Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling opinion interactions in a BBS community

  • Published:
The European Physical Journal B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is devoted to apply agent based models to real opinion interactions in a bulletin board system (BBS) community. By analyzing a real BBS community, we reveal some empirical features of opinion interactions on the Web. Then, we propose a simple opinion model that bears both general characteristics of traditional opinion models, and some real interacting rules on the Web. The model simulates a group of agents representing Web users participating to a discussion. Simulation results show some dynamical regimes consistent with empirical facts, and offer some possible explanations for the emergence of some real features. Our work implies the possibility of building simple agent based models to simulate computer-mediated interactions on the Web.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Weisbuch, Social Opinion Dynamics, in Econophysics and Sociophysics: Trends and Perspectives, edited by B.K. Chakrabarti, A. Chakraborti, A. Chatterjee (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2006)

  2. C. Castellanc, S. Fortunatc, V. Loreto, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 591 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Moss, B. Edmonds, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 8, 13 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Sobkowicz, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 12, 11 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Sobkowicz, A. Sobkowicz, Eur. Phys. J. B 73, 633 (2010)

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Deffuant, D. Neau, F. Amblard, G. Weisbuch, Advs. Compl. Syst. 3, 87 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. G. Weisbuch, G. Deffuant, F. Amblard, J.P. NadalMeet, Complexity 7, 55 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Deffuant, Final report of project FAIR 3 CT 2092. Improving Agri-environmental Policies: A Simulation Approach to the Cognitive Properties of Farmers and Institutions, 2001, pp. 56–69 http://wwwlisc.clermont.cemagref.fr/ImagesProject/freport.pdf

  9. E. Aronson, T.D. Wilson, R.M. Akert, Social Psychology. The heart and the Mind (HarperCollins College Publisher, 1994)

  10. R. Cialdini, Influence Science and Practice, 4th edn. (Allyn & Bacon, 2000)

  11. K. Sznajd-Weron, S. Jozef, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 11, 1157 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. K. Sznajd-Weron, ACTA Physica Polonica B 36, 2537 (2005)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. A.T. Bernardes, U.M.S. Costa, A.D. Araujo, D. Stauffer, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 12, 159 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A.T. Bernardes, D. Stauffer, J. Kertesz, Eur. Phys. J. B 25, 123 (2002)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. M.C. Gonzalez, A.O. Sousa, H.J. Herrmann, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 15, 45 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Galam, Eur. Phys. J. B 25, 403 (2002)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Galam, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 19, 409 (2008)

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Galam, Physica A 333, 453 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Galam, Qual. Quant. J. 41, 579 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D. Stauffer, AIP Conference Proceedings 779, 56 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. A.C.R. Martins, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 19, 617 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. A.C.R. Martins, e-print arXiv:0811.0113 (2008)

  23. A.D. Mare, V. Latora, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 18, 1377 (2007)

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. F. Ding, Y. Liu, Y. Li, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 20, 479 (2009)

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. F. Ding, Y. Liu, B. Shen, X.M. Si, Physica A 389, 1745 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. D. Gruhl, R. Guha, D. Liben-Nowell, A. Tomkins, SIGKDD Explorations 6, 43 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Leskovec, L.A. Adamic, B.A. Huberman, in EC '06: Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Electronic commerce (2006), pp. 228–237

  28. J. Leskovec, M. McGlohon, C. Faloutsos, N. Glance, M. Hurst, SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM) (2007)

  29. M. Cha, A. Mislove, B. Adams, K.P. Gummadi, in WOSP '08: Proceedings of the first workshop on Online social networks (ACM, New York, USA, 2008), pp. 13–18

  30. M. Cha, A. Mislove, K.P. Gummadi, in WWW '09: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web (ACM, New York, USA, 2009), pp. 721–730

  31. F. Wu, B.A. Huberman, Public discourse in the web does not exhibit group polarization (2008), URL http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/opinion_expression

  32. J. Lorenz, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 18, 1819 (2007)

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. J. Voss, Measuring wikipedia, in Proc. of ISSI (2005)

  34. R. Albert, A.L. Barabasi, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 47 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. T.S. Evans, Contemporary Physics 45, 455 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. D.G. Myers, Social Psychology, 9th edn. (McGraw-Hill, 2007)

  37. A.L. Barabasi, Nature 435, 207 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. A. Vazquez, J.G. Oliveira, Z. Dezso, K. Goh, I. Kondor, A.L. Barabasi, Phys. Rev. E 73, 036127 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Ding.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ding, F., Liu, Y. Modeling opinion interactions in a BBS community. Eur. Phys. J. B 78, 245–252 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2010-10453-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2010-10453-9

Keywords

Navigation