Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Female circumcision: A cross-cultural conundrum

  • The Commentaries
  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lane, S. and Rubenstein, R. (1996). Judging the other: responding to traditional female genital surgeries.Hastings Center Report 26(3), 38.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Olayinka, A.K. (1995). Circumcision: female circumcision. In,Encyclopedia of Bioethics, ed. by W. Reich, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kopelman, L. (1994). Female circumcision/genital mutilation and ethical relativism.Second Opinion 20(2), 55–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Foster, G. and Anderson, B. (1978).Medical Anthropology, John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Medical Humanities, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, USA

    Deborah O. Erwin & Chris Hackler

Authors
  1. Deborah O. Erwin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chris Hackler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Erwin, D.O., Hackler, C. Female circumcision: A cross-cultural conundrum. Health Care Anal 6, 35–39 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02678078

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02678078

Keywords

Search

Navigation