Skip to main content
Log in

Use of spent foundry sand and fly ash for the development of green self-consolidating concrete

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the United States alone, the foundry industry discards up to 10 million tons of sand each year, offering up a plentiful potential resource to replace sand in concrete products. However, because the use of spent foundry sand (SFS) is currently very limited in the concrete industry, this study investigates whether SFS can successfully be used as a sand replacement material in cost-effective, green, self-consolidating concrete (SCC). In the study, SCC mixtures were developed to be even more inexpensive and environmentally friendly by incorporating Portland cement with fly ash (FA). Tests done on SCC mixtures to determine fresh properties (slump flow diameter, slump flow time, V-funnel flow time, yield stress, and relative viscosity), compressive strength, drying shrinkage and transport properties (rapid chloride permeability and volume of permeable pores) show that replacing up to 100% of sand with SFS and up to 70% Portland cement with FA enables the manufacture of green, lower cost SCC mixtures with proper fresh, mechanical and durability properties. The beneficial effects of FA compensate for some possible detrimental effects of SFS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siddique R, de Schutter G, Noumowe A (2009) Effect of used-foundry sand on the mechanical properties of concrete. Constr Build Mater 23(2):976–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Siddique R, Noumowe A (2008) Utilization of spent foundry sand in controlled low-strength materials and concrete. Resour Conserv Recycl 53(1–2):27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Naik TR (1989) Foundry industry by-products utilization. Report No. CBU-1989-01, Center for By-Products Utilization. College of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

  4. Naik TR, Singh SS, Tharaniyil MP, Wendorf RB (1996) Application of foundry by-product materials in manufacture of concrete and masonry products. ACI Mater J 93(1):41–50

    Google Scholar 

  5. Siddique R, Gupta R, Kaur I (2007) Effect of spent foundry sand as partial replacement of fine aggregate on the properties of concrete. In: 22nd Int conference on solid waste technology and management, Widener University, Philadelphia, USA, pp 1386–1396

  6. Khatib JM, Ellis DJ (2001) Mechanical properties of concrete containing foundry sand. ACI Spec Publ SP–200:733–748

    Google Scholar 

  7. Naik TR, Kraus RN, Chun YM, Ramme WB, Singh SS (2003) Properties of field manufactured cast-concrete products utilizing recycled materials. J Mater Civ Eng 15(4):400–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bakis R, Koyuncu H, Demirbas A (2006) An investigation of waste foundry sand in asphalt concrete mixtures. Waste Manag Res 24(3):269–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fiore S, Zanetti MC (2007) Foundry wastes reuse and recycling in concrete production. Am J Environ Sci 3(3):135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kraus RN, Naik TR, Ramme BW, Kumar R (2009) Use of foundry silica-dust in manufacturing economical self-consolidating concrete. Constr Build Mater 23(11):3439–3442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sahmaran M, Yaman IO, Tokyay M (2009) Transport and mechanical properties of self consolidating concrete with high volume fly ash. Cem Concr Compos 31(2):99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bouzoubaa N, Lachemi M (2001) Self-compacting concrete incorporating high volumes of Class F fly ash: preliminary results. Cem Concr Res 31(3):413–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Foundry Industry Recycling Starts Today (FIRST) (2004) Foundry sand facts for civil engineers. Federal Highway Administration Environmental Protection Agency, Washington

  14. Winkler ES, Bolshakov AA (2000) Characterization of foundry sand waste. Chelsea Center for Recycling and Economic Development. University of Massachusetts at Lowell, Lowell

    Google Scholar 

  15. The European guidelines for self-compacting concrete: specification, production and use. EFNARC, May 2005, 63p, http://www.efnarc.org/pdf/SCCGuidelinesMay2005.pdf

  16. Wallevik OH (2000) The BML viscometer, The viscometer 4. ConTec operating manual, version 2000, ConTec Ltd, pp 20–70

  17. Tikalsky P, Gaffney M, Regan R (2000) Properties of controlled low-strength material containing foundry sand. ACI Mater J 97(6):698–702

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bhat ST, Lovell CW (1996) Design of flowable fill: waste foundry sand as a fine aggregate. Transp Res Rec 1546:70–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Esping O (2007) Early age properties of self-compacting concrete—effects of fine aggregate and limestone filler. PhD Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden

  20. Jau WC, Yang CT (2010) Development of a modified concrete rheometer to measure the rheological behavior of conventional and self-consolidating concretes. Cem Concr Compos 32:450–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Şahmaran M, Yaman İÖ, Tokyay M (2007) Development of high-volume low-lime and high-lime fly-ash-incorporated self-consolidating concrete. Mag Concr Res 59(2):97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Erdem TK, Khayat KH, Yahia A (2009) Correlating rheology of SCC to corresponding concrete-equivalent mortar. ACI Mater J 106(2):154–160

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lachemi M, Hossain KMA, Lambros V, Bouzoubaa N (2003) Development of cost-effective self-consolidating concrete incorporating fly ash, slag cement, or viscosity-modifying admixtures. ACI Mater J 100(5):419–425

    Google Scholar 

  24. Maslehuddin M, Saricimen H, Al-Mani A (1987) Effect of fly ash addition on the corrosion resisting characteristics of concrete. ACI Mater J 84(1):42–50

    Google Scholar 

  25. Şahmaran M, Lachemi M, Hossain KMA, Ranade R, Li VC (2009) Influence of aggregate type and size on ductility and mechanical properties of engineered cementitious composites. ACI Mater J 106(3):308–316

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shi C (2004) Effect of mixing proportions of concrete on its electrical conductivity and rapid chloride permeability test results. Cem Concr Res 34(3):537–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kuroda M, Watanabe T, Terashi N (2000) Increase of bond strength at interfacial transition zone by the use of fly ash. Cem Concr Res 30(2):253–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mehta PK, Monteiro PJM (2006) Concrete: microstructure, properties, and materials. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shehata MH, Thomas MDA, Bleszynski RF (1999) The effect of fly ash composition on the chemistry of pore solution. Cem Concr Res 29(12):1915–1920

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada, and the Canada Research Chair Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Lachemi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Şahmaran, M., Lachemi, M., Erdem, T.K. et al. Use of spent foundry sand and fly ash for the development of green self-consolidating concrete. Mater Struct 44, 1193–1204 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-010-9692-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-010-9692-7

Keywords

Navigation