Abstract
Protein phosphorylation is a key signaling mechanism during the plant biotic and abiotic stress response. Signaling cascades communicate between the cell surface, where the stress is perceived, and the nucleus, where a response can be enacted. Many of these signals involve the specific, transient phosphorylation of proteins by kinases, a signal which is usually amplified through cascades. The advent of high-throughput phosphoproteomics, pioneered mainly in yeast and mammalian cells, has made it possible to discover novel phosphorylation events rapidly and efficiently in a data-dependent manner and this has greatly enlarged our understanding of the plant’s response to stress. This chapter describes a simple gel-free protocol for high-throughput phosphoproteomics, which is amenable to most labs engaged in plant stress research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Engholm-Keller K, Larsen M (2013) Technologies and challenges in large-scale phosphoproteomics. Proteomics 13:910–931
Nilsson CL (2011) Advances in quantitative phosphoproteomics. Anal Chem 84:735–746
Silva-Sanchez C, Li H, Chen S (2015) Recent advances and challenges in plant phosphoproteomics. Proteomics 15:1127–1141
Rampitsch C, Bykova NV (2012) The beginnings of crop phosphoproteomics: exploring early warning systems of stress. Front Plant Sci 3:144
Schulze B, Mentzel T, Jehle AK, Mueller K, Beeler S, Boller T, Felix G, Chinchilla D (2010) Rapid heteromerization and phosphorylation of ligand-activated plant transmembrane receptors and their associated kinase BAK1. J Biol Chem 285:9444–9451
Mann M, Ong S-E, Grønborg M, Jensen ON, Pandey A (2002) Analysis of protein phosphorylation using mass spectrometry: deciphering the phosphoproteome. Trends Biotechnol 6:261–268
Molina H, Horn DM, Tang N, Mathivanan S, Pandey A (2007) Global proteomic profiling of phosphopeptides using electron transfer dissociation tandem mass spectrometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:2199–2204
Mughal W, Nguyen L, da Silva Rosa SC, Piotrowski S, Chapman D, Du M, Alli NS, Grigull J, Halayko AJ, Aliani M, Topham MK, Epand RM, Hatch GM, Kereliuk S, McDermott JC, Rampitsch C, Dolinsky VW, Gordon JW (2015) A conserved MADS-box phosphorylation motif regulates differentiation and mitochondrial function in skeletal, cardiac, and smooth muscle cells. Cell Death Dis 6:e1944
Mazanek M, Mituloviæ G, Herzog F, Stingl C, Hutchins JR, Peters JM, Mechtler K (2007) Titanium dioxide as a chemo-affinity solid phase in offline phosphopeptide chromatography prior to HPLC-MS/MS analysis. Nat Protoc 2:1059–1069
Ficarro SB, Salomon AR, Brill LM, Mason DE, Stettler-Gill M, Brock A, Peters EC (2005) Automated immobilized metal affinity chromatography/nano-liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry platform for profiling protein phosphorylation sites. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 19:57–71
Thingholm TE, Jensen ON, Robinson PJ, Larsen MR (2007) SIMAC (sequential elution from IMAC), a phosphoproteomics strategy for the rapid separation of monophosphorylated from multiply phosphorylated peptides. Mol Cell Proteomics 7:661–671
Zhang H, Zhou H, Berke L, Heck AJR, Mohammed S, Scheres B, Menke FLH (2013) Quantitative phosphoproteomics after Auxin-stimulated lateral root induction identifies an SNX1 protein phosphorylation site required for growth. Mol Cell Proteomics 12:1158–1169
Damerval C (1986) Technical improvements in two-dimensional electrophoresis increases the level of genetic variation detected in wheat seedling proteins. Electrophoresis 7:52–54
Rampitsch C, Bykova NV (2009) Methods for functional proteomic analyses. In: Somers D et al (eds) Methods in molecular biology, vol 513. Humana press, Totowa NJ, pp 93–110
Kollipara L, Zahedi RP (2013) Protein carbamylation: in vivo modification or in vitro artefact? Proteomics 13:941–944
Boja ES, Fales HM (2001) Overalkylation of a protein digest with iodoacetamide. Anal Chem 73:3576–3582
Villén J, Gygi S (2008) The SCX/IMAC enrichment approach for global phosphorylation analysis by mass spectrometry. Nat Protoc 3:1630–1638
Kalli A, Smith GT, Sweredoski MJ, Hess S (2013) Evaluation and optimization of mass spectrometric settings during data-dependent acquisition mode: focus on LTQ-Orbitrap mass analyzers. J Proteome Res 12:3071–3086
Perkins D, Pappin D, Creasy D, Cottrell J (1999) Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 20:3551–3567
Eng JK, McCormak AL, Yates JR (1994) An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 5:976–989
Craig R, Cortens JP, Beavis RC (2004) Open source system for analyzing, validating and storing protein identification data. J Proteome Res 3:1234–1242
Keller BO, Sui J, Young AB, Whittal RM (2008) Interferences and contaminants encountered in modern mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 627:71–81
Beausoleil SA, Villén J, Gerber SA, Rush J, Gygi SP (2006) A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Nat Biotechnol 24:1285–1292
Savitski MM, Lemeer S, Boesche M, Lang M, Mathieson T, Bantscheff M, Kuster B (2011) Confident phosphorylation site localization using the Mascot delta score. Mol Cell Proteomics 10:M110.003830
Rampitsch C, Subramaniam R, Djuric-Ciganovic S, Bykova NV (2010) The phosphoproteome of Fusarium graminearum at the onset of nitrogen starvation. Proteomics 10:124–140
Villén J, Beausoleil SA, Gygi SP (2008) Evaluation of the utility of neutral-loss-dependent MS3 strategies in large-scale phosphorylation analysis. Proteomics 8:4444–4452
Acknowledgments
Funding for proteomics research to CR originates from Agriculture and Agrifood Canada. I thank Slavica Djuric-Ciganovic for critical comments on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Rampitsch, C. (2017). Phosphoproteomics Analysis for Probing Plant Stress Tolerance. In: Sunkar, R. (eds) Plant Stress Tolerance. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1631. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7136-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7136-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7134-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7136-7
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols