Abstract
A stacked-target of natural lanthanum foils (99.9119% 139La) was irradiated using a 60 MeV proton beam at the LBNL 88-Inch Cyclotron. 139La(p,x) cross sections are reported between 35–60 MeV for nine product radionuclides. The primary motivation for this measurement was the need to quantify the production of 134Ce. As a positron-emitting analogue of the promising medical radionuclide 225Ac, 134Ce is desirable for in vivo applications of bio-distribution assays for this emerging radio-pharmaceutical. The results of this measurement were compared to the nuclear model codes TALYS, EMPIRE and ALICE (using default parameters), which showed significant deviation from the measured values.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: The gamma-ray spectra and all other raw data created during this research are openly available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3599779. Upon publication, the experimentally determined cross sections will be uploaded to the EXFOR database.]
References
F. Tárkányi, F. Ditrói, S. Takács, A. Hermanne, M. Baba, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 115, 262 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2016.07.003
L. Bernstein, D. Brown, A. Hurst, J. Kelly, F. Kondev, E. Mccutchan, C. Nesaraja, R. Slaybaugh, A. Sonzogni (2015)
N. Otuka, E. Dupont, V. Semkova, B. Pritychenko, A. Blokhin, M. Aikawa, S. Babykina, M. Bossant, G. Chen, S. Dunaeva et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 120, 272 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2014.07.065
W. Hauser, H. Feshbach, Phys. Rev. 87, 366 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.87.366
R.A. Boll, D. Malkemus, S. Mirzadeh, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 62, 667 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2004.12.003
A. Jain, R. Raut, J. Tuli, Nucl. Data Sheets 110, 1409 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2009.04.003
A.K. Jain, S. Singh, S. Kumar, J.K. Tuli, Nucl. Data Sheets 108, 883 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2007.03.002
F. Kondev, E. McCutchan, B. Singh, K. Banerjee, S. Bhattacharya, A. Chakraborty, S. Garg, N. Jovancevic, S. Kumar, S. Rathi et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 147, 382 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2018.01.002
M. Basunia, Nucl. Data Sheets 108, 633 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2007.02.002
J. Chen, F. Kondev, Nucl. Data Sheets 126, 373 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2015.05.003
D.A. Mulford, D.A. Scheinberg, J.G. Jurcic, J. Nucl. Med. 46, 199S (2005)
C. Apostolidis, R. Molinet, G. Rasmussen, A. Morgenstern, Anal. Chem. 77, 6288 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1021/ac0580114
A. Sonzogni, Nucl. Data Sheets 103, 1 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2004.11.001
A.J. Koning, D. Rochman, Nucl. Data Sheets 113, 2841 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2012.11.002
M. Herman, R. Capote, B. Carlson, P. Obložinský, M. Sin, A. Trkov, H. Wienke, V. Zerkin, Nucl. Data Sheets 108, 2655 (2007) (special Issue on Evaluations of Neutron Cross Sections) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2007.11.003
S.A. Graves, P.A. Ellison, T.E. Barnhart, H.F. Valdovinos, E.R. Birnbaum, F.M. Nortier, R.J. Nickles, J.W. Engle, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 386, 44 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2016.09.018
A.S. Voyles, L.A. Bernstein, E.R. Birnbaum, J.W. Engle, S.A. Graves, T. Kawano, A.M. Lewis, F.M. Nortier, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 429, 53 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2018.05.028
IAEA, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria (2001)
J.F. Ziegler, M. Ziegler, J. Biersack, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B: Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 268, 1818 (2010) (19th International Conference on Ion Beam Analysis) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2010.02.091
M.J. Berger, J.H. Hubbell, S.M. Seltzer, J. Chang, J.S. Coursey, R. Sukumar, D.S. Zucker, K. Olsen (2010)
M.K. Covo, R. Albright, B. Ninemire, M. Johnson, A. Hodgkinson, T. Loew, J. Benitez, D. Todd, D. Xie, T. Perry et al., Measurement 127, 580 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.10.018
B. Singh, A.A. Rodionov, Y.L. Khazov, Nucl. Data Sheets 109, 517 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2008.02.001
J.T. Morrell, NPAT: Nuclear physics analysis tools (2019) (Online) https://jtmorrell.github.io/npat/build/html/index.html. Accessed 25 June 2019
M.R. Bhat, Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File (ENSDF). In Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, edited by S.M. Qaim (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992), pp. 817–821, ISBN 978-3-642-58113-7
G. Knoll, Radiation detection and measurement (Wiley, Hoboken, 1999)
H. Bateman, Proc. Campridge Philos. Soc. 15, 423 (1910). https://doi.org/10.12691/ijp-4-2-3
A. Hermanne, A.V. Ignatyuk, R. Capote, B.V. Carlson, J.W. Engle, M.A. Kellett, T. Kibédi, G. Kim, F.G. Kondev, M. Hussain et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 148, 338 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2018.02.009
J.T. Goorley, M.R. James et al., Los Alamos Rep. LA-UR-13-22934 180, 298 (2013). https://doi.org/10.13182/NT11-135
M. Blann, J. Bisplinghoff (1982)
F. Tárkányi, A. Hermanne, F. Ditrói, S. Takács, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 312, 691 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-017-5253-7
R. Alt, G. Beyer, V. Morozov, H. Musiol, T. Numinov, H. Tyrroff, H. Strusny, Z. Usmanova, V. Fominykh, H. Fuya et al., Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Fiz. 36, 744 (1972)
R. Ma, E.S. Paul, D.B. Fossan, Y. Liang, N. Xu, R. Wadsworth, I. Jenkins, P.J. Nolan, Phys. Rev. C 41, 2624 (1990)
H.C. Jain, S. Lakshmi, P.K. Joshi, Identification Of Chiral Bands In \(^{135}\)Ce (In Proc, Nuclei at the Limits, 2005)
D. Brink, Nucl. Phys. 4, 215 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(87)90021-6
A.J. Koning, J.P. Delaroche, Nucl. Phys. A 713, 231 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(02)01321-0
Y. Khazov, A. Rodionov, F. Kondev, Nucl. Data Sheets 112, 855 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2011.03.001
A. Grütter, Nucl. Phys. A 383, 98 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(82)90078-1
V. Aleksandrov, M. Semyonova, V. Semyonov, Atom. Energ. 62, 411 (1987)
S. Mills, G. Steyn, F. Nortier, Int. J. Radiat. Appl. Instrum. Part A. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 43, 1019 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-2889(92)90221-Y
R. Michel, R. Bodemann, H. Busemann, R. Daunke, M. Gloris, H.J. Lange, B. Klug, A. Krins, I. Leya, M. Lp̈ke et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 129, 153 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(97)00213-9
M. Shahid, K. Kim, H. Naik, M. Zaman, S.C. Yang, G. Kim, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 342, 305 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2014.10.019
E. Garrido, C. Duchemin, A. Guertin, F. Haddad, N. Michel, V. Métivier, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 383, 191 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2016.07.011
E. Browne, J. Tuli, Nucl. Data Sheets 108, 2173 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2007.09.002
P.K. Joshi, B. Singh, S. Singh, A.K. Jain, Nucl. Data Sheets 138, 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2016.11.001
Y. Khazov, A. Rodionov, S. Sakharov, B. Singh, Nucl. Data Sheets 104, 497 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2005.03.001
K. Zuber, B. Singh, Nucl. Data Sheets 125, 1 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2015.02.001
A.L. Nichols, B. Singh, J.K. Tuli, Nucl. Data Sheets 113, 973 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2012.04.002
B. Erjun, H. Junde, Nucl. Data Sheets 92, 147 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1006/ndsh.2001.0002
C.D. Nesaraja, S.D. Geraedts, B. Singh, Nucl. Data Sheets 111, 897 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2010.03.003
M.S. Basunia, Nucl. Data Sheets 127, 69 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2015.07.002
R. Firestone, Nucl. Data Sheets 108, 2319 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2007.10.001
M.S. Basunia, J.T. Morrell, M.S. Uddin, A.S. Voyles et al. (2019) (to be published)
Acknowledgements
We wish to acknowledge our thanks to the operators of the 88-Inch Cyclotron, Brien Ninemire, Nick Brickner, Tom Gimpel and Scott Small, for their efforts in setting a new “high-water mark” for the maximum proton energy extracted from the machine as well as for their assistance and support. We would also like to thank the members of the LBNL Nuclear Data group and the Nuclear Engineering department at UC Berkeley, who contributed their time and knowledge towards the review of this experiment. This work has been performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract No. LAB16-1588 NSD. This research is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy Isotope Program, managed by the Office of Science for Nuclear Physics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by R. V. F. Janssens
Appendices
Relevant nuclear data [13, 22, 36, 43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]
Isotope | \(\gamma \) Energy (keV) | \(I_{\gamma }\) (%) | \(T_{1/2}\) |
---|---|---|---|
134Ce | – | – | 3.16 (4) d |
134La | 604.721 (2) | 5.04 (20) | 6.45 (16) m |
135Ce | 265.56 (2) | 41.8 (14) | 17.7 (3) h |
137mCe | 254.29 (5) | 11.1 (4) | 34.4 (3) h |
137gCe | 447.15 (8) | 1.22 (3) | 9.0 (3) h |
139gCe | 165.8575 (11) | 79.95 (6) | 137.64 (2) d |
135La | 480.51 (2) | 1.52 (24) | 19.5 (2) h |
133mBa | 275.925 (7) | 17.69 (25) | 38.93 (1) h |
133gBa | 356.0129 (7) | 62.05 (19) | 10.551 (11) y |
132Cs | 667.714 (2) | 97.59 (9) | 6.480 (6) d |
61Cu | 282.956 (10) | 12.2 (22) | 3.339 (8) h |
62Zn | 596.56 (13) | 26.0 (20) | 9.193 (15) h |
63Zn | 669.62 (5) | 8.2 (3) | 38.47 (5) m |
58Co | 810.7593 (20) | 99.45 (1) | 70.86 (6) d |
22Na | 1274.537 (7) | 99.940 (14) | 2.6018 (22) y |
24Na | 1368.626 (5) | 99.9936 (15) | 14.997 (12) h |
Stack design
Foil Id | Compound | \(\varDelta x\) (mm) | \(\rho \varDelta x\) (mg/\(\hbox {cm}^2\)) |
---|---|---|---|
SS3 | 316 SS | 0.13 | \(100.48 \pm 0.46\) |
La01 | La | 0.0275 | \(14.59 \pm 0.69\) |
Al01 | Al | 0.027 | \(6.58 \pm 0.02\) |
Cu01 | Cu | 0.029 | \(22.13 \pm 0.07\) |
E1 | Al | 0.254 | \(68.53 \pm 5.08\) |
La02 | La | 0.0278 | \(15.55 \pm 0.71\) |
Al02 | Al | 0.0278 | \(6.67 \pm 0.12\) |
Cu02 | Cu | 0.0293 | \(22.23 \pm 0.44\) |
E2 | Al | 0.254 | \(68.53 \pm 5.08\) |
La03 | La | 0.0315 | \(15.12 \pm 0.83\) |
Al03 | Al | 0.027 | \(6.7 \pm 0.03\) |
Cu03 | Cu | 0.031 | \(22.24 \pm 0.07\) |
E3 | Al | 0.254 | \(68.53 \pm 5.08\) |
La04 | La | 0.0288 | \(14.95 \pm 0.66\) |
Al04 | Al | 0.027 | \(6.68 \pm 0.03\) |
Cu04 | Cu | 0.0317 | \(22.49 \pm 0.42\) |
E4 | Al | 0.254 | \(68.53 \pm 5.08\) |
La05 | La | 0.027 | \(15.07 \pm 0.65\) |
Al05 | Al | 0.027 | \(6.64 \pm 0.01\) |
Cu05 | Cu | 0.0313 | \(22.39 \pm 0.42\) |
E5 | Al | 0.254 | \(68.53 \pm 5.08\) |
La06 | La | 0.026 | \(14.32 \pm 0.78\) |
Al06 | Al | 0.0278 | \(6.66 \pm 0.23\) |
Cu06 | Cu | 0.031 | \(22.22 \pm 0.05\) |
E6+E7 | Al | 0.508 | \(137.06 \pm 10.16\) |
La07 | La | 0.0258 | \(14.21 \pm 0.29\) |
Al07 | Al | 0.0273 | \(6.64 \pm 0.12\) |
Cu07 | Cu | 0.031 | \(22.4 \pm 0.05\) |
E8+E9 | Al | 0.508 | \(137.06 \pm 10.16\) |
La08 | La | 0.0283 | \(15.64 \pm 0.28\) |
Al08 | Al | 0.0273 | \(6.72 \pm 0.13\) |
Cu08 | Cu | 0.032 | \(22.16 \pm 1.2\) |
E10+E11 | Al | 0.508 | \(137.06 \pm 10.16\) |
La09 | La | 0.0268 | \(12.67 \pm 0.51\) |
Al09 | Al | 0.0275 | \(6.65 \pm 0.14\) |
Cu09 | Cu | 0.031 | \(22.2 \pm 0.72\) |
E12+E13 | Al | 0.508 | \(137.06 \pm 10.16\) |
La10 | La | 0.0278 | \(16.14 \pm 0.3\) |
Al10 | Al | 0.027 | \(6.73 \pm 0.02\) |
Cu10 | Cu | 0.031 | \(22.5 \pm 0.05\) |
SS4 | 316 SS | 0.13 | \(101.26 \pm 0.79\) |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morrell, J.T., Voyles, A.S., Basunia, M.S. et al. Measurement of 139La(p,x) cross sections from 35–60 MeV by stacked-target activation. Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 13 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-019-00010-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-019-00010-0