Abstract
Pseudoknots are important motifs for stabilizing the structure of functional RNAs. As an example, pseudoknotted hammerhead ribozymes are highly active compared to minimal ribozymes. The design of new RNA sequences that retain the function of a model RNA structure includes taking in account pseudoknots presence in the structure, which is usually a challenge for bioinformatics tools. Our method includes using “Enzymer,” a software for designing RNA sequences with desired secondary structures that may include pseudoknots. Enzymer implements an efficient stochastic search and optimization algorithm to sample RNA sequences from low ensemble defect mutational landscape of an initial design template to generate an RNA sequence that is predicted to fold into the desired target structure.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Gupta A, Rahman R, Li K et al (2012) Identifying complete RNA structural ensembles including pseudoknots. RNA Biol 9:187–199
Han KS, Byun Y (2003) PseudoViewer2: visualization of RNA pseudoknots of any type. Nucleic Acids Res 31:3432–3440
Staple DW, Butcher SE (2005) Pseudoknots: RNA structures with diverse functions. PLoS Biol 3:e213
Forster AC, Symons RH (1987) Self-cleavage of plus and minus RNAs of a virusoid and a structural model for the active sites. Cell 49:211–220
De La Pena M, Gago S, Flores R (2003) Peripheral regions of natural hammerhead ribozymes greatly increase their self-cleavage activity. EMBO J 22:5561–5570
Khvorova A, Lescoute A, Westhof E et al (2003) Sequence elements outside the hammerhead ribozyme catalytic core enable intracellular activity. Nat Struct Biol 10:708–712
Perreault J, Weinberg Z, Roth A et al (2011) Identification of hammerhead ribozymes in all domains of life reveals novel structural variations. PLoS Comput Biol 7:e1002031
Tang X, Ren Q, Yang L et al (2018) Single transcript unit CRISPR 2.0 systems for robust Cas9 and Cas12a mediated plant genome editing. Plant Biotechnol J 17(7):1431–1445
Sack M, Stifel J, Kreft SG et al (2019) Neomycin-dependent hammerhead ribozymes for the direct control of gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods 161:35–40
Di Tomasso G, Jenkins LMM, Legault P (2016) ARiBo pull-down for riboproteomic studies based on label-free quantitative mass spectrometry. RNA 22:1760–1770
Niu T, Liu Y, Li J et al (2018) Engineering a glucosamine-6-phosphate responsive glmS ribozyme switch enables dynamic control of metabolic flux in bacillus subtilis for overproduction of n-acetylglucosamine. ACS Synth Biol 7:2423–2435
Levesque D, Choufani S, Perreault JP (2002) Delta ribozyme benefits from a good stability in vitro that becomes outstanding in vivo. RNA 8:464–477
Gao Y, Zhao Y (2014) Self-processing of ribozyme-flanked RNAs into guide RNAs in vitro and in vivo for CRISPR-mediated genome editing. J Integr Plant Biol 56:343–349
Lacroix-Labonte J, Girard N, Dagenais P et al (2016) Rational engineering of the Neurospora VS ribozyme to allow substrate recognition via different kissing-loop interactions. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6924–6934
Kobori S, Takahashi K, Yokobayashi Y (2017) Deep sequencing analysis of aptazyme variants based on a pistol ribozyme. ACS Synth Biol 6:1283–1288
Felletti M, Stifel J, Wurmthaler LA et al (2016) Twister ribozymes as highly versatile expression platforms for artificial riboswitches. Nat Commun 7
Cobaleda C, Sanchez-Garcia I (2001) RNase P: from biological function to biotechnological applications. Trends Biotechnol 19:406–411
Fiskaa T, Birgisdottir AB (2010) RNA reprogramming and repair based on trans-splicing group I ribozymes. New Biotechnol 27:194–203
Zhong J, Karberg M, Lambowitz AM (2003) Targeted and random bacterial gene disruption using a group II intron (targetron) vector containing a retrotransposition-activated selectable marker. Nucleic Acids Res 31:1656–1664
Zandi K, Butler G, Kharma N (2016) An adaptive defect weighted sampling algorithm to design pseudoknotted RNA secondary structures. Front Genet 7:129
Zadeh JN, Steenberg CD, Bois JS et al (2011) NUPACK: analysis and design of nucleic acid systems. J Comput Chem 32:170–173
Dirks RM, Pierce NA (2003) A partition function algorithm for nucleic acid secondary structure including pseudoknots. J Comput Chem 24:1664–1677
Serra MJ, Turner DH (1995) Predicting thermodynamic properties of RNA. Methods Enzymol 259:242–261
Mathews DH, Sabina J, Zuker M et al (1999) Expanded sequence dependence of thermodynamic parameters improves prediction of RNA secondary structure. J Mol Biol 288:911–940
Zadeh JN, Wolfe BR, Pierce NA (2011) Nucleic acid sequence design via efficient ensemble defect optimization. J Comput Chem 32:439–452
Dotu I, Garcia-Martin JA, Slinger BL et al (2014) Complete RNA inverse folding: computational design of functional hammerhead ribozymes. Nucleic Acids Res 42:11752–11762
Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory, NY
Najeh S, Zandi K, Kharma N, Perreault J (2019) Computational design and experimental verification of pseudoknotted ribozymes. Nucleic Acids Res 47(1):29–42
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Najeh, S., Zandi, K., Djerroud, S., Kharma, N., Perreault, J. (2021). Computer-Aided Design of Active Pseudoknotted Hammerhead Ribozymes. In: Scarborough, R.J., Gatignol, A. (eds) Ribozymes. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2167. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0716-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0716-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-0715-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-0716-9
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols