Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Management of the Axilla in Women With Breast Cancer: Current Clinical Practice and a New Selective Targeted Approach

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Axillary nodal status is the most important prognostic factor for patients with breast cancer. Clinical assessment and imaging modalities are not always reliable. Surgical removal and histopathological examination of axillary lymph nodes remain essential methods of staging the axilla. However, the optimal management of the axilla remains uncertain.

Methods

We performed Medline searches to identify relevant systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and nonrandomized and randomized controlled trials for the past 5 years (up to December 2007), as well as important historical articles and clinical guidelines relating to management of the axilla in women with breast cancer.

Results

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has been the standard surgical approach for many years. It is, however, associated with marked morbidity; survival benefit remains uncertain. Axillary node sampling, widely practiced in the United Kingdom, is a reliable alternative procedure in staging the axilla, with less morbidity. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become an accurate method for staging the axilla in women with operable, clinically node-negative breast cancer. SLNB alone appears to be a safe and acceptable procedure for patients with uninvolved SLNs. Completion ALND or axillary radiotherapy remains the standard treatment for patients with tumor-involved SLNs. SLNB is associated with less morbidity than ALND. However, long-term follow-up and therapeutic outcomes are being awaited from randomized controlled trials.

Conclusions

Several procedures are available for staging and treating the axilla. A tailored surgical approach, with careful assessment of risk-benefit and patient preference, is guiding the evolving modern management of the axilla for women with breast cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

