Skip to main content
Log in

Trapped solitary waves over an uneven bottom

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal Plus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Steady two-dimensional surface waves on an ideal irrotational fluid over a complex multi-bumped topography are studied analytically in the case when the far upstream flow is slightly supercritical. Fully nonlinear equations are formulated via the von Mises variables that parametrize the bundle of streamlines in the flow over obstacles. For a given small-height topography, we construct approximate two-parametric solution sets which approach the branches of solitary waves as the typical height of the obstacle vanishes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Lamb, Hydrodynamics (Cambridge University Press, New-York, 1924)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. L.K. Forbes, L.W. Schwartz, Free-surface flow over a semicircular obstruction. J. Fluid Mech. 114, 299–314 (1982)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. J.-M. Vanden-Broeck, Free-surface flow over an obstruction in a channel. Phys. Fluids. 30, 2315–2317 (1987)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. L.J. Pratt, On nonlinear flow with multiple obstructions. Geophys. Astrphys. Fluid Dyn. 41, 1214–1225 (1984)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. M.A. Lavrentiev, I. On the theory of long waves. II. A contribution to the theory of long waves. Am. Math. Soc. Transl 102, 3–50 (1954)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. A.M. Ter-Krikorov, The existence of periodic waves which degenerate into a solitary wave. J. Appl. Math. Mech. 24, 930–949 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. K.O. Friedrichs, D.H. Hyers, The existence of solitary waves. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 7, 517–550 (1954)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. J.T. Beale, The existence of solitary water waves. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 30, 373–389 (1977)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. S.M. Sun, M.C. Shen, Exact theory of secondary supercritical solutions for steady surface waves over a bump. Phys. D 67, 301–316 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. F. Dias, J.M. Vanden-Broeck, Trapped waves between submerged obstacles. J. Fluid Mech. 509, 93–102 (2004)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. B.J. Binder, J.M. Vanden-Broeck, F. Dias, Forced solitary waves and fronts past submerged obstacles. Chaos 15, 1–13 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. B.J. Binder, M.G. Blyth, S.W. McCue, Free-surface flow past arbitrary topography and an inverse approach for wave-free solutions. IMA J. Appl. Math. 78, 685–696 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Mielke, Steady flows of inviscid fluids under localized perturbations. J. Differ. Equ. 65(1), 89–116 (1986)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Mielke, Reduction of quasilinear elliptic equations in cylindrical domains with applications. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 10(1), 51–66 (1988)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Balasuriya, B.J. Binder, Nonautonomous analysis of steady Korteweg–de Vries waves under nonlocalised forcing. Phys. D 285, 28–41 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. B.J. Binder, Steady two-dimensional free-surface flow past disturbances in an open channel: solutions of the Korteweg-De Vries equation and analysis of the weakly nonlinear phase space. Fluids 4(1), 1–23 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. V.K. Melnikov, On the stability of the center for time-periodic perturbations. Tr. Mosk. Mat. Obshch. 12, 3–52 (1963)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. H. Poincare, Sur le probleme des trois corps et les equations de la dynamique. Acta Math. 13, 1–270 (1890)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. L.S. Pontryagin, On dynamical systems close to Hamiltonian systems. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 4(9), 883–885 (1934)

    Google Scholar 

  20. I.G. Malkin, The Methods of Lyapunov and Poincare in the Theory of Nonlinear Oscillations (URSS, Moscow, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. P.G. Baines, Topographic Effects in Stratified Flows (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. R. Camassa, T.Y. Wu, Stability of forced steady solitary waves. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 337, 429–466 (1991)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. F. Chardard, F. Dias, H.Y. Nguyen, J.-M. Vanden-Broeck, Stability of some stationary solutions to the forced KdV equation with one or two bumps. J. Eng. Math. 70, 175–189 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. H. Kim, H. Choi, A study of wave trapping between two obstacles in the forced Korteweg de Vries equation. J. Eng. Math. 108, 197–208 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Lee, S. Whang, Trapped supercritical waves for the forced KdV equation with two bumps. Appl. Math. Model. 39, 2649–2660 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. S. Lee, Dynamics of trapped solitary waves for the forced KdV equation. Symmetry 10(5), 129 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. N.I. Makarenko, On the bifurcation of solutions to invariant variational equations. Dokl. Math. 53(3), 369–371 (1996)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. J.D. Wright, A. Scheel, Solitary waves and their linear stability in weakly coupled KdV equations. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 58(4), 535–570 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. J. Gear, R. Grimshaw, Weak and strong interactions between internal solitary waves. Stud. Appl. Math. 70, 235–258 (1984)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. R. Grimshaw, Coupled Korteweg–de Vries equations. Without bounds: A scientific canvas of nonlinearity and complex dynamics, Understanding complex systems, ed. By R.G. Rubio et al. (Springer, Berlin), pp. 317–333 (2013)

  31. A. Vanderbauwhede, Lyapunov–Schmidt method for dynamical systems (Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science (Springer), New York, 2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the RFBR (Grant Nos. 18-01-00648) and Mathematical Center in Akademgorodok under Agreement No. 075-15-2019-1613 with the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. S. Denisenko.

Appendices

Appendix A

Here, we consider the Green’s operator \(\varGamma \) defined by Formula (3.13)

$$\begin{aligned} \varGamma b(x;c_0)= -3\tau _0'(x;c_0)\int \limits _{c_0}^{x}r_0(s;c_0)b(s)\mathrm{d}s -3r_0(x;c_0)\int \limits _{x}^{\infty }\tau _0'(s;c_0)b(s)\mathrm{d}s \end{aligned}$$

where analytic functions \(\tau _0\) and \(r_0\) have exponential behavior at infinity such that

$$\begin{aligned} |\tau _0'(x;c_0)|\leqslant C\,\mathrm{e}^{-|x-c_0|}, \qquad |r_0(x;c_0)|\leqslant C\,\mathrm{e}^{|x-c_0|}. \end{aligned}$$

We suppose that the function b belongs to the class \(C_{\alpha }({\mathbb {R}})\) of continuous functions having an exponential decay \(|b(x)|\leqslant C\exp (-\alpha |x|)\) as \(|x|\rightarrow \infty \) with \(0<\alpha <1\). In this case, the function \(\varGamma b(x;c_0)\) has continuous derivatives \(D_x\varGamma b\) and \(D^2_x\varGamma b\), vanishes exponentially as \(x\rightarrow +\infty \), but can be unbounded since

$$\begin{aligned} \varGamma b(x;c_0)\sim -3\mu (c_0; b)\,r_0(x;c_0)\qquad (x\rightarrow -\infty ) \end{aligned}$$

where \(\mu \) is the Melnikov integral from Formula (3.11). This unbounded term can be removed if the necessary condition (3.11) is valid, so the routine technique provides the estimate

$$\begin{aligned} |\varGamma b(x;c_0)|+|D_x\varGamma b(x;c_0)|+|D^2_x\varGamma b(x;c_0)|\leqslant C\,\mathrm{e}^{-\alpha |x|} \end{aligned}$$

where the constant C does not depend on x. It means that the linear operator \(\varGamma :\,C_{\alpha }({\mathbb {R}})\rightarrow C_{\alpha }^2({\mathbb {R}})\) is bounded under the condition (3.11) for the class \(C^2_{\alpha }({\mathbb {R}})\) which consists of twice continuously differentiable functions having exponential decay rate \(0<\alpha <1\) at infinity.

Appendix B

Here, we prove the lemma formulated in Sect. 3. Let us consider the orthogonality condition prescribed with the function \(\tau _0'\) to the right-hand term from Eq. (3.14):

$$\begin{aligned} \int \limits _{-\infty }^{\infty } \big (\varGamma b(s;c_0)+k_1\tau _0'(s;c_0)\big )^2 \tau _0'(s;c_0)\mathrm{d}s=0. \end{aligned}$$

Note that the term with \(k_1^2\) actually disappears since the eigenfunction \(\tau _0'(s;c_0)\) is odd with respect to the point \(s=c_0\), so the integral with a cubic term \(\tau _0'^3\) vanishes. Therefore, we find immediately that the constant \(k_1\) should be taken as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} k_1=-\,\frac{\displaystyle {\int \limits _{-\infty }^{\infty } \tau _0'(s;c_0)\bigg (\varGamma b(s;c_0)\bigg )^2 \mathrm{d}s}}{\displaystyle {2\int \limits _{-\infty }^{\infty }\tau _0'^2(s;c_0)\,\varGamma b(s;c_0)\, \mathrm{d}s}} \end{aligned}$$
(B.1)

if the denominator is not zero here. Now, we demonstrate that this condition is equivalent to the criterion formulated in the lemma. For that reason, we consider the linear differential operator

$$\begin{aligned} \mathcal{A}(c_0)u:= u_{xx}+\big (9\tau _0(x;c_0)-1\big )u \end{aligned}$$

defined by the left-side part of Eq. (3.9) for the class \(C^2_{\alpha }({\mathbb {R}})\) (see Appendix A). It is clear that the operator \(\mathcal A\) is symmetric with respect to scalar product of the Hilbert space \(L_2({\mathbb {R}})\),

$$\begin{aligned} \int \limits _{-\infty }^{\infty }\mathcal{A}u_1\!(s)\, u_2(s) \mathrm{d}s = \int \limits _{-\infty }^{\infty } u_1\!(s)\, \mathcal{A}u_2(s) \mathrm{d}s, \qquad u_1,u_2\in C^2_{\alpha }({\mathbb {R}}). \end{aligned}$$

