Skip to main content

Optimization of the MAD Algorithm for Virtual Screening

  • Protocol
Bioinformatics

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology™ ((MIMB,volume 453))

  • 4054 Accesses

Abstract

The approach termed Determination and Mapping of Activity-Specific Descriptor Value Ranges (MAD) is a conceptually novel molecular similarity method for the identification of active compounds. MAD is based on mapping of compounds to different (multiple) activity class-selective descriptor value ranges. It was recently developed in our laboratory and successfully applied in initial virtual screening trials. We have been able to show that selected molecular property descriptors can display a strong tendency to respond to unique features of compounds having similar biological activity, thus providing a basis for the approach. Accordingly, a crucial step of the MAD algorithm is the identification of activity-sensitive descriptor settings. The second critical step of MAD is the subsequent mapping of database compounds to activity-sensitive descriptor value ranges in order to identify novel active molecules. This chapter describes the optimization of the MAD approach and evaluates the second-generation algorithm on a number of different compound activity classes with a particular focus on the recognition of remote molecular similarity relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brooijmans, N., Kuntz, I. D. (2003) Molecular recognition and docking algorithms. Annu Rev Biophys Biolmol Struct 32, 335–373.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shoichet, B. K. (2004) Virtual screening of chemical libraries. Nature 432, 862–865.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kitchen, D. B., Decornez, H., Furr, J. R., et al. (2004) Structure-based vir tual screening and lead optimization: methods and applications. Nature Rev Drug Discov 3, 935–949.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bajorath, J. (2002) Integration of virtual and high-throughput screening. Nature Rev Drug Discov 1, 882–894.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Green, D. V. (2003) Virtual screening of virtual libraries. Prog Med Chem 41, 61–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stahura, F. L., Bajorath, J. (2005) New methodologies for ligand-based virtual screening. Curr Pharm Des 11, 1189–1202.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson, M., Maggiora, G. M., eds. (1990) Concepts and Applications of Molecular Similarity. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Martin, Y. C. (1992) 3D database searching in drug design. J Med Chem 35, 2145–2154.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Esposito, E. X., Hopfinger, A. J., Madura, J. D. (2004) Methods for applying the quantitative structure-activity relationship paradigm. Methods Mol Biol 275, 131–214.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Xue, L., Godden, J. W., Bajorath, J. (2003) Mini-fingerprints for virtual screening: design principles and generation of novel prototypes based on information theory. SAR QSAR Env. Res. 14, 27–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bajorath, J. (2001) Selected concepts and investigations in compound classification, molecular descriptor analysis, and virtual screening. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 41, 233–245.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gillet, V. J., Willett, P., Bradshaw, J. (2003) Similarity searching using reduced graphs. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 43, 338–345.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stahura, F. L. and Bajorath, J. (2003) Partitioning methods for the identification of active molecules. Curr Med Chem 10, 707–715.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pearlman, R. S., Smith, K. M. (1998) Novel software tools for chemical diversity. Perspect Drug Discov Design 9, 339–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jorissen, R. N., Gilson, M. K. (2005) Virtual screening of molecular databases using a support vector machine. J Chem Inf Model 44, 549–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Todeschini, R., Consonni, V. (2000) Handbook of molecular descriptors, in (Mannhold, R., Kubinyi, H., Timmer-man, H., eds.), Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 11. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Godden, J. W., Furr, J. R., Xue, L., et al. (2004) Molecular similarity analysis and virtual screening by mapping of consensus positions in binary-transformed chemical descriptor spaces with variable dimensionality. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 44, 21–29.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Eckert, H., Bajorath, J. (2006) Determination and mapping of activity-specific descriptor value ranges (MAD) for the identification of active compounds. J Med Chem 49, 2284–2293.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cramer, R. D., Jilek, R. J., Guessregen, S., et al. (2004) “Lead hopping.” Validation of topomer similarity as a superior predictor of biological activities. J Med Chem 47, 6777–6791.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Molecular Drug Data Report (MDDR). MDL Information Systems, Inc., San Leandro, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  21. MOE (Molecular Operating Environment), Chemical Computing Group, Inc., Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Irwin, J. J., Shoichet, B. K. (2005) ZINC: a free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening. J Chem Inf Model 45, 177–182.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Eckert, H., Bajorath, J. (2008). Optimization of the MAD Algorithm for Virtual Screening. In: Keith, J.M. (eds) Bioinformatics. Methods in Molecular Biology™, vol 453. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-429-6_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-429-6_18

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-60327-428-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-60327-429-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics