Skip to main content
Log in

Feasibility study on production of 99Mo, 131I, and 133Xe in the different core loading patterns of Tehran Research Reactor using MCNPX 2.6

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal Plus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The production of 99Mo, 131I, and 133Xe radionuclides is very important for consumption in the field of nuclear medicine. Generally, the use of small core reactors is recommended for the production of large-scale these fission radionuclides. In this paper, we have considered three different core loading patterns of Tehran Research Reactor for the economic and optimum production of 99Mo, 131I and 133Xe from low-enriched uranium. These patterns are the large core, the small core with beryllium reflector (SC-Be), and the small core with graphite reflector. Simulation has been performed by MCNPX2.6 to compute the safety calculations, neutron flux changes, and evaluation of mentioned radionuclides production. The results reveal that the SC-Be is more suitable than the others two, in terms of safety. In this core, the drop of thermal neutron flux after loading the mini-plate targets is 11% and the activity of 99Mo, 131I, and 133Xe is 235, 227, and 592 Ci, respectively, at the 8 days after the end of irradiation. So, if the changing pattern of the small core is considered, the SC-Be should be suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S.M. Qaim, S. Sudár, B. Scholten et al., Evaluation of excitation functions of 100Mo (p, dþpn) 99Mo and 100Mo (p,2n) 99 mTc reactions: Estimation of long-lived Tc-impurity and its implication on the specific activity of cyclotron-produced 99 mTc. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 85, 101–113 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2013.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Mushtaq, M. Iqbal, I.H. Bokhari et al., Neutronic and thermal hydraulic analysis for production of fission molybdenum-99 at Pakistan Research Reactor-1. Ann. Nucl. Energy 35(2), 345–352 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2007.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. C. Dong-Keun, K. Myung-Hyun, L. Byung-Chul, Performance Uncertainties of LEU Mo-99 Targets for HANARO (2002)

  4. A. Lokhov, The supply of medical isotopes: review of potential molybdenum 99/technetium-99m production technologies. Viena, Áustria:© OECD. Nuclear Development (2010)

  5. E. Abedi, M. Ebrahimkhani, A. Davari et al., Neutronic and thermal-hydraulic analysis of fission molybdenum-99 production at Tehran Research Reactor using LEU plate targets. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 118, 160–166 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2016.09.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. N.M. Isotope’s(NWMI), Construction permit application for radioisotope production facility (2015)

  7. E. Bradley, Non-HEU Production technologies for molybdenum-99 and technetium-99m (2013)

  8. A. Lashkari, H. Khalafi, S.M. Mirvakili et al., Neutronic analysis for Tehran Research Reactor mixed-core. Prog. Nucl. Energy 60, 31–37 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2012.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. K. Farhadi, S. Khakshournia, feasibility study for Tehran research reactor power upgrading. Ann. Nucl. Energy 35(7), 1177–1184 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2007.12.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Gharib, Power upgrading of the Tehran research reactor. In: 10th International Topical Meeting Research Reactor Fuel Management. pp. 325–329 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2007.12.014

  11. AEOI (Atomic Energy Organization of Iran), Final Safety Analysis Report of Tehran Research Reactor (TRR) (2009)

  12. B.P. Denise, MCNPX user’s manual version 2.6.0. LA-CP-07-1473. Los Alamos National Laboratory (2008)

  13. J. Medel, G. Torres, Neutronic analysis for the fission Mo-99 production by irradiation of a LEU target at RECH-1 reactor (2007)

  14. A.T. Silva, D.B. Domingos, T.G. Joao, et al., Neutronic and thermal-hydraulics calculations for the production of molybdenum-99 by fission in low enriched uranium UAlx-Al targets. RRFM. pp 19–23 (2015)

  15. A. Mushtaq, M. Iqbal, I.H. Bokhari et al., Low enriched uranium foil plate target for the production of fission Molybdenum-99 in Pakistan Research Reactor-1. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 267(7), 1109–1114 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2009.01.138

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Mohammad, T. Mahmood, M. Iqbal, Fission MOLY production at PARR-1 using LEU plate type target. Nucl. Eng. Des. 239(3), 521–525 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J.Parma, Safety analysis for operating the Annular Core Research Reactor with Cintichem-type targets installed in the central region of the core. Sandia National Labs (2000)

  18. R.M. Refeat, H.K. Louis, The effect of Mo production on the neutronic safety parameters of research reactors. Arab. J. Nucl. Sci. Appl. 47(1), 145–153 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Jo, K.-H. Lee, H.-C. Kim et al., Neutronic and thermal hydraulic analyses of LEU targets irradiated in a research reactor for Molybdenum-99 production. Ann. Nucl. Energy (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.04.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamad Amin Amirkhani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Safari, S.A., Tabasi, M., Ebrahimkhani, M. et al. Feasibility study on production of 99Mo, 131I, and 133Xe in the different core loading patterns of Tehran Research Reactor using MCNPX 2.6. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135, 441 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00474-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00474-w

Navigation