FIG. 1

References

  1. Halsted W. The results of operations for the cure of cancer of the breast performed at the Johns Hopkins Hospitals from June 1889 to January 1894. Johns Hopkins Hosp Bull 1895; 4:297–302.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fisher B. Seminars of Bernard Fisher 1960―nature of cancer as systemic disease? Bull Soc Int Chir 1972; 31:604–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fisher B, Slack N, Katrych D, et al. Ten year follow-up results of patients with carcinoma of the breast in a co-operative clinical trial evaluating surgical adjuvant chemotherapy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1975; 140:528–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:1227–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:1233–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher B, Redmond C, Dimitrov NV, et al. A randomized clinical trial evaluating sequential methotrexate and fluorouracil in the treatment of patients with node-negative breast cancer who have estrogen-receptor-negative tumors. N Eng J Med 1989; 320:473–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Patani NR, Dwek MV, Douek M. Predictors of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: a systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol 2006; 33:409–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Veronesi U, Luini A, Galimberti V, et al. Extent of metastatic axillary involvement in 1446 cases of breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 1990; 16:127–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Klauber-DeMore N, Bevilacqua JL, Van Zee KJ, et al. Comprehensive review of the management of internal mammary lymph node metastases in breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2001; 193:547–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Veronesi U, Cascinella N, Greco M, et al. Prognosis of breast cancer patients after mastectomy and dissection of internal mammary nodes. Ann Surg 1985; 202:702–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Veronesi U, Marubini E, Mariani L, et al. The dissection of internal mammary nodes does not improve the survival of breast cancer patients. 30-year results of a randomised trial. Eur J Cancer 1999; 35:1320–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Morton DL, Wen DR, Wong JH, et al. Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma. Arch Surg 1992; 127:392–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Romrell LJ, Bland KI. Anatomy of the breast, axilla, chest wall and related metastatic sites. In: Bland KI, Copeland EM, eds. The Breast. 3rd ed. London: Saunders, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Turner-Warwick RT. The lymphatics of the breast. Br J Surg 1959; 46:574–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kiricuta CI, Tausch J. A mathematical model of axillary lymph node involvement based on 1446 complete axillary dissections in patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer 1992; 69:2496–501.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fisher B, Wolmark N, Bauer M, et al. The accuracy of clinical nodal staging and of limited axillary dissection as a determinant of histologic nodal status in carcinoma of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981; 152:765–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Graverson HP, Toft MB, Andersen JA, et al. Breast cancer: risk of axillary recurrence in node-negative patients following partial dissection of the axilla. Eur J Surg Oncol 1988; 14:407–12.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maunsell E, Brisson J, Deschenes L. Arm problems and psychological distress after surgery for breast cancer. Can J Surg 1993; 36:315–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hack TF, Cohen L, Katz J, et al. Physical and psychological morbidity after axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17:143–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Velanovich V, Szymanski W. Quality of life of breast cancer patients with lymphedema. Am J Surg 1999; 177:184–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Petrek JA, Heelan MC. Incidence of breast carcinoma related lymphedema. Cancer 1998; 83:2776–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ozaslan C, Kuru B. Lymphedema after treatment of breast cancer. Am J Surg 2004; 187:69–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gardner B, Feldman J. Are positive axillary nodes in breast cancer markers for incurable disease? Ann Surg 1993; 218:270–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Harris JR, Osteen RT. Patients with early breast cancer benefit from effective axillary treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1985; 5:17–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Orr RK. The impact of prophylactic axillary node dissection on breast cancer survival: a Bayesian meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 1999; 6:109–16.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Carter CL, Allen C, Henson DE. Relation of tumour size, lymph node status and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases. Cancer 1989; 63:181–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Silverstein MJ, Gierson ED, Waisman JR, et al. Axillary lymph node dissection for T1a breast carcinoma. Is it indicated? Cancer 1994; 73:664.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Forrest APM, Stewart HJ, Roberts MM, et al. Simple mastectomy and axillary node sampling (pectoral node biopsy) in the management of primary breast cancer. Ann Surg 1982; 196:371–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Steele RJC, Forrest APM, Gibson T, et al. The efficacy of lower axillary sampling in obtaining lymph node status in breast cancer: a controlled randomized trial. Br J Surg 1985; 72:368–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lambah A, Dixon JM, Prescott RJ, et al. Randomised study of axillary clearance versus four node sampling. Eur J Cancer 2001; 37(Suppl 5):2.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Forrest APM, Everington D, McDonald CC, et al. The Edinburgh randomized trial of axillary sample or clearance after mastectomy. Br J Surg 1995; 82:1504–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Chetty U, Jack W, Prescott RJ, et al. Management of the axilla in operable breast cancer treated by breast conservation: a randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 2000; 87:163–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tanaka K, Yamamoto D, Kanematsu S, et al. A four node axillary sampling trial on breast cancer patients. Breast 2006; 15:203–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gaston MS, Dixon JM. A survey of surgical management of the axilla in UK breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 2004; 40:1738–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ahl J, Holmberg L, Bergh J, et al. Five-node biopsy of the axilla: an alternative to axillary dissection of levels I-II in operable breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2002; 28:97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cabanas RM. An approach for the treatment of penile cancer. Cancer 1977; 39:456–66.