Volume 12, Issue 1

Search all Neuroethics articles

April 2019

Political Implications of Moral Enhancement

Issue Editors:

Norbert Paulo,
Christoph Bublitz

11 articles in this issue

Introduction: Political Implications of Moral Enhancement
Norbert Paulo
Christoph Bublitz
Editorial Note 13 January 2018 Pages: 1 - 3
The Tragedy of Biomedical Moral Enhancement
Stefan Schlag
Original Paper 03 November 2016 Pages: 5 - 17
Biomedical Moral Enhancement – not a Lever without a Fulcrum
Ingmar Persson
Julian Savulescu
Brief Communication 02 September 2017 Pages: 19 - 22
Saving the World through Sacrificing Liberties? A Critique of some Normative Arguments in Unfit for the Future
Jan Christoph Bublitz
Original Paper 02 June 2016 Pages: 23 - 34
The Irrelevance of a Moral Right to Privacy for Biomedical Moral Enhancement
Ingmar Persson
Julian Savulescu
Brief Communication 24 August 2017 Pages: 35 - 37
Why Internal Moral Enhancement Might Be politically Better than External Moral Enhancement
John Danaher
Original Paper 29 July 2016 Pages: 39 - 54
Pow(d)er to the People? Voter Manipulation, Legitimacy, and the Relevance of Moral Psychology for Democratic Theory
Norbert Paulo
Christoph Bublitz
Original Paper Open access 17 June 2016 Pages: 55 - 71
Procedural Moral Enhancement
G. Owen Schaefer
Julian Savulescu
Original Paper Open access 20 April 2016 Pages: 73 - 84
Can Medical Interventions Serve as ‘Criminal Rehabilitation’?
Gulzaar Barn
Original Paper Open access 27 June 2016 Pages: 85 - 96
The Right to Bodily Integrity and the Rehabilitation of Offenders Through Medical Interventions: A Reply to Thomas Douglas
Elizabeth Shaw
Original Paper Open access 22 September 2016 Pages: 97 - 106
Nonconsensual Neurocorrectives and Bodily Integrity: a Reply to Shaw and Barn
Thomas Douglas
Original Paper Open access 24 August 2016 Pages: 107 - 118

Volume 12, Issue 1

Introduction: Political Implications of Moral Enhancement

The Tragedy of Biomedical Moral Enhancement

Biomedical Moral Enhancement – not a Lever without a Fulcrum

Saving the World through Sacrificing Liberties? A Critique of some Normative Arguments in Unfit for the Future

The Irrelevance of a Moral Right to Privacy for Biomedical Moral Enhancement

Why Internal Moral Enhancement Might Be politically Better than External Moral Enhancement

Pow(d)er to the People? Voter Manipulation, Legitimacy, and the Relevance of Moral Psychology for Democratic Theory

Procedural Moral Enhancement

Can Medical Interventions Serve as ‘Criminal Rehabilitation’?

The Right to Bodily Integrity and the Rehabilitation of Offenders Through Medical Interventions: A Reply to Thomas Douglas

Nonconsensual Neurocorrectives and Bodily Integrity: a Reply to Shaw and Barn

Navigation