Skip to main content
Log in

BRST analysis of topologically massive gauge theory: novel observations

  • Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal C Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A dynamical non-Abelian 2-form gauge theory (with BF term) is endowed with the “scalar” and “vector” gauge symmetry transformations. In our present endeavor, we exploit the latter gauge symmetry transformations and perform the Becchi–Rouet–Stora–Tyutin (BRST) analysis of the four (3+1)-dimensional (4D) topologically massive non-Abelian 2-form gauge theory. We demonstrate the existence of some novel features that have, hitherto, not been observed in the context of BRST approach to 4D (non-)Abelian 1-form as well as Abelian 2-form and 3-form gauge theories. We comment on the differences between the novel features that emerge in the BRST analysis of the “scalar” and “vector” gauge symmetries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T.J. Allen, M.J. Bowick, A. Lahiri, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6, 559 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. D.Z. Freedman, P.K. Townsend, Nucl. Phys. B 177, 282 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Lahiri, Phys. Rev. D 55, 5045 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Lahiri, Phys. Rev. D 63, 105002 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. E. Harikumar, A. Lahiri, M. Sivakumar, Phys. Rev. D 63, 105020 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. R.P. Malik, Eur. Phys. J. C 60, 457 (2009). hep-th/0702039

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Gupta, R. Kumar, R.P. Malik, Eur. Phys. J. C 70, 491 (2010). arXiv:1003.3390 [hep-th]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. L. Bonora, P. Pasti, M. Tonin, Nuovo Cimento A 63, 353 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. L. Bonora, M. Tonin, Phys. Lett. B 98, 48 (1981)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Krishna, A. Shukla, R.P. Malik, arXiv:1008.2649 [hep-th]

  11. R. Kumar, R.P. Malik, Europhys. Lett. 94, 11001 (2011). arXiv:1012.5195 [hep-th]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. K. Nishijima, Czech. J. Phys. 46, 1 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields: Modern Applications, vol. 2 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. L. Bonora, R.P. Malik, J. Phys. A, Math. Theor. 43, 375403 (2010). arXiv:0911.4919 [hep-th]

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. R.P. Malik, arXiv:1106.3764 [hep-th]

  16. H. Ruegg, M.R. Altaba, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19, 3265 (2004). arXiv:hep-th/0304245

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. W.E. Burcham, M. Jobes, Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 2 (Wiley, New York, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, R., Malik, R.P. BRST analysis of topologically massive gauge theory: novel observations. Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1710 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1710-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1710-6

Keywords

Navigation