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Morton DL, Wanek L, Nizze JA, et al. Improved long-term survival after lymphadenectomy of melanoma metastatic to regional lymph nodes. Analysis of prognostic factors in 1134 patients from John Wayne Cancer Clinic. Ann Surg 1991; 214:491–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Krag DN, Weaver DL, Alex JC, et al. Surgical resection and radiolocalisation of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe. Surg Oncol 1993, 2:335–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg 1994; 220:391–401.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Albertini JJ, Lyman GH, Cox C, et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the patient with breast cancer. JAMA 1996; 276:1818–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kim T, Giuliano AE, Lyman G. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast carcinoma. Cancer 2006; 106:4–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Linehan DC, Hill AD, Tran KN, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: unfiltered radioisotope is superior to filtered. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 188:377–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Lyew MA, Gamblin TC, Ayoub M. Systemic anaphylaxis associated with intramammary isosulfan blue injection used for sentinel node detection under general anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2000; 93:1145–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kuerer HM, Wayne JD, Ross MI. Anaphylaxis during breast cancer lymphatic mapping. Surgery 2001; 129:119–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Simmons R, Thevarajah S, Brennan M, et al. Methylene blue dye as an alternative to isosulfan blue dye for sentinel node localization. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10:242–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Varghese P, Mostafa A, Abdel-Rahman AT, et al. Methylene blue dye versus combined dye-radioactive tracer technique for sentinel lymph node localisation in early breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2007; 33:147–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Blessing W, Stolier A, Teng S, et al. A comparison of methylene blue and lymphazurin in breast cancer sentinel node mapping. Am J Surg 2002; 184:341–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Thevarajah S, Huston TL, Simmons RM. A comparison of the adverse reactions associated with isosulfan blue versus methylene blue dye in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer. Am J Surg 2005; 189:236–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V, et al. Sentinel-node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph nodes. Lancet 1997; 349:1864–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Linehan DC, Hill ADK, Akhurst T, et al. Intradermal radiocolloid and intraparenchymal blue dye injection optimize sentinel node identification in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 1999; 6:450–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. McMasters KM, Wong SL, Martin RCG 2nd, et al. Dermal injection of radioactive colloid is superior to peritumoral injection for breast cancer sentinel lymph node biopsy: results of a multiinstitutional study. Ann Surg 2001; 233:676–87.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Kern KA. Sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer using subareolar injection of blue dye. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 189:539–45.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Klimberg V, Rubio I, Henry R, et al. Subareolar versus peritumoral injection for location of the sentinel lymph node. Ann Surg 1999; 229:860–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Kern KA. Concordance and validation study of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer using subareolar injection of blue dye and Technetium 99m sulfur colloid. J Am Coll Surg 2002; 195:467–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rodier JF, Velten M, Wilt M, et al. Prospective multicentric randomized study comparing periareolar and peritumoral injection of radiotracer and blue dye for the detection of sentinel lymph node in breast sparing procedures: FRANSENODE trial. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Povoski SP, Olsen JO, Young DC, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing intradermal, intraparenchymal, and subareolar injection routes for sentinel lymph node mapping and biopsy in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13:1412–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. McMasters KM, Wong SL, Tuttle TM, et al. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy for breast cancer does not improve the ability to identify axillary sentinel lymph nodes. Ann Surg 2000; 231:724–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Borgstein PJ, Pijpers R, Comans EF, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: guidelines and pitfalls of lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe detection. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 186:275–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, et al. A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:546–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Goyal A, Newcombe RG, Chhabra A, et al. Factors affecting failed localisation and false-negative rates of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer—results of the ALMANAC validation phase. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006; 99:203–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Harlow SP, Krag DN, Julian TB, et al. Prerandomization surgical training for the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-32 trial: a randomized phase III clinical trial to compare sentinel node resection to conventional axillary dissection in clinically node-negative breast cancer. Ann Surg 2004; 241:48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Wilke LG, McCall LM, Posther KE, et al. Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy: results from a prospective international cooperative group trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13:491–500.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. McCarter MD, Yeung H, Fey J, et al. The breast cancer patient with multiple sentinel nodes: when to stop? J Am Coll Surg 2001; 192:692–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Duncan M, Cech A, Wechter D, et al. Criterial for establishing the adequacy of a sentinel lymphadenectomy. Am J Surg 2004; 187:639–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Zakaria S, Degnim AC, Kleer CG, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer: how many nodes are enough? J Surg Oncol 2007; 96:554–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Goyal A, Newcombe RG, Mansel RE. Clinical relevance of multiple sentinel nodes in patients with breast cancer. Br J Surg 2005; 92:438–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Tew K, Irwig L, Matthews A, et al. Meta-analysis of sentinel node imprint cytology in breast cancer. Br J Surg 2005; 92:1068–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Association of Directors of Anatomic, Surgical Pathology. Recommendations for processing and reporting of lymph node specimens submitted for evaluation of metastatic disease. Am J Clin Pathol 2001; 115:799–801.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Turner RR. Histopathologic processing of the sentinel lymph node. Semin Breast Dis 2002; 5:35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Weaver DL, Krag DN, Ashikaga T, et al. Pathologic analysis of sentinel and nonsentinel lymph nodes in breast carcinoma: a multicenter study. Cancer 2000; 88:1099–107.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Turner RR, Ollila DW, Stern S, et al. Optimal histopathologic examination of the sentinel lymph node for breast carcinoma staging. Am J Surg Pathol 1999; 23:263–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR, et al. The American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:7703–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Naik AM, Fey J, Gemignani M, et al. The risk of axillary relapse after sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer is comparable with that of axillary lymph node dissection: a follow-up study of 4008 procedures. Ann Surg 2004; 240:462–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Langer I, Marti WR, Guller U, et al. Axillary recurrence rate in breast cancer patients with negative sentinel lymph node (SLN) or SLN micrometastases: prospective analysis of 150 patients after SLN biopsy. Ann Surg 2005; 241:152–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy as a staging procedure in breast cancer: update of a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol 2006; 7:983–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Grube BJ, Giuliano AE. Modification of the sentinel node technique: it was a hit in New York, but will it play in Poughkeepsie? Ann Surg Oncol 2001; 8:3–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Hwang RF, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Yi M, et al. Low locoregional failure rates in selected breast cancer patients with tumor-positive sentinel lymph nodes who do not undergo completion axillary dissection. Cancer 2007; 110:723–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Guenther JM, Hansen NM, DiFronzo LA, et al. Axillary dissection is not required for all patients with breast cancer and positive sentinel nodes. Arch Surg 2003; 138:52–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Fant JS, Grant MD, Knox SM, et al. Preliminary outcome analysis in patients with breast cancer and a positive sentinel lymph node who declined axillary dissection. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10:126–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Cserni G, Amendoeira I, Apostolikas N, et al. Pathological work-up of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Review of current data to be considered for the formulation of guidelines. Eur J Cancer 2003; 39:1654–67.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Cserni G, Gregori D, Merletti F, et al. Meta-analysis of non-sentinel node metastases associated with micrometastatic sentinel nodes in breast cancer. Br J Surg 2004; 91:1245–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. de Mascarel I, Bonichon F, Coindre JM, et al. Prognostic significance of breast cancer axillary lymph node micrometastases assessed by two special techniques: reevaluation with longer follow-up. Br J Cancer 1992; 66:523–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. McGuckin MA, Cummings MC, Walsh MD, et al. Occult axillary node metastases in breast cancer: their detection and prognostic significance. Br J Cancer 1996; 73:88–95.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Cote RJ, Peterson HF, Chaiwun B, et al. Role of immunohistochemical detection of lymph node metastases in management of breast cancer. International Breast Cancer Study Group. Lancet 1999; 354:896–900.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Lucci A, McCall LM, Beitsch PD, et al. Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) plus axillary lymph node dissection compared with SLND alone in the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trial Z0011. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Rutgers EJT, Meijnen P, Bonnefoi H. Clinical trials update of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast Cancer Group. Breast Cancer Res 2004, 6:165–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Glimberti V. International Breast Cancer Study Group trial of sentinel node biopsy. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24:210–1.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, et al. Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 2007; 8:881–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Degnim AC, Kriffith KA, Newman L. Clinicopathologic features of metastasis in non sentinel lymph nodes of breast carcinoma patients: a metaanalysis. Cancer 2003; 98:2307–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Ponzone R, Maggiorotto F, Mariani L, et al. Comparison of two models for the prediction of nonsentinel node metastases in breast cancer. Am J Surg 2007; 193:686–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Van Zee KJ, Manasseh DM, Bevilacqua JL, et al. A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of additional nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10:1140–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Lambert LA, Ayers GD, Hwang RF, et al. Validation of a breast cancer nomogram for predicting nonsentinel lymph node metastases after a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13:310–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Degnim A, Reynolds C, Pantvaidya G, et al. Nonsentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients: assessment of an existing and a new predictive nomogram. Am J Surg 2005; 190:543–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Smidt ML, Kuster DM, van der Wilt GJ, et al. Can the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center nomogram predict the likelihood of sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients in the Netherlands? Ann Surg Oncol 2005; 12:1066–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Kocsis L, Svebis M, Boross G, et al. Use and limitations of a nomogram predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement after a positive sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients. Am Surg 2004; 70:1019–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Gill PG. Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary clearance in operable breast cancer. The RACS SNAC trial, a multicenter randomised trial of the Royal Australian College of Surgeons (RACS) section of breast surgery, in collaboration with the National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Center. Ann Surg Oncol 2004; 11:216S–221S.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Mansel RE, Fallowfield L, Kissin M, et al. Randomized multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: the ALMANAC Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98:599–609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Fleissig A, Fallowfield LJ, Langridge CI, et al. Post-operative arm morbidity and quality of life. Results of the ALMANAC randomised trial comparing sentinel node biopsy with standard axillary treatment in the management of patients with early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006; 95:279–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Purushotham AD, Upponi S, Klevesath MB, et al. Morbidity after sentinel lymph node biopsy in primary breast cancer: results from a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2005; 19:4312–21.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Chung MH, Ye W, Giuliano AE. Role for sentinel lymph node dissection in the management of large (> or = 5 cm) invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2001; 8:688–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Wong SL, Chao C, Edwards MJ, et al. Accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with T2 and T3 breast cancers. Ann Surg 2001; 67:522–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Deurloo EE, Tanis PJ, Gilhuijs KG, et al. Reduction in the number of sentinel lymph node procedures by preoperative ultrasonography of the axilla in breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2003; 39:1068–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Specht MC, Fey JV, Borgen PI, et al. Is the clinically positive axilla in breast cancer really a contraindication to sentinel lymph node biopsy? Am Coll Surg 2005; 200:10–4.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary dissection in breast cancer: results in a large series. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91:368–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Chao C, Wong SL, Woo C, et al. Reliable lymphatic drainage to axillary sentinel lymph nodes regardless of tumor location within the breast. Am J Surg 2001; 182:307–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Schrenk P, Wayand W. Sentinel-node biopsy in axillary lymph-node staging for patients with multicentric breast cancer. Lancet 2001; 357:122.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Tousimis E, Van Zee KJ, Fey JV, et al. The accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in multicentric and multifocal invasive breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 197:529–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Sabel MS, Schott AF, Kleer CG, et al. Sentinel node biopsy prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Am J Surg 2003; 186:102–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Nason KS, Anderson BO, Byrd DR, et al. Increased false negative sentinel node biopsy rates after preoperative chemotherapy for invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer 2000; 89:2187–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Julian TB, Patel N, Dusi D, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Am J Surg 2001; 182:407–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Mamounas EP, Brown A, Anderson S, et al. Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:2694–702.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Xing Y, Foy M, Cox DD, et al. Meta-analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Br J Surg 2006; 93:539–46.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Adamovich T, Simmons R. Ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion. Am J Surg 2003; 186:112–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Yen TW, Hunt KK, Ross MI, et al. Predictors of invasive breast cancer in patients with an initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: a guide to selective use of sentinel lymph node biopsy in management of ductal carcinoma in situ. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 200:516–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. Radiology 2001; 218:497–502.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Goyal A, Douglas-Jones A, Monypenny I, et al. Is there a role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ?: analysis of 587 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006; 98:311–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Mittendorf ME, Arciero CA, Gutchell V, et al. Core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: an indication for sentinel lymph node biopsy. Curr Surg 2005; 62:253–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Meijnen P, Oldenburg HAS, Loo CE, et al. Risk of invasion and axillary lymph node metastasis in ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed by core-needle biopsy. Br J Surg 2007; 94:952–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Lucci A Jr, Kelemen PR, Miller C 3rd, et al. National practice patterns of sentinel lymph node dissection for breast carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2001; 192:453–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Mansfield L, Sosa I, Dionello R, et al. Current management of the axilla in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: a nationwide survey of United Kingdom breast surgeons. Int Semin Surg Oncol 2007; 4:4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Porter GA, McMulkin H, Lovrics PJ. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: Canadian practice patterns. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10:255–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Zavagno G, De Salvo GL, Casara D, et al. Sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer: is it already a standard of care? A survey of current practice in an Italian region. BMC Cancer 2004; 4:2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Hoar FJ, Stonelake PS. A prospective study of the value of axillary node sampling in addition to sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003; 29:526–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Macmillan RD, Barbera D, Hadjiminas DJ, et al. Sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer may have little to offer four-node-samplers. Results of a prospective comparison study. Eur J Cancer 2001; 37:1076–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. Adwani A, Ebbs SR, Burton S, et al. Sentinel node biopsy should be supplemented by axillary sampling in patients with small breast cancers. Int Semin Surg Oncol 2005; 2:27.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. Gui GP, Joubert DJ, Reichert R, et al. Continued axillary sampling is unnecessary and provides no further information to sentinel node biopsy in staging breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005; 31:707–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. Agarwal T, Kakkos SK, Cunningham DA, et al. Sentinel node biopsy can replace four-node sampling in staging early breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005; 31:122–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  128. Ishikawa T, Momiyama N, Hamaguchi Y, et al. Blue-dye technique complements four-nodes sampling for early breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005; 31:1119–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. Benson JR, della Rovere GQ, Axillary Management Consensus Group. Management of the axilla in women with breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 2007; 8:331–48

    Google Scholar 

  130. McWhirter R. The role of simple mastectomy and radiotherapy in the treatment of cancer of the breast. Br J Radiol 1948; 21:599–610.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. Cabanes PA, Salmon RJ, Vilcocq JR, et al. Value of axillary dissection in addition to lumpectomy and radiotherapy in early breast cancer. The Breast Carcinoma Collaborative Group of the Institut Curie. Lancet 1992; 339:1245–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. Louis-Sylvestre C, Clough K, Asselain B, et al. Axillary treatment in conservative management of operable breast cancer: dissection or radiotherapy? Results of a randomized study with 15 years of follow-up. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22:97–101.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Srila Samphao is supported by Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research and Development Department, Lincoln County Hospital, Greetwell Road, Lincoln, LN2 5QY, UK

    Srila Samphao MD, FRCST, Mohamed El-Sheemy MBChB, MSc, PhD & Oleg Eremin MBChB, MD, FRACS, FRCSEd, FRCST (Hon), FMedSci, DSc (Hon)

  2. Department of Clinical Oncology, Lincoln County Hospital, Lincoln, LN2 5QY, UK

    Jennifer M. Eremin MBChB, DMRT, FRCR

  3. Lincoln Breast Unit, Lincoln County Hospital, Lincoln, LN2 5QY, UK

    Mohamed El-Sheemy MBChB, MSc, PhD & Oleg Eremin MBChB, MD, FRACS, FRCSEd, FRCST (Hon), FMedSci, DSc (Hon)

  4. Faculty of Health, Life and Social Sciences Department, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, LN6 7TS, UK

    Mohamed El-Sheemy MBChB, MSc, PhD

  5. Division of Surgery, Queen’s Medical Center, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK

    Oleg Eremin MBChB, MD, FRACS, FRCSEd, FRCST (Hon), FMedSci, DSc (Hon)

Authors
  1. Srila Samphao MD, FRCST
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jennifer M. Eremin MBChB, DMRT, FRCR
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohamed El-Sheemy MBChB, MSc, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Oleg Eremin MBChB, MD, FRACS, FRCSEd, FRCST (Hon), FMedSci, DSc (Hon)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Srila Samphao MD, FRCST.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Samphao, S., Eremin, J., El-Sheemy, M. et al. Management of the Axilla in Women With Breast Cancer: Current Clinical Practice and a New Selective Targeted Approach. Ann Surg Oncol 15, 1282–1296 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-9863-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-9863-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation