Skip to main content
Log in

Confronting models of cosmic ray interactions with particle physics at LHC energies

  • Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal C Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inelastic pp collisions are dominated by soft (low momentum transfer) physics, to which perturbative QCD cannot be fully applied. A deep understanding of both soft and semi-hard processes is crucial for predictions of minimum bias and underlying events of the pp large hadron collider (LHC) now coming on line. Moreover, the interaction of cosmic ray particles entering in the atmosphere is extremely sensitive to these soft processes and consequently cannot be formulated from first principles. Because of this, air shower analyses strongly rely on hadronic interaction models, which extrapolate collider data by several orders of magnitude. A comparative study of Monte Carlo simulations of pp collisions (at the LHC center-of-mass energy ≃14 TeV) using the most popular hadronic interaction models for ultrahigh energy cosmic ray (SIBYLL and QGSJET) and for collider physics (the PYTHIA multiparton model) is presented. The most relevant distributions are studied including the observables from diffractive events with the aim of discriminating between the different models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Sommers, Comments Nucl. Part. Phys. A 2, 261 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.W. Cronin et al., FERMILAB-PROPOSAL-0881, Jul 1995, p. 18

  3. Auger Collaboration, M. Kleifges, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 518, 180 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. L.A. Anchordoqui, M.T. Dova, L.N. Epele, S.J. Sciutto, Phys. Rev. D 59, 094003 (1999) [hep-ph/9810384]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. L. Anchordoqui, M.T. Dova, A. Mariazzi, T. McCauley, T. Paul, S. Reucroft, J. Swain, Ann. Phys. 314, 145 (2004) [hep-ph/0407020]

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Knapp, D. Heck, S.J. Sciutto, M.T. Dova, M. Risse, Astropart. Phys. 19, 77 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Nagano, D. Heck, K. Shinozaki, N. Inoue, J. Knapp, Astropart. Phys. 13, 277 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. S.C. Corbato et al., Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. B 28, 36 (1992)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. LHC Study Group 1995 The large hadron collider conceptual design, CERN/AC/95-05

  10. ATLAS Collaboration, Detector and Physics Performance TDR, CERN-LHCC/99-14, 1999

  11. CMS Collaboration, Technical Design Report, CERN-LHCC 2006-21

  12. G. Matthiae, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. A 99, 281 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. TOTEM Collaboration, TOTEM: Technical Design Report, CERN-LHCC-1997-049, CERN-LHCC-1999-007, CERN-LHCC-2004-002, CERN-LHCC-2004-020

  14. M. Rijssenbeek, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 122, 459 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. O. Adriani et al., CERN-LHCC-2006-004

  16. M. Albrow et al., CERN-LHCC-2005-025

  17. E. Pedrazzi, Lectures given at 6th Workshop on Hadron Physics, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil, 16–21 March, 1998 [hep-ph/9809454]

  18. A. de Roeck, Acta Phys. Pol. B 33, 3591 (2002)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. CDF Collaboration, M. Gallinaro, hep-ph/0410232

  20. S.M. Troshin, N.E. Tyurin, prepared for 15th International Workshop on High-Energy Physics and Quantum Field Theory (QFTHEP 2000), Tver, Russia, 14–20 September 2000

  21. L. Frankfurt, M. Strikman, C. Weiss, M. Zhalov, Czech. J. Phys. B 55, 675 (2005) [hep-ph/0412260]

    Google Scholar 

  22. V.A. Khoze, A.D. Martin, M.G. Ryskin, Eur. Phys. J. C 23, 311 (2002) [hep-ph/0111078]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. S. Tapprogge, prepared for 26th Johns Hopkins Workshop on High-Energy Reactions, from the Standard Model to String Theory, from Colliders to Cosmic Rays, Heidelberg, Germany, 1–3 August 2002

  24. R.S. Fletcher, T.K. Gaisser, P. Lipari, T. Stanev, Phys. Rev. D 50, 5710 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. N.N. Kalmykov, S.S. Ostapchenko, A.I. Pavlov, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. B 52, 17 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. T. Sjöstrand, P. Edén, C. Friberg, L. Lönnblad, G. Miu, S. Mrenna, E. Norrbin, Comput. Phys. Commun. 135, 238 (2001)

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. R. Engel, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 151, 437 (2006) [astro-ph/0504358]

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. A. Kupčo, ATL-PHYS-99-019 (1999)

  29. A. Moraes, I. Dawson, C. Buttar, ATL-PHYS-2003-020 (2003)

  30. I. Dawson, C. Buttar, A. Moraes, Czech. J. Phys. 53, A1 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. C.M. Buttar, D. Clements, I. Dawson, A. Moraes, Acta Phys. Pol. 35, 433 (2004)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. J.P. Guillaud, A. Sobol, LAPP-EXP 2004-06

  33. A. Moraes, C. Buttar, I. Dawson, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2005-007

  34. S.S. Ostapchenko, J. Phys. G 29, 831 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. J. Ranft, hep-ph/9911232

  36. S. Ostapchenko, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 151, 143 (2006) [hep-ph/0501093]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. CDF Collaboration, R. Abe et al., Phys. Rev. D 41, 2330 (1990)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. T. Sjöstrand, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 3, 751 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. D. Heck, Proc. of 27th Int. Cosmic Ray Conf. 1, p. 233, Hamburg, Germany, 2001

  40. R.T. Engel, T.K. Gaisser, P. Lipari, Stanev, Proc. of 26th ICRC (Salt Lake City) 1, p. 415, 1999

  41. L. Frankfurt, W. Koepf, M. Strikman, Phys. Lett. B 405, 367 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. R. Luna, A. Zepeda, C.A. García Canal, S.J. Sciutto, Phys. Rev. D 70, 1140 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M.T. Dova.

Additional information

PACS

13.85.-t; 96.40.-z

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dova, M., Ferrari, S. Confronting models of cosmic ray interactions with particle physics at LHC energies. Eur. Phys. J. C 52, 673–681 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0412-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0412-6

Keywords

Navigation