Skip to main content
Log in

Investment/taxation/redistribution model criticality

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An agent model with annual wealth investment and taxation presents a critical phase transition when one crosses the frontier regressive/progressive taxation. For the regressive case the final destiny of the society is a collapsed configuration in which all population wealth eventually remains in hands of a single agent, an absorbing state spontaneously breaking the symmetry among agents. For progressive taxation, the dynamic process continues forever with fluctuating wealths distributed among all agents; symmetry is not broken. The order parameter is the average m = −⟨logw1⟩, where w1 is the wealth share of the richest agent, vanishing at the collapsed phase. A parameter p controls the taxation progressiveness (p > 0) or regressiveness (p < 0) and plays the same role of the temperature in traditional, equilibrium phase transitions, p = pc = 0 being the critical transition point. Also, a given fraction of the total taxes paid by the population is uniformly redistributed among all agents, this procedure playing the same role of a uniform external field h in equilibrium phase transitions. Here, the transition criticality of the order parameter m as a function of p and h is studied in detail.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P.M.C. de Oliveira, Europhys. Lett. 119, 40007 (2017) and references therein

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Levy, J. Econ. Theory 110, 42 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J.-P. Bouchaud, M. Mézard, Physica A 282, 536 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. P.M.C. de Oliveira, Physica A 537, 122588 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. C.N. Yang, Phys. Rev. 85, 808 (1952)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. D.B. Abraham, Phys. Lett. A 43, 163 (1973)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. J.R.L. de Almeida, D.J. Thouless, J. Phys. A 11, 983 (1978)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. J.R.L. de Almeida, R.C. Jones, J.M. Kosterlitz, D.J. Thouless, J. Phys. C 11, L871 (1978)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Sherrington, S. Kirkpatrick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1972 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Kirkpatrick, D. Sherrington, Phys. Rev. B 17, 4384 (1978)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Mézard, G. Parisi, M. Virasoro,Spin Glass Theory and Beyond (World Scientific, Singapore 1987)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulo Murilo Castro de Oliveira.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

The EPJ Publishers remain neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Oliveira, P.M.C. Investment/taxation/redistribution model criticality. Eur. Phys. J. B 93, 196 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2020-10308-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2020-10308-x

Keywords

Navigation