Skip to main content
Log in

Combined Modality Therapy for Rectal Cancer: The Relative Value of Posttreatment Versus Pretreatment CEA as a Prognostic Marker for Disease Recurrence

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the prognostic significance of the first postsurgery carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) and total mesorectal excision.

Methods

A total of 100 patients underwent nCRT and had baseline and posttreatment CEA levels recorded within 6 months of surgery. The median radiotherapy dose was 50.4 Gy. Eighty-six patients received adjuvant 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Prognostic factors were analyzed for possible associations with freedom from failure (FFF) by univariate and multivariate analyses. Median follow-up was 30 months.

Results

The median CEA (ng/ml) levels at baseline before nCRT, after nCRT, and after total mesorectal excision were 3.6, 1.7, and 1.3, respectively. Pathologic complete response was observed in 22%. FFF at 36 months was 78%. Local failure and distant failure occurred in 4 and 20% of the patients, respectively. On univariate analysis, pathologic complete response, margin status, and both pretreatment and postsurgery CEA levels were associated with recurrence (all P < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, pathologic complete response (P < 0.007), margin status (P < 0.001), and postsurgery CEA level (P = 0.003), but not baseline CEA level (P = 0.2), were found to be associated with recurrence.

Conclusions

After nCRT for rectal cancer, postsurgery CEA level may have more prognostic value than pretreatment level. Patients with a postsurgery CEA level of >2.5 ng/ml have higher rates of recurrence and may warrant closer surveillance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Locker GY, Hamilton S, Harris J, et al. ASCO 2006 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:5313–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wanebo HJ, Rao B, Pinsky CM, et al. Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level as a prognostic indicator in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1978;299:448–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldstein MJ, Mitchell EP. Carcinoembryonic antigen in the staging and follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer Invest. 2005;23:338–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boey J, Cheung HC, Lai CK, Wong J. A prospective evaluation of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in the management of colorectal carcinoma. World J Surg. 1984;8:279–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Slentz K, Senagore A, Hibbert J, Mazier WP, Talbott TM. Can preoperative and postoperative CEA predict survival after colon cancer resection? Am Surg. 1994;60:528–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin JK, Lin CC, Yang SH, et al. Early postoperative CEA level is a better prognostic indicator than is preoperative CEA level in predicting prognosis of patients with curable colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26:1135–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Berman JM, Cheung RJ, Weinberg DS. Surveillance after colorectal cancer resection. Lancet. 2000;355(9201):395–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1731–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Aschele C, Lonardi S. Multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer: medical oncology. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:1908–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rodel C, Martus P, Papadoupolos T, et al. Prognostic significance of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8688–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Glynne-Jones R, Mawdsley S, Novell JR. The clinical significance of the circumferential resection margin following preoperative pelvic chemo-radiotherapy in rectal cancer: why we need a common language. Colorectal Dis. 2006;8:800–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Topova L, Hellmich G, Puffer E, et al. Prognostic value of tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy in rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:401–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tan E, Gouvas N, Nicholls RJ, Ziprin P, Xynos E, Tekkis PP. Diagnostic precision of carcinoembryonic antigen in the detection of recurrence of colorectal cancer. Surg Oncol. 2009;18:15–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Iwanicki-Caron I, Di Fiore F, Roque I, et al. Usefulness of the serum carcinoembryonic antigen kinetic for chemotherapy monitoring in patients with unresectable metastasis of colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3681–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang WS, Lin JK, Lin TC, et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen in monitoring of response to systemic chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2001;16:96–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Perez RO, Sao Juliao GP, Habr-Gama A, et al. The role of carcinoembriogenic antigen in predicting response and survival to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for distal rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:1137–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ishihara S, Watanabe T, Kiyomatsu T, Yasuda K, Nagawa H. Prognostic significance of response to preoperative radiotherapy, lymph node metastasis, and CEA level in patients undergoing total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010;25:1417–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Park JW, Lim SB, Kim DY, et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen as a predictor of pathologic response and a prognostic factor in locally advanced rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;74:810–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jang NY, Kang SB, Kim DW, et al. The role of carcinoembryonic antigen after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:245–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Renehan AG, Egger M, Saunders MP, O’Dwyer ST. Impact on survival of intensive follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ. 2002;324(7341):813.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Figueredo A, Rumble RB, Maroun J, et al. Follow-up of patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer: a practice guideline. BMC Cancer. 2003;3:26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stanley L. Liauw MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Song, S., Hong, J.C., McDonnell, S.E. et al. Combined Modality Therapy for Rectal Cancer: The Relative Value of Posttreatment Versus Pretreatment CEA as a Prognostic Marker for Disease Recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol 19, 2471–2476 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2266-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2266-x

Keywords

Navigation