Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of Postoperative Urinary Tract Infection Following Benign Gynecologic Surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and Hypothesis

The objective was to develop a prediction model for urinary tract infection (UTI) after pelvic surgery.

Methods

We utilized data from three tertiary care centers of women undergoing pelvic surgery. The primary outcome was a UTI within 8 weeks of surgery. Additional variables collected included procedural data, severity of prolapse, use of mesh, anti-incontinence surgery, EBL, diabetes, steroid use, estrogen use, postoperative catheter use, PVR, history of recurrent UTI, operative time, comorbidities, and postoperative morbidity including venous thromboembolism, surgical site infection. Two datasets were used for internal validation, whereas a third dataset was used for external validation. Algorithms that tested included the following: multivariable logistic regression, decision trees (DTs), naive Bayes (NB), random forest (RF), gradient boosting (GB), and multilayer perceptron (MP).

Results

For the training dataset, containing both University of British Columbia and Mayo Clinic Rochester data, there were 1,657 patients, with 172 (10.4%) UTIs; whereas for the University of Calgary external validation data, there were a total of 392 patients with a UTI rate of 16.1% (n = 63). All models performed well; however, the GB, DT, and RF models all had an area under the curve (AUC) > 0.97. With external validation the model retained high discriminatory ability, DT: AUC = 0.88, RF: AUC = 0.88, and GB: AUC = 0.90.

Conclusions

A model with high discriminatory ability can predict UTI within 8 weeks of pelvic surgery. Future studies should focus on prospective validation and application of randomized trial models to test the utility of this model in the prevention of postoperative UTI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, [DS], and pending approval from co-investigators. The data are not publicly available due to presence of protected health information.

References

  1. Klevens RM, Edwards JR, Richards CL Jr, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Pollock DA, Cardo DM. Estimating health care-associated infections and deaths in U.S. hospitals, 2002. Public Health Rep. 2007;122(2):160–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/003335490712200205.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Scott RD. The direct medical costs of healthcare-associated infections in U.S. Hospitals and the benefits of prevention. Accessed 1 June 2023

  3. El-Nashar SA, Singh R, Schmitt JJ, et al. Urinary tract infection after hysterectomy for benign gynecologic conditions or pelvic reconstructive surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(6):1347–57. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002931.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sutkin G, Alperin M, Meyn L, Wiesenfeld HC, Ellison R, Zyczynski HM. Symptomatic urinary tract infections after surgery for prolapse and/or incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:955–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wei JT, Nygaard I, Richter HE, et al. A midurethral sling to reduce incontinence after vaginal prolapse repair. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2358–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Fok CS, McKinley K, Mueller ER, et al. Day of surgery urine cultures identify urogynecologic patients at increased risk for postoperative urinary tract infection. J Urol. 2013;189:1721–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Falagas ME, Athanasiou S, Iavazzo C, Tokas T, Antsaklis A. Urinary tract infections after pelvic floor gynecological surgery: prevalence and effect of antimicrobial prophylaxis. A systematic review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(8):1165–1172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Beeler C, Dbeibo L, Yeap YL, et al. Real world utilization of nurse-driven urinary catheter removal protocol in patients with epidural pain catheters. Am J Infect Control. 2022;50(4):396–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2021.09.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanaee MS, Hutcheon JA, Larouche M, Brown HL, Lee T, Geoffrion R. Urinary tract infection prevention after midurethral slings in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(12):1514–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13661.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dieter AA, Amundsen CL, Edenfield AL, et al. Oral antibiotics to prevent postoperative urinary tract infection. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(1):96–103. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Foxman B, Cronenwett AE, Spino C, Berger MB, Morgan DM. Cranberry juice capsules and urinary tract infection after surgery: results of a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(2):194.e1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.04.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mooren ES, Liefers WJ, de Leeuw JW. Cranberries after pelvic floor surgery for urinary tract infection prophylaxis: a randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;39(5):1543–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMC Med. 2015;13(1):1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Luo W, Phung D, Tran T, et al. Guidelines for developing and reporting machine learning predictive models in biomedical research: a multidisciplinary view. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(12):e323.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sanaee MS, Pan K, Lee T, Koenig NA, Geoffrion R. Urinary tract infection after clean-contaminated pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study and prediction model. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(9):1821–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04119-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gould CV, Umscheid CA, Agarwal RK, Kuntz G, Pegues DA. Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guideline for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections 2009. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31(4):319–26. https://doi.org/10.1086/651091.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Riley RD, Ensor J, Snell KIE, et al. Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model. BMJ. 2020;18(368):m441. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Thomas-White KJ, Gao X, Lin H, et al. Urinary microbes and postoperative urinary tract infection risk in urogynecologic surgical patients. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(12):1797–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3767-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Flanagan JM, Read C, Shindul-Rothschild J. Factors associated with the rate of sepsis after surgery. Crit Care Nurse. 2020;40(5):e1–9. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2020171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Estimating the additional hospital inpatient cost and mortality associated with selected hospital-acquired conditions. https://www.ahrq.gov/hai/pfp/haccost2017-results.html. Accessed 14 July 2023.

  21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI). https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/guidelines/cauti/index.html. Accessed 14 July 2023.

  22. Burke JP. Infection control—a problem for patient safety. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(7):651–6. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMhpr020557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2021 Urinary tract infection protocol change. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/training/2021/uti-508.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2023.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S. Yurick: project development, model development, manuscript writing; S. Ray: model development, manuscript writing; D. Sheyn: project development, model development, data collection, model development, manuscript writing; S. El-Nashar: data collection, manuscript writing, manuscript editing; E. Brennand: data collection, manuscript writing; S. Kim-Fine: data collection, manuscript writing; M. Sanaee: manuscript writing, manuscript editing; S. Regan: manuscript writing, manuscript editing; R. Geoffrion: data collection, manuscript writing; J. Occhino: data collection, manuscript writing; A. Hijaz: manuscript writing, manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Sheyn.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Additional information

Handling Editor: G.Alessandro Digesu

Editor in Chief: Maria A. Bortolini

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 12 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yurick, S., Ray, S., El-Nashar, S. et al. Prediction of Postoperative Urinary Tract Infection Following Benign Gynecologic Surgery. Int Urogynecol J (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05773-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05773-9

Keywords

Navigation