Abstract
Neuronal cells are probably the less studied cells regarding their heterogeneity on a single cell or population levels. One of the main problems of studying of individual neurons is the presence of long processes (axons) on differentiated adult neurons that hamper their isolation without significant damage to the cells. Therefore, the most common method to study neuronal cells is immunofluorescent microscopy of sections of the brain, which remains poorly quantitative and allows analyzing a small number of fixed cells. Also, immunofluorescent microscopy has a number of staining artifacts since histology section has high level of autofluorescence and non-specific binding of fluorescent probes. Alternative methods that could overcome disadvantages of immunofluorescent histology include flow cytometry, scanning cytometry, and laser interferometry. Flow cytometry and, to some extent of degree, scanning cytometry allow performing analysis of multiple markers with a low level of non-specific background and very robust statistics. Laser interferometry allows studies intact, alive neurons without staining. Limitations and advantages of these methods are discussed in this chapter.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Wang SS-H, Shultz JR, Burish MJ, Harrison KH, Hof PR, Towns LC et al (2008) Functional trade-offs in white matter axonal scaling. J Neurosci 28:4047–4056
MartÃnez M, Quiroga NY, Castellanos JE, Hurtado H, Hurtado H (2000) Subpoblaciones neuronales presentes en el ganglio de la raÃz dorsal. Biomedica 20:248–260
Mejias JF, Longtin A (2014) Differential effects of excitatory and inhibitory heterogeneity on the gain and asynchronous state of sparse cortical networks. Front Comput Neurosci 8:107. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2014.00107
Pennartz CMA, De Jeu MTG, Geurtsen AMS, Sluiter AA, Hermes ML (1998) Electrophysiological and morphological heterogeneity of neurons in slices of rat suprachiasmatic nucleus. J Physiol 506:775–793
Baroni F, Mazzoni A (2014) Heterogeneity of heterogeneities in neuronal networks. Front Comput Neurosci 8:161. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2014.00161
Givan AL (2011) Flow cytometry: an introduction. Methods Mol Biol 699:1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61737-950-5_1
Di Nicola M, Siena S, Bregni M, Peccatori F, Magni M, Ravagnani F et al (1993) Quantization of CD34+ peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitors for autografting in cancer patients. Int J Artif Organs 16(Suppl 5):80–82
Sack U, Scheibe R, Wötzel M, Hammerschmidt S, Kuhn H, Emmrich F et al (2006) Multiplex analysis of cytokines in exhaled breath condensate. Cytometry A 69A:169–172
Stratieva-Taneeva PA, Khaidukov SV, Kovalenko VA, Nazimov IV, Samokhvalova LV, Nesmeyanov VA (1993) Bispecific monoclonal antibodies to human interleukin 2 and horseradish peroxidase. Hybridoma 12:271–284
Shapiro HM (2003) Practical flow cytometry. Wiley, New York
Biggio M, Storace M, Mattia M (2013) Non-instantaneous synaptic transmission in spiking neuron networks and equivalence with delay distribution. BMC Neurosci 14:P267
Somers D, Panneton WM (1984) Heterogeneity of neurons in the subnucleus interpolaris of the cat. Brain Res 309:335–340
Luider J, Cyfra M, Johnson P, Auer I (2004) Impact of the new Beckman Coulter cytomics FC 500 5-Color flow cytometer on a regional flow cytometry clinical laboratory service. Lab Hematol 10:102–108
Fritschy J-M (2015) Significance of GABA(A) receptor heterogeneity: clues from developing neurons. Adv Pharmacol 73:13–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apha.2014.11.006
Walsh JJ, Han MH (2014) The heterogeneity of ventral tegmental area neurons: projection functions in a mood-related context. Neuroscience 282:101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.06.006
Brazhe (Ulyanova) NA, Erokhova LA, Churin AA, Maksimov GV (2005) The relation of different-scale membrane processes under nitric oxide influence. J Biol Phys 31:533–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10867-005-2043-1
Tychinsky VP, Kretushev AV, Vyshenskaya TV, Tikhonov AN (2005) Coherent phase microscopy in cell biology: visualization of metabolic states. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 1708:362–366
Brazhe AR, Brazhe NA, Maksimov GV, Ignatyev PS, Rubin AB, Mosekilde E et al (2008) Phase-modulation laser interference microscopy: an advance in cell imaging and dynamics study. J Biomed Opt 13:0340004. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2937213
Dobrunz LE, Stevens CF (1997) Heterogeneity of release probability, facilitation, and depletion at central synapses. Neuron 18:995–1008
Cembrowski MS, Bachman JL, Wang L, Sugino K, Shields BC, Spruston N (2016) Spatial gene-expression gradients underlie prominent heterogeneity of CA1 pyramidal neurons. Neuron 89:351–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.12.013
Acknowledgments
The work was supported by Research Grant Council-General Research Fund grant Ref. No. 14113316 (Hong Kong) to E.D.P.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Kopeikina, E., Dukhinova, M., Ponomarev, E.D. (2018). Methods of Study of Neuron Structural Heterogeneity: Flow Cytometry vs. Laser Interferometry. In: Barteneva, N., Vorobjev, I. (eds) Cellular Heterogeneity. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1745. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7680-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7680-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7679-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7680-5
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols