Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of color reconnection and hadronic re-scattering on underlying events in p–p collisions at LHC energies

  • Regular Article - Experimental Physics
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Underlying events dominate most of the hadronic activity in p–p collisions and are spanned from perturbative to non-perturbative quantum chromodynamics (QCD), with sensitivity ranging from multi-scale to very low-x-scale physics. A detailed understanding of such events plays a crucial role in the accurate understanding of Standard Model (SM) and beyond Standard Model physics. The underlying event activity has been studied within the framework of the Pythia 8 Monte Carlo model, considering the underlying event observables mean charged particle multiplicity density (\(\langle d^{2}N /d\eta d\phi \rangle \)) and mean scalar \(p_T\) sum (\(\langle d^{2} \sum p_{T} /d\eta d\phi \rangle \)) as a function of the leading charged particle in the towards, away, and transverse regions of p–p collisions at \(\sqrt{s}\) = 2.76, 7, and 13 TeV. The towards, away, and transverse regions have been defined on an azimuthal plane relative to the leading particle in p–p collisions. The energy dependence of underlying events and their activity in the central and forward regions have also been studied. The effect of hadronic re-scattering, color reconnection, and rope hadronization mechanism implemented in Pythia 8 has been studied in detail to gain insight into the different processes contributing to underlying events in the soft sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability Statement

This manuscript has associated data in a data repository. [Authors’ comment: The plots shown are results of the simulation carried out at private cluster. The published data points are taken from Reference [13].]

References

  1. G. Aad et al., ATLAS Collaboration. Phys. Rev. D 83, 112001 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rick Field, Annu. Rev. Nuclear and Particle Science 62, 453–483 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. V. Khachatrayan et al., CMS collaboration. Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 155 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. B. Abelev et al., ALICE Collaboration. JHEP 2012, 116 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Chatrchyan et al., CMS Collaboration. JHEP 2013, 72 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Torbjörn Sjöstrand, Stefan Ask, Jesper R Christiansen, Richard Corke, Nishita Desai, Philip Ilten, Stephen Mrenna, Stefan Prestel, Christine O Rasmussen, and Peter Z Skands. Comput. phys. commun. 191, 159–177 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Brun, F. Rademakers, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 389, 81–86 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Torbjörn Sjöstrand, Marius Utheim, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 907 (2020)

  9. J.R. Christiansen, P.Z. Skands, JHEP1508(2015)

  10. C. Bierlich, J.R. Christiansen, Phys. Rev. D 92, 094010 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. T.S. Biro, H.B. Nielson, J. Knoll, Nucl. Phys. B 245, 449 (1984)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. C. Bierlich, G. Gustafson, L. Lonnblad, A. Tarasov, JHEP 2015, 148 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Aaboud et al., ATLAS Collaboration. JHEP 03, 157 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. T. Aaltonen et al., CDF Collaboration. Phys. Rev. D 92, 092009 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ortiz. Antonio, Palomo. Lizardo Valencia,Phys. Rev. D 96, 114019 (2017)

  16. Ortiz. Antonio, Palomo. Lizardo Valencia, Phys. Rev. D 99, 034027 (2019)

  17. J. Bellm, Eur. Phys. J C 76(4), 196 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. C.B. Duncan, P. Kirchgaeer, Eur. Phys. J C 79, 61 (2019)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. E. Bothmann et al., SciPost Phys. 7, 034 (2019)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Department of Science and Technology (DST), India, for supporting the present work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sadhana Dash.

Additional information

Communicated by Xin-Nian Wang.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, K., Dash, S. Effect of color reconnection and hadronic re-scattering on underlying events in p–p collisions at LHC energies. Eur. Phys. J. A 58, 148 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00795-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00795-7

Navigation