Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative Genomic Hybridization in Clinical and Medical Research

  • Protocol
Molecular Biomethods Handbook

Part of the book series: Springer Protocols Handbooks ((SPH))

  • 4377 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Patel AS, Hawkins AL, and Griffin CA (2000) Cytogenetics and cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 12:62–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Houldsworth J, Chaganti RSK (1994) Comparative genomic hybridization: an overview. Am J Pathol 145:1253–1260

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wells D, Levy B (2003) Cytogenetics in reproductive medicine: the contribution of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). BioEssays 25:289–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boultwood J, Fidler C (eds) (2002) Molecular analysis of cancer, Humana, Totowa, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Sudar D, et al (1992) Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science 258: 818–821

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Baksara BR, Pei J, Testa JR (2002) Comparative genomic hybridization analysis. In: Boultwood J, Fidler C (eds) molecular analysis of cancer. Humana, Totowa, NJ, pp. 45–65

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang PH, Shyong WY, Lin CH, et al (2002) Analysis of genetic aberrations in uterine adenomyosis using comparative genomic hybridization. Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 24:1–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. du Manoir S, Schrock E, Bentz M, et al (1995) Quantitative analysis of comparative genomic hybridization. Cytometry 19:27–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Piper J, Rutovitz D, Sudar D, et al (1995) Computer image analysis of comparative genomic hybridization. Cytometry 19:10–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lundsteen C, Maahr J, Christensen B, et al (1995) Image analysis in comparative genomic hybridization. Cytometry 19:42–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. du Manoir S, Kallioniemi OP, Lichter P, et al. (1995) Hardware and software requirements for quantitative analysis of comparative genomic hybridization. Cytometry 19:4–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wells D, Sherlock JK, Handyside AH, and Delhanty JD (1999) Detailed chromosomal and molecular genetic analysis of single cells by whole genome amplification and comparative genomic hybridization. Nucleic Acids Res. 27: 1214–1218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kallioniemi OP, Kallioniemi A, Piper J, et al (1994) Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequences copy number changes in solid tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 10:231–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Isola J, Devries S, Chu L, Ghazvini S, and Waldman F (1994) Analysis of changes in DNA sequence copy number by comparative genomic hybridization in archival paraffin-embedded tumor samples. Am J Pathol 145:1301–1308

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Choo KHA (1994) Methods in molecular biology: in situ hybridization protocols. Humana, Totowa, NJ

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Piper J, et al (1994) Detection and mapping of amplified DNA sequences in breast cancer by comparative genomic hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:2156–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kirchhoff M, Gerdes T, Rose H, Maahr J, Ottesen AM, Lundsteen C (1998) Detection of chromosomal gains and losses in comparative genomic hybridization analysis based on standard reference intervals. Cytometry 31:163–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tachdjian G, Aboura A, Lapierre JM, Vigie F (2000) Cytogenetic analysis from DNA by comparative genomic hybridization. Ann Genet 43:147–154

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zitzelsberger H, Lehmann L, Wemer M, and Bauchinger M (1997) Comparative genomic hybridisation for the analysis of chromosomal imbalances in solid tumours and haematological malignancies. Histochem Cell Biol 108:403–417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. James L, Varley J (1996) Preparation, labeling and detection of DNA from archival tissue sections suitable for comparative genomic hybridization. Chromosome Res 4:163–164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuukasjarvi T, Tanner M, Pennanen S, Karhu R, Visakorpi T, Isola J (1997) Optimizing DOP-PCR for universal amplification of small DNA samples in comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 18:94–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Knuutila S, Bjorkqvist A, Autio K, et al (1998) DNA copy number amplifications in human neoplasms. Am J Pathol 152:1107–1123

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Knuutila S, Aalto Y, Autio K, et al (1999) DNA copy number losses in human neoplasms. Am J Pathol 155:683–694

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Knuutila S, Autio K, Aalto Y (2000) Online access to CGH data of DNA sequence copy number changes. Am J Pathol 157:689–690

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Struski S, Doco-Fenzy M, Comillet-Lefebvre P (2002) Compilation of published comparative genomic hybridization studies. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 135: 63–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang N (2002) Cytogenetics and molecular genetics of ovarian cancer. Am J Med Genet 115:157–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kudoh K, Takano M, Koshikawa T, et al (1999) Gains of 1q21–q22 and 13q12–q14 are potential indicators for resistance to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in ovarian cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 5:2526–2531

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mills GB, Schmandt R, Gershenson D, Bast RC (1999) Should therapy of ovarian cancer patients be individualized based on underlying genetic defects? Clin Cancer Res 5:2286–2288

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Werner CA, Dohner H, Joos S, et al (1997) High-level DNA amplifications are common genetic aberrations in B-cell neoplasms. Am J Pathol 151:335–342

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bryndorf T, Kirchhoff M, Rose H, et al (1995) Comparative genomic hybridization in clinical cytogenetics. Am J Hum Genet 57:1211–1220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Levy B, Dunn TM, Kaffe S, Kardon N, Hirschhom K (1998) Clinical applications of comparative genomic hybridization. Genet Med 1:4–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Levy B, Dunn TM, Kern JH, Hirschhorn K, Kardon NB (2002) Delineation of the dup5q phenotype by molecular cytogenetic analysis in a patient with dup5q/del 5p (cri du chat). Am J Med Genet 108:192–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Xu J, Chen Z (2002) Advances in molecular cytogenetics for the evaluation of mental retardation. Am J Med Genet 117:15–24

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shayesteh L, Lu Y, Kuo WL, et al (1999) PIK3CA is implicated as an oncogene in ovarian cancer. Nat Genet 21:99–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, et al (1998) High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nature Genet 20:207–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Solinas-Toldo S, Lampel S, Stilgenbauer S, et al (1997) Matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization: biochips to screen for genomic imbalances. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 20:399–407

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Pollack JR, Perou CM, Alizadeh AA, et al (1999) Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays. Nature Genet 23:41–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Armour JAL, Barton DE, Cockbum DJ, Taypor GR (2002) The detection of large deletions or duplications in genomic DNA. Hum Mut 20:325–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Wessendorf S, Fritz B, Wrobel G, et al (2002) Automated screening for genomic imbalances using matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization. Lab Invest 82: 47–60

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Snijders AM, Nowak N, Segraves R, et al (2001) Assembly of microarrays for genome-wide measurement of DNA copy number. Nature Genet 29:263–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kirchhoff M, Gerdes T, Rose H, Maahr J, Ottesen AM, Lundsteen C, (1998) Detection of chromosomal gains and losses in comparative genomic hybridization analysis based on standard reference intervals. Cytometry 31:163–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We greatly appreciate the technical support of supervisor Dr. Jeremy A. Squire at the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (website: http://www.uto-ronto.ca/cancyto/), Miss Wen-Yuann Shyong at the Taipei Veterans General Hospital, and Dr. Wen-Ling Lee at the Department of Medicine, Cheng-Hsin Rehabilitation Center, Taipei, Taiwan. The work, which took place in the authors' laboratories, has been supported by the National Science Council (NSC 92-2314-B-075-115) and Taipei Veterans General Hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan

    Peng-Hui Wang

  2. National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Yann-Jang Chen (Faculty of life Sciences)

  3. Department of Pediatrics, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

    Yann-Jang Chen (Faculty of life Sciences)

  4. Institute of Microbiology and Immunology/Institute of Biophotonics Engineering, Yang-Ming Genome Research Center, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Chi-Hung Lin

Authors
  1. Peng-Hui Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yann-Jang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chi-Hung Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Life Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK

    John M. Walker (Professor Emeritus) & Ralph Rapley (Professor Emeritus) & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Wang, PH., Chen, YJ., Lin, CH. (2008). Comparative Genomic Hybridization in Clinical and Medical Research. In: Walker, J.M., Rapley, R. (eds) Molecular Biomethods Handbook. Springer Protocols Handbooks. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-375-6_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-375-6_15

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-60327-370-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-60327-375-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation