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glannon, W. (2007). Bioethics and the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glannon, W. (2009). Our brains are not us. Bioethics, 23(6), 321–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glannon, W. (2011). Brain, body, and mind: Neuroethics with a human face. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouvier, W. D., Prestholdt, P. H., & Warner, M. S. (1988). A survey of common misconceptions about head injury and recovery. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 3(4), 331–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilmette, T. J., & Paglia, M. F. (2004). The public’s misconceptions about traumatic brain injury: A follow up survey. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19(2), 183–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, H., & Minnes, P. (1999). Attitudes toward persons with down syndrome: The impact of television. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 11(1), 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanisch, C. (2006). The personal is political - The women’s liberation movement classic with a new explanatory introduction. www.carolhanisch.org. Retrieved 28 July 2013, from: http://www.carolhanisch.org/CHwritings/PIP.html

  • Hibbard, M. R., Cantor, J., Charatz, H., Rosenthal, R., Ashman, T., Gundersen, N., et al. (2002). Peer support in the community: Initial findings of a mentoring program for individuals with traumatic brain injury and their families. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 17(2), 112–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, E. P., & River, L. P. (1998). Individual strategies for coping with the stigma of severe mental illness. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 5(2), 231–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, S. R., & Callahan, B. (2001). Traumatic brain injury: State of the state. North Carolina Medical Journal, 62(6), 336–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsley, J. (2009). The secret life of movies: Schizophrenic and shamanic journey in the American cinema. Jefferson: McFarland & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hux, K., Schram, C. D., & Goeken, T. (2006). Misconceptions about brain injury: A survey replication study. Brain Injury, 20(5), 547–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, H. E. (1988). The Los Angeles head injury survey: Procedures and initial findings. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 69(6), 425–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, A., Snape, D., & Baker, G. A. (2005). Epilepsy and social identity: The stigma of a chronic neurological disorder. The Lancet Neurology, 4(3), 171–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd, D. P., & Wilson, S. L. (1999). Brain injury and identity – the role of counselling psychologists. Counselling Psychology Review, 14(3), 4–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 192–240). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knifton, L., Quinn, N., Inglis, G., & Byrne, P. (2010). Ethical issues in a national mental health arts and film festival. Journal of Ethics in Mental Health, 4(2), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodziej, M. E., & Johnson, B. T. (1996). Interpersonal contact and acceptance of persons with psychiatric disorders: A research synthesis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(6), 1387–1396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozloff, R. (1987). Networks of social support and the outcome from severe head injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 1987(2), 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, J. F., & Chu, L. D. (2005). Epidemiology. In J. S. Silvers, T. W. McAllister, & S. C. Yudofsky (Eds.), Neuropsychiatry of traumatic brain injury (pp. 3–26). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leith, K. H., Phillips, L., & Sample, P. L. (2004). Exploring the service needs and experiences of persons with TBI and their families: The south Carolina experience. Brain Injury, 18(12), 1191–1208.

    Google Scholar 

  • León-Carrión, J., De Serdio-Arias, M. L., Cabezas, F. M., Domínguez Rolda’n, J. M., Domínguez-Morales, R., Barroso, Y., Martín, J. M., et al. (2012). Recovery of cognitive function during comprehensive rehabilitation after severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 44(6), 505–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H. S. (1993). Neurobehavioral sequelae of closed head injury. In P. R. Cooper (Ed.), Head injury (pp. 525–551). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, N. (2007). Neuroethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, N. (2012). Neuroethics. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3(2), 143–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann Nelson, H. (2001). Damaged identities, narrative repair. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linden, M. A., & Boylan, A. M. (2010). ‘To be accepted as normal’: Public understanding and misconceptions concerning survivors of brain injury. Brain Injury, 24(4), 642–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linden, M. A., & Crothers, I. R. (2006). Violent, caring, unpredictable: Public views on survivors of brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21(8), 763–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linden, M. A., & McClure, J. (2012). The causal attributions of nursing students toward adolescent survivors of brain injury. Nursing Research, 61(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Linden, M. A., Rauch, R. J., & Crothers, I. R. (2005). Public attitudes towards survivors of brain injury. Brain Injury, 19(12), 1011–1017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linden, M. A., Hanna, D., & Redpath, S. J. (2007). The influence of aetiology and blame on prejudice towards survivors of brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(5), 665–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livneh, H., Martz, E., & Wilson, L. M. (2001). Denial and perceived visibility as predictors of adaptation to disability among college students. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 16(3), 227–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, M., & Ziviani, J. (1995). Stereotypes, stigma, and mental illness: Learning from fieldwork experiences. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49(10), 1002–1008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macrae, C., Bodenhausen, G. V., Milne, A. B., & Jetten, J. (1994). Out of mind but back in sight: Stereotypes on the rebound. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(5), 808–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manchester, D. (2006). Staff attributions for aggression and their relationship to treatment acceptability in brain injury rehabilitation. Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Psychology, University of Surrey. Retrieved 28 July 2013, from: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/774/

  • Marshall, L. F. (2000). Head injury: Recent past, present, and future. Neurosurgery, 47(3), 546–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinson, N. (1998). Inequality between disabilities: The different treatment of mental versus physical disabilities in long-term disability benefit plans. Baylor Law Review, 50(2), 361–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, C. K. (2000). Invisible disability. In D. O. Braithwaite & T. L. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and people with disabilities: Research and application (pp. 405–421). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayville, E., & Penn, D. L. (1998). Changing societal attitudes toward persons with severe mental illness. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 5(2), 241–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, T. W. (1992). Neuropsychiatric sequelae of head injuries. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 15(2), 395–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, T. W. (2008). Neurobehavioral sequelae of traumatic brain injury: Evaluation and management. World Psychiatry, 7(1), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure, J. (2011). The role of causal attributions in public misconceptions about brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 56(2), 85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure, J., & Abbott, J. (2009). How normative information shapes attributions for the actions of persons with traumatic brain injury. Brain Impairment, 10(2), 180–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure, J., Devlin, M. E., McDowall, J., & Wade, K. (2006). Visible markers of brain injury influence attributions for adolescents’ behaviour. Brain Injury, 20(10), 1029–1035.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure, J., Patel, G. J., & Wade, K. (2011). Attributions and expectations for the behavior of persons with brain injury: The effect of visibility of injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 26(5), 392–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConkey, R., Walsh, P. N., & Conneally, S. (1993). Neighbours’ reactions to community services: Contrasts before and after services open in their locality. Mental Handicap Research, 6, 131–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLellan, T., Bishop, A., & McKinlay, A. (2010). Community attitudes toward individuals with traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 16(4), 705–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. & BIRC (2009). Brain injury resource center website. Head Injury Hotline. Retrieved 28 July 2013, from: http://www.headinjury.com/welcome.htm

  • Miller, N. B., & Sammons, C. C. (1999). People with nonvisible disabilities. In Everybody’s different: Understanding and changing our reactions to disabilities (pp. 239–264). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, J. K., Cocozza, J. J., & Vanderwyst, D. (1980). An attempt to change the negative, stigmatizing image of mental patients through brief reeducation. Psychological Reports, 47(1), 334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, M. V., & Wehman, P. (1995). Psychosocial and emotional sequelae of individuals with traumatic brain injury: A literature review and recommendations. Brain Injury, 9(1), 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • NIH (1998). Rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injury. NIH Consensus Statement (no.109) Online, October 26–28, 1998.16(1): 1–41. Retrieved 28 July 2013, from: http://consensus.nih.gov/1998/1998TraumaticBrainInjury109html.htm

  • NIHCDP. (1999). Rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injury. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Rehabilitation of Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury: JAMA [Journal of the American Medical Association], 282(10), 974–983.

    Google Scholar 

  • NINDS (2013). Traumatic brain injury: Hope through research. Office of Communications and Public Liaison, National Institute of neurological disorders and stroke, National Institutes of Health. Retrieved 9 June 2013, from: http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/tbi/detail_tbi.htm

  • Nochi, M. (1998). “Loss of self” in the narratives of people with traumatic brain injuries: A qualitative analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 46(7), 869–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, F., & Vidal, F. (2007). Mapping the cerebral subject in contemporary culture. RECIIS - Electronic Journal of Communication, Information & Innovation in Health, 1(2), 255–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, F., & Vidal, F. (Eds.). (2011). Neurocultures: Glimpses into an expanding universe. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, C. L. (1998). Over my head: A doctor’s own story of head injury from the inside looking out. Kansas City: Andrews McMeel Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Outram, S. M., & Racine, E. (2011). Developing public health approaches to cognitive enhancement: An analysis of current reports. Public Health Ethics, 4(1), 93–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellerin, C., Rochette, A., & Racine, E. (2011). Social participation of relatives post-stroke: The role of rehabilitation and related ethical issues. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(13–14), 1055–1064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn, D. L., Guynan, K., Daily, T., Spaulding, W. D., Garbin, C. P., & Sullivan, M. (1994). Dispelling the stigma of schizophrenia: What sort of information is best? Schizophrenia Bulletin, 20(3), 567–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn, D. L., Kommana, S., Mansfield, M., & Link, B. G. (1999). Dispelling the stigma of schizophrenia: II. The impact of information on dangerousness. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 25(3), 437–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2000). Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice: Recent meta-analytic findings. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 93–114). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T.F., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 922–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, J. C., & Link, B. G. (2004). Fear of people with mental illnesses: The role of personal and impersonal contact and exposure to threat or harm. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45(1), 68–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, S. M., Griffin, J. M., Hellerstedt, W. L., Sayer, N. A., Jensen, A. C., Burgess, D. J., et al. (2011). Perceived stigma, strain, and mental health among caregivers of veterans with traumatic brain injury. Disability and Health Journal, 4(3), 177–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. (Ed.). (2000). The Everest within. Auckland: Clarity Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, N., Shulman, A., Knifton, L., & Byrne, P. (2011). The impact of a national mental health arts and film festival on stigma and recovery. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 123(1), 71–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Racine, É. (2008). Interdisciplinary approaches for a pragmatic neuroethics. The American Journal of Bioethics, 8(1), 52–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Racine, É. (2010). Pragmatic neuroethics: Improving treatment and understanding of the mind-brain. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Racine, É., & Forlini, C. (2010). Cognitive enhancement, lifestyle choice or misuse of prescription drugs? Neuroethics, 3(1), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, V., & Lyketsos, C. (2000). Neuropsychiatric sequelae of traumatic brain injury. Psychosomatics, 41(2), 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redpath, S. J., & Linden, M. A. (2004). Attitudes towards behavioural versus organic acquisition of brain injury. Brain Injury, 18(9), 861–869.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redpath, S. J., Williams, W. H., Hanna, D., Linden, M. A., Yates, P., & Harris, A. (2010). Healthcare professionals’ attitudes towards traumatic brain injury (TBI): The influence of profession, experience, aetiology and blame on prejudice towards survivors of brain injury. Brain Injury, 24(6), 802–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid-Arndt, S. A., Frank, R. G., & Hagglund, K. J. (2010). Brain injury and health policy: Twenty-five years of progress. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 25(2), 137–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinke, R. R., Corrigan, P. W., Leonhard, C., Lundin, R. K., & Kubiak, M. A. (2004). Examining two aspects of contact on the stigma of mental illness. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(3), 377–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggio, S., & Wong, M. (2009). Neurobehavioral sequelae of traumatic brain injury. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, 76(2), 163–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rillotta, F., & Nettelback, T. (2007). Effects of an awareness program on attitudes of students without an intellectual disability towards persons with an intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 32(1), 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritterfeld, U., & Jin, S. A. (2006). Addressing media stigma for people experiencing mental illness using an entertainment-education strategy. Journal of Health Psychology, 11(2), 247–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, P. (1990). Changing perceptions through contact. Disability, Handicap & Society, 5(3), 243–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roskies, A. (2002). Neuroethics for the new millennium. Neuron, 35(1), 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rydell, R. J., McConnell, A. R., Strain, L. M., Claypool, H. M., & Hugenberg, K. (2007). Implicit and explicit attitudes respond differently to increasing amounts of counterattitudinal information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(5), 867–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schomerus, G., Schwahn, C., Holzinger, A., Corrigan, P. W., Grabe, H. J., Carta, M. G., et al. (2012). Evolution of public attitudes about mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 125(6), 440–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scior, K., Addai-Davis, J., Kenyon, M., & Sheridan, J. C. (2013). Stigma, public awareness about intellectual disability and attitudes to inclusion among different ethnic groups. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57(11), 1014–1026. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01597.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Scully, J. L. (2008). Disability bioethics: Moral bodies, moral difference. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selassie, A. W., Zaloshnja, E., Langlois, J. A., Miller, T., Jones, P., & Steiner, C. (2008). Incidence of long-term disability following traumatic brain injury hospitalization, United States, 2003. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 23(2), 121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherry, M., Davies, L., & Franklin, R. (2010). DVD transcripts from the brain injury dialogues: Mark Sherry with EBBI. Brain Injury Dialogues website. Retrieved 28 July 2013, from: http://www.braininjurydialogues.org/MS_Bonus_English.pdf

  • Simpson, G., Mohr, R., & Redman, A. (2000). Cultural variations in the understanding of traumatic brain injury and brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Injury, 14(2), 125–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, S., Winkler, D., & Callaway, L. (2004). Community integration following severe traumatic brain injury: Outcomes and best practice. Brain Impairment, 5(1), 12–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedema, S. M., Ebener, D., & Grist-Gordon, V. (2012). The impact of humorous media on attitudes toward persons with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34(17), 1431–1437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Socall, D. W., & Holtgraves, T. (1992). Attitudes toward the mentally ill: The effects of label and beliefs. The Sociological Quarterly, 33(3), 435–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Springer, J. A., Parmer, J. E., & Bouman, D. E. (1997). Common misconceptions about traumatic brain injury among family members of rehabilitation patients. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 12(3), 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. L., & Colella, A. (1996). A model of factors affecting the treatment of disabled individuals in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 352–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, J., & French, S. (2000). Towards an affirmation model of disability. Disability & Society, 15(4), 569–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift, T. L., & Wilson, S. L. (2001). Misconceptions about brain injury among the general public and non-expert health professionals: An exploratory study. Brain Injury, 15(2), 149–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, L. A., Kreutzer, J. S., Demm, S. R., & Meade, M. A. (2003). Traumatic brain injury and substance abuse: A review and analysis of the literature. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 13(1–2), 165–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale, T. W., & Engberg, A. W. (2001). Suicide after traumatic brain injury: A population study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 71(4), 436–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Disability Pride and Awareness Committee (2013). Pride against prejudice: Disability awareness campaign begins November 5th. Inclusion Network. Retrieved 28 July 2013, from: http://www.inclusion.com/resdisabilitypride.html

