Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spinalkanalstenose: Kritik am „Spacer“

  • Literatur kompakt
  • Published:
Orthopädie & Rheuma Aims and scope

Bei lumbaler Spinalkanalstenose raten niederländische Autoren von der Implantation eines interspinösen Spreizers ab. Das minimalinvasive Verfahren war in ihrer Studie mit hohen Reoperationsraten verbunden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Moojen WA et al. Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: randomized controlled trial. BMJ 2013; 347: f6415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. http://www.springermedizin.de

    Elke Oberhofer

Authors
  1. Elke Oberhofer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oberhofer, E. Spinalkanalstenose: Kritik am „Spacer“. Orthop. Rheuma 17, 9 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15002-014-0536-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15002-014-0536-7

Search

Navigation