Skip to main content

Reproductive Toxicity

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
In Vitro Toxicology Systems

Part of the book series: Methods in Pharmacology and Toxicology ((MIPT))

  • 1720 Accesses

Abstract

The physiology of the reproductive cycle is extremely complex due to the several cell types, somatic and germ cells, that are present in the different organs and due to the finely regulated mechanisms that interact not only within reproductive tissues but also in concert with an upper regulatory and feedback control system at the level of the central nervous system. During lifetime, reproductive physiology changes dramatically, both in male and in female sex, passing from a relatively inert prepuberal stage to hormonally driven puberty entering the fertile period of life. Regular female reproductive cyclicity is interrupted by pregnancy establishment and by the development of the conceptus that become the most sensitive targets for potential environmental insults and second-generation effects. Therefore the design of relevant and reliable alternative tests capable of measuring and predicting adverse effects on the multitude of reproductive functions in the different cells/organs is an enormous task technically and scientifically.

This chapter provides an overview of the available alternative tests for reproductive toxicity, in relation to the present regulatory framework and with more emphasis on those tests and results that have been developed and obtained within international research initiatives. Tests specifically designed for detecting endocrine effects are described in more detail in another chapter of this book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hartung T, Bremer S, Casati S, Coecke S, Corvi R, Fortaner S, Gribaldo L, Halder M, Hoffmann S, Roi AJ, Prieto P, Sabbioni E, Scott L, Worth A, Zuang V (2004) A modular approach to the ECVAM principles on test validity. Altern Lab Anim 32:467–472

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Genschow E, Spielmann H, Scholz G, Seiler A, Brown N, Piersma A, Brady M, Clemann N, Huuskonen H, Paillard F, Bremer S, Becker K (2002) The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro embryotoxicity tests: results of the definitive phase and evaluation of prediction models. Altern Lab Anim 30:151–176

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Flint OP (1983) A micromass culture method for rat embryonic neural cells. J Cell Sci 61: 247–262

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Martin GR (1981) Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 78:7634–7638

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Evans MJ, Kaufman MH (1981) Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292:154–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Seiler AE, Spielmann H (2011) The validated embryonic stem cell test to predict embryotoxicity in vitro. Nat Protoc 6:961–978

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Riebeling C, Hayess K, Peters AK, Steemans M, Spielmann H, Luch A, Seiler AE (2012) Assaying embryotoxicity in the test tube: current limitations of the embryonic stem cell test (EST) challenging its applicability domain. Crit Rev Toxicol 42:443–464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buesen R, Genschow E, Slawik B, Visan A, Spielmann H, Luch A, Seiler A (2009) Embryonic stem cell test remastered: comparison between the validated EST and the new molecular FACS-EST for assessing developmental toxicity in vitro. Toxicol Sci 108: 389–400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Adler S, Basketter D, Creton S, Pelkonen O, van Benthem J, Zuang V, Andersen KE, Angers-Loustau A, Aptula A, Bal-Price A, Benfenati E, Bernauer U, Bessems J, Bois FY, Boobis A, Brandon E, Bremer S, Broschard T, Casati S, Coecke S, Corvi R, Cronin M, Daston G, Dekant W, Felter S, Grignard E, Gundert-Remy U, Heinonen T, Kimber I, Kleinjans J, Komulainen H, Kreiling R, Kreysa J, Leite SB, Loizou G, Maxwell G, Mazzatorta P, Munn S, Pfuhler S, Phrakonkham P, Piersma A, Poth A, Prieto P, Repetto G, Rogiers V, Schoeters G, Schwarz M, Serafimova R, Tahti H, Testai E, van Delft J, van Loveren H, Vinken M, Worth A, Zaldivar JM (2011) Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects-2010. Arch Toxicol 85:367–485

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nagel R (2002) DarT: The embryo test with the Zebrafish Danio rerio – a general model in ecotoxicology and toxicology. Altex 19(Suppl 1): 38–48

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zon LI, Peterson RT (2005) In vivo drug discovery in the zebrafish. Nat Rev Drug Discov 4:35–44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Woudenberg AB, Wolterbeek A, Te Brake L, Snel C, Menke A, Rubingh C, de Groot D D, Kroese D (2013) A category approach to predicting the developmental (neuro) toxicity of organotin compounds: the value of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryotoxicity test (ZET). Reprod Toxicol 41:35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bantle JA, Finch RA, Fort DJ, Stover EL, Hull M, Kumsher-King M, Gaudet-Hull AM (1999) Phase III interlaboratory study of FETAX. Part 3. FETAX validation using 12 compounds with and without an exogenous metabolic activation system. J Appl Toxicol 19:447–472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Leconte I, Mouche I (2013) Frog embryo teratogenesis assay on Xenopus and predictivity compared with in vivo mammalian studies. Methods Mol Biol 947:403–421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Morck TJ, Sorda G, Bechi N, Rasmussen BS, Nielsen JB, Ietta F, Rytting E, Mathiesen L, Paulesu L, Knudsen LE (2010) Placental transport and in vitro effects of Bisphenol A. Reprod Toxicol 30:131–137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fiorini C, Tilloy-Ellul A, Chevalier S, Charuel C, Pointis G (2004) Sertoli cell junctional proteins as early targets for different classes of reproductive toxicants. Reprod Toxicol 18:413–421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Legendre A, Froment P, Desmots S, Lecomte A, Habert R, Lemazurier E (2010) An engineered 3D blood-testis barrier model for the assessment of reproductive toxicity potential. Biomaterials 31:4492–4505

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cordelli E, Fresegna A, D’Alessio A, Eleuteri P, Spanò M, Pacchierotti F, Villani P (2007) ReProComet: a new in vitro method to assess DNA damage in mammalian sperm. Toxicol Sci 99:545–552

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sun F, Betzendahl I, Shen Y, Cortvrindt R, Smitz J, Eichenlaub-Ritter U (2004) Preantral follicle culture as a novel in vitro assay in reproductive toxicology testing in mammalian oocytes. Mutagenesis 19:13–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lazzari G, Tessaro I, Crotti G, Galli C, Hoffmann S, Bremer S, Pellizzer C (2008) Development of an in vitro test battery for assessing chemical effects on bovine germ cells under the ReProTect umbrella. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 233:360–370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Luciano AM, Franciosi F, Lodde V, Corbani D, Lazzari G, Crotti G, Galli C, Pellizzer C, Bremer S, Weimer M, Modina SC (2010) Transferability and inter-laboratory variability assessment of the in vitro bovine oocyte maturation (IVM) test within ReProTect. Reprod Toxicol 30:81–88

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schenk B, Weimer M, Bremer S, van der Burg B, Cortvrindt R, Freyberger A, Lazzari G, Pellizzer C, Piersma A, Schafer WR, Seiler A, Witters H, Schwarz M (2010) The ReProTect Feasibility Study, a novel comprehensive in vitro approach to detect reproductive toxicants. Reprod Toxicol 30:200–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Piersma AH, Bosgra S, van Duursen MB, Hermsen SA, Jonker LR, Kroese ED, van der Linden SC, Man H, Roelofs MJ, Schulpen SH, Schwarz M, Uibel F, van Vugt-Lussenburg BM, Westerhout J, Wolterbeek AP, van der Burg B (2013) Evaluation of an alternative in vitro test battery for detecting reproductive toxicants. Reprod Toxicol 38:53–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Copp AJ, Greene ND, Murdoch JN (2003) The genetic basis of mammalian neurulation. Nat Rev Genet 4:784–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Colleoni S, Galli C, Gaspar JA, Meganathan K, Jagtap S, Hescheler J, Sachinidis A, Lazzari G (2011) Development of a neural teratogenicity test based on human embryonic stem cells: response to retinoic acid exposure. Toxicol Sci 124:370–377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Colleoni S, Galli C, Gaspar JA, Meganathan K, Jagtap S, Hescheler J, Sachinidis A, Lazzari G (2012) Characterisation of a neural teratogenicity assay based on human ESCs differentiation following exposure to valproic acid. Curr Med Chem 19:6065–6071

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Balmer NV, Weng MK, Zimmer B, Ivanova VN, Chambers SM, Nikolaeva E, Jagtap S, Sachinidis A, Hescheler J, Waldmann T, Leist M (2012) Epigenetic changes and disturbed neural development in a human embryonic stem cell-based model relating to the fetal valproate syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 21: 4104–4114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Krug AK, Kolde R, Gaspar JA, Rempel E, Balmer NV, Meganathan K, Vojnits K, Baquie M, Waldmann T, Ensenat-Waser R, Jagtap S, Evans RM, Julien S, Peterson H, Zagoura D, Kadereit S, Gerhard D, Sotiriadou I, Heke M, Natarajan K, Henry M, Winkler J, Marchan R, Stoppini L, Bosgra S, Westerhout J, Verwei M, Vilo J, Kortenkamp A, Hescheler J, Hothorn L, Bremer S, van Thriel C, Krause KH, Hengstler JG, Rahnenfuhrer J, Leist M, Sachinidis A (2013) Human embryonic stem cell-derived test systems for developmental neurotoxicity: a transcriptomics approach. Arch Toxicol 87:123–143

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sipes NS, Martin MT, Reif DM, Kleinstreuer NC, Judson RS, Singh AV, Chandler KJ, Dix DJ, Kavlock RJ, Knudsen TB (2011) Predictive models of prenatal developmental toxicity from ToxCast high-throughput screening data. Toxicol Sci 124:109–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanna Lazzari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Lazzari, G., Galli, C. (2014). Reproductive Toxicity. In: Bal-Price, A., Jennings, P. (eds) In Vitro Toxicology Systems. Methods in Pharmacology and Toxicology. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0521-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0521-8_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0520-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0521-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics