Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do Tumor Grade and Location Affect Survival in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma? Survival Analysis of 302 Cases of pT3N0M0 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

  • Thoracic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) cancer staging manual incorporates tumor grade and location for staging pT2–3N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Patients with pT3N0M0, classified as stage IIa according to the 6th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual, can now be classified as stage Ib, IIa, or IIb. We aimed to discuss whether these changes affect survival and determine other potential prognostic factors.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 302 patients with postoperative pathologic stage T3N0M0 who underwent esophagectomy between 1990 and 2005 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to identify prognostic factors for survival and used the Kaplan–Meier method to compare survival difference in each prognostic factor, including tumor grade and location.

Results

The 5-year overall survival rate was 46 %, with a median survival of 1,244.5 days. Gender, age, alcohol consumption, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and number of removed lymph nodes were independent prognostic factors in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Smoking was also a prognostic factor in survival analysis by the Kaplan–Meier method. However, histologic tumor grade and location had no significant influence on patient survival.

Conclusions

Age, gender, alcohol consumption, FEV1, number of removed lymph nodes, and cigarette smoking are independent prognostic factors in patients with pT3N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, tumor grade and location may not be as strong predictors in these patients as indicated in the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lin CS, Chang SC, Wei YH, et al. Prognostic variables in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:1056–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wong J. Esophageal resection for cancer: the rationale of current practice. Am J Surg. 1987;153:18–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th edition. New York: Springer; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hsu PK, Wu YC, Chou TY, Huang CS, Hsu WH. Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor–node–metastasis staging system in patients with resected esophageal carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:1024–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rice TW, Rusch VW, Apperson-Hansen C, et al. Worldwide esophageal cancer collaboration. Dis Esophagus. 2009;22:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Eloubeidi MA, Desmond R, Arguedas MR, Reed CE, Wilcox CM. Prognostic factors for the survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma in the U.S.: the importance of tumor length and lymph node status. Cancer. 2002;95:1434–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Altorki NK, Zhou XK, Stiles B, et al. Total number of resected lymph nodes predicts survival in esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2008;248:221–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Elsayed H, Whittle I, McShane J, et al. The influence of age on mortality and survival in patients undergoing oesophagogastrectomies. A seven-year experience in a tertiary center. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;11:65–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kountourakis P, Correa AM, Hofstetter WL, et al. Combined modality therapy of cT2N0M0 esophageal cancer: the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center experience. Cancer. 2011;117:925–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sundelöf M, Lagergren J, Ye W. Patient demographics and lifestyle factors influencing long-term survival of oesophageal cancer and gastric cardia cancer in a nationwide study in Sweden. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44:1566–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lagarde SM, Reitsma JB, Maris AKD, et al. Preoperative prediction of the occurrence and severity of complications after esophagectomy for cancer with use of a nomogram. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:1938–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ. Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2241–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee CH, Lee JM, Wu DC, et al. Independent and combined effects of alcohol intake, tobacco smoking and betel quid chewing on the risk of esophageal cancer in Taiwan. Int J Cancer. 2005;113:475–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gao YT, McLaughlin JK, Blot WJ, et al. Risk factors for esophageal cancer in Shanghai, China. I. Role of cigarette smoking and alcohol drinking. Int J Cancer. 1994;58:192–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Khan NA, Teli MA, Mohib-Ul Haq M, Bhat GM, Lone MM, Afroz F. A survey of risk factors in carcinoma esophagus in the valley of Kashmir, Northern India. J Cancer Res Ther. 2011;7:15–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shitara K, Matsuo K, Hatooka S, et al. Heavy smoking history interacts with chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer prognosis: a retrospective study. Cancer Sci. 2010;101:1001–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dickson GH, Singh KK, Escofet X, Kelley K. Validation of a modified GTNM classification in peri-junctional oesophago-gastric carcinoma and its use as a prognostic indicator. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001;27:641–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wijnhoven BP, Tran KT, Esterman A, Watson DI, Tilanus HW. An evaluation of prognostic factors and tumor staging of resected carcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg. 2007;245:717–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Roder JD, Busch R, Stein HJ, Fink U, Siewert JR. Ratio of invaded to removed lymph nodes as a predictor of survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus. Br J Surg. 1994;81:410–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bogoevski D, Onken F, Koenig A, et al. Is it time for a new TNM classification in esophageal carcinoma? Ann Surg. 2008;247:633–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Doki Y, Ishikawa O, Takachi K, et al. Association of the primary tumor location with the site of tumor recurrence after curative resection of thoracic esophageal carcinoma. World J Surg. 2005;29:700–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (09YKPY51); the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China (2010B31500010); and the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program; 2009AA02Z421). The authors would like to thank Enago (www.enago.cn) for the English language review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guowei Ma MD, PhD.

Additional information

The first two authors contributed equally to this work, and both should be considered first author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Situ, D., Wei, W., Lin, P. et al. Do Tumor Grade and Location Affect Survival in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma? Survival Analysis of 302 Cases of pT3N0M0 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 20, 580–585 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2656-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2656-0

Keywords

Navigation