Further, we introduce modified Green’s operator \(\mathcal K\) acting by the rule

$$\begin{aligned} \mathcal{K} b(x;c_0):= m_{\delta }\tau _0'(x;c_0)+\varGamma b(x;c_0) \end{aligned}$$
(B.2)

where the constant \(m_{\delta }\) is defined by Formula (3.18) such that the element \(\mathcal{K} b\) occurs to be orthogonal to \(\tau _0'\) automatically in \(L_2({\mathbb {R}})\) for any given function \(b\in C_{\alpha }({\mathbb {R}})\). In other words, the solution \(\tau _1\), taken from (3.12) with the constant \(k_1=m_{\delta }+c_{\delta }\), splits into the orthogonal sum \(\tau _1=c_{\delta }\tau _0'+\mathcal{K}b\) where \(\mu (c_0;\mathcal{K}b)=0\). Note that the operator \(\mathcal A\), defined above, also satisfies the orthogonality condition \(\mu (c_0;\mathcal{A}u)=0\) for any functions \(u\in C^2_{\alpha }({\mathbb {R}})\). With these facts, we obtain from definition of the operator \(\mathcal{K}\) the identity

$$\begin{aligned} \mathcal{A}\mathcal{K} u = \mathcal{K} \mathcal{A} u = u \end{aligned}$$
(B.3)

which holds for any \(u\in C^2_{\alpha }({\mathbb {R}})\) such that \(\mu (c_0;u)=0\). The relation (B.3) means that \(\mathcal{K} \) is the resolvent operator which is inverse to \(\mathcal{A}\) defined on the subspace in \(C^2_{\alpha }({\mathbb {R}})\) being orthogonal to \(\tau _0'\). In that sense, we are following here to standard Lyapunov–Schmidt projection method [31] applied to the Fredholm operator \(\mathcal{A}: C^2_{\alpha }({\mathbb {R}})\rightarrow C_{\alpha }({\mathbb {R}})\) which has one-dimensional kernel appearing due to non-symmetry of the flow. Returning back to Formula (B.1), we can rewrite the denominator to the form announced in the lemma:

$$\begin{aligned} \int \limits _{-\infty }^{\infty }\tau _0'^2(s;c_0)\,\varGamma b (s;c_0)\,\mathrm{d}s= & {} \int \limits _{-\infty }^{\infty }\tau _0'^2(s;c_0)\,\mathcal{K}b (s;c_0)\,\mathrm{d}s\\= & {} \int \limits _{-\infty }^{\infty }\bigg (\mathcal{K}\tau _0'^2(s;c_0)\bigg )b(s)\,\mathrm{d}s= -\frac{1}{9}\int \limits _{-\infty }^{\infty }\tau _0''(s;c_0) b(s)\,\mathrm{d}s\\= & {} \frac{1}{9}\left( \frac{\partial \mu (c;b)}{\partial c}\right) _{\big |c=c_0}. \end{aligned}$$

Indeed, the first step uses here the fact that the elements \(\varGamma b\) and \(\mathcal{K}b \) differ in (B.2) only by the term \(m_{\delta }\tau _0'\) being odd function. Further, we involve the symmetry of resolvent operator \(\mathcal{K}\) transposed to the element \(\tau _0'^2\) via scalar product. Finally, it remains to be noticed that the function \(u=\tau _0''\) is clearly a solution of linear ODE equation \(\mathcal{A}u=-9\tau _0'^2\) where the right-hand term satisfies the solvability condition \(\mu (c_0;\tau _0'^2)=0\).

Concluding remark concerns with transformation of approximate solution \(w=\varepsilon ^2(w_{10}+\delta w_{11})\) to the form (3.17). This property follows immediately from asymptotic decomposition

$$\begin{aligned} \tau _0(x;c_0)+\delta \tau _1(x;c_0)=\tau _0(x;c_0+\delta c_{\delta })+\delta \mathcal{K} b(x;c_0) + h.o.t. \end{aligned}$$

which takes into account the definition (B.2) of the operator \(\mathcal{K}\) and Formula (3.12) with \(k_1=m_{\delta }+c_{\delta }\).

Hence, the lemma is proven.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Denisenko, D.S., Makarenko, N.I. Trapped solitary waves over an uneven bottom. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135, 673 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00673-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00673-5

Navigation