  • Theriot, M. T. (2013). Using popular media to reduce new college students mental illness stigma. Social Work in Mental Health, 11(2), 118–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen, I. V. (1992). Late psychosocial outcome in severe traumatic brain injury. Preliminary results of a third follow-up study after 20 years. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 26, 142–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, S., Teasdale, G. M., Murray, G. D., McEwen, J., Roy, C. W., & Penny, K. I. (2000). Disability in young people and adults one year after head injury: Prospective cohort study. BMJ [British Medical Journal], 320(7250), 1631–1635.

    Google Scholar 

  • van ’t Veer, J. T., Kraan, H. F., Drosseart, S. H. C., & Modde, J. M. (2006). Determinants that shape public attitudes towards the mentally ill. Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology, 41(4), 310–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vezzoli, R., Archiati, L., Buizza, C., Pasqualetti, P., Rossi, G., & Pioli, R. (2001). Attitude towards psychiatric patients: A pilot study in a northern Italian town. European Psychiatry, 16(8), 451–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, F. (2009). Brainhood, anthropological figure of modernity. History of the Human Sciences, 22(1), 5–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volandes, A. (2007). Medical ethics on film: Towards a reconstruction of the teaching of healthcare professionals. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33(11), 678–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J., & Scior, K. (2013). Tackling stigma associated with intellectual disability among the general public: A study of two indirect contact interventions. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(7), 2200–2210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, C. A., Bogner, J., Corrigan, J. D., Clinchot, D., Mysiw, W. J., & Fugate, L. P. (1998). Primary caregivers of persons with brain injury: Life change 1 year after injury. Brain Injury, 12(6), 483–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, M. J., & Meyer, R. N. (1999). Self-determination for people with developmental disabilities and autism: Two self-advocates’ perspectives. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 14(3), 133–139. Fall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A. C., & Corrigan, P. W. (2005). Challenging public stigma: A targeted approach. In P. W. Corrigan (Ed.), On the stigma of mental illness: Practical strategies for research and social change (pp. 281–295). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B., Perry, R. P., & Magnusson, J. (1988). An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(5), 738–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2006). Neurological disorders: Public health challenges. World Health Organization. Retrieved 10 Feb 2013, from: http://www.who.int/mental_health/neurology/neurological_disorders_report_web.pdf

  • Whyte, J. (1998). Rehabilitation of individuals with traumatic brain injury: Status of the art and science. In: Office of the Director National Institutes of Health (Ed.), NIH Consensus Development Conference on Rehabilitation of Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury (pp. 23–29). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health. Available online from: https://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/TBI_1999/Pages/Abstracts.aspx

  • Widzinski, L. (2009). Review of brain injury dialogues. Media Reviews Online. Retrieved 28 July 2013, from: http://libweb.lib.buffalo.edu/emro/emroDetail.asp?Number=3924

  • Willer, B., & Corrigan, J. D. (1994). Whatever it takes: A model for community-based services. Brain Injury, 8(7), 647–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willer, B. S., Allen, K. M., Liss, M., & Zicht, M. S. (1991). Problems and coping strategies of individuals with traumatic brain injury and their spouses. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 72(7), 460–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willer, B., Johnson, W. E., Rempel, R. G., & Linn, R. (1993). A note concerning misconceptions of the general public about brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 8(5), 461–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, N. L. (1999). Mental health and the media. Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education & Development, 38(2), 68–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L. H., Cho, S. H., & Kleinman, A. (2008). Stigma of mental illness. In K. Heggenhougen (Ed.), International encyclopedia of public health (pp. 219–230). Oxford: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1997). Intersecting voices: Dilemmas of gender, political philosophy, and policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(6), 224–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zink, B. J. (2001). Traumatic brain injury outcome: Concepts for emergency care. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 37(3), 318–332.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the Novel Tech Ethics research team members for helpful discussions and feedback in relation to this project. Funding for this project was provided by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, NNF 80045, States of Mind: Emerging Issues in Neuroethics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy Mark Krahn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Krahn, T.M. (2015). Traumatic Brain Injury and the Use of Documentary Narrative Media to Redress Social Stigma. In: Clausen, J., Levy, N. (eds) Handbook of Neuroethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_126

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_126

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4706-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4707-4

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics