Response: Dempster and Corkill's “Interference and Inhibition in Cognition and Behavior: Unifying Themes for Educational Psychology” Roger BruningTerri Flowerday OriginalPaper Pages: 89 - 96
Interference, Inhibition, and Learning Disability: A Commentary on Dempster and Corkill Kenneth A. KavaleSteven R. Forness OriginalPaper Pages: 97 - 104
Understanding Interference and Inhibition Processes from a Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Perspective: Comments on Dempster and Corkill Paul R. Pintrich OriginalPaper Pages: 105 - 115
Putting the “Is for” Back into the Study of Cognition and Behavior: Commentary on “Unifying Themes for Educational Psychology” Gary D. Phye OriginalPaper Pages: 117 - 127
Interference and Inhibition in Cognition and Behavior: Comments on the Commentaries Frank N. DempsterAlice J. Corkill OriginalPaper Pages: 129 - 141
Further Reflections on Hypothesis Testing and Editorial Policy for Primary Research Journals Joel R. LevinDaniel H. Robinson OriginalPaper Pages: 143 - 155
Journal Editorial Policies Regarding Statistical Significance Tests: Heat Is to Fire as p Is to Importance Bruce Thompson OriginalPaper Pages: 157 - 169
