Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

From low- to high-energy nuclear data evaluations

Issues and perspectives on nuclear reaction models and covariances

  • Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Evaluation of neutron cross sections between 0eV and 20MeV is based on several aspects of nuclear physics such as nuclear reaction and structure models and microscopic and integral measurements. Most of the time, the evaluation process is separately done in the resolved resonance range and the continuum. It may give rise to non-physical mismatches of cross sections and large uncertainties at boundaries. It also leads to an absence of cross correlations between high-energy domain and resonance range. In addition, integral experiments are sometimes only used to check central values (evaluation is “working fine” on a dedicated set of benchmarks). Eventual reduction of uncertainties on cross sections is not straightforward: “working fine” could be mathematically turned into reduced uncertainties. This paper will present several ideas that could be used to avoid such effects. They are based on basic physical principles, recent advances in terms of covariance evaluation methodologies, intensive use of Monte Carlo methods and High Performance Computing (HPC) and on some newly introduced models. A clear connection is made between resonance and continuum energy ranges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Bayes, M. Price, Philos. Trans. 53, 370 (1763)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Papoulis, S.U. Pillai, Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes (Tata McGraw-Hill, 2002)

  3. T.M. Cover, J.A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory, 2nd edition (Wiley, 2006)

  4. C. Robert, G. Casella, Monte Carlo Statistical Methods, Springer Texts in Statistics, 2nd edition (Springer, 2004)

  5. C. De Saint Jean, B. Habert, O. Litaize, G. Noguère, C. Suteau, Status of CONRAD, a nuclear reaction analysis tool, in International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology 2007, Vol. 1 (EDP Sciences, 2008) pp. 251--254

  6. P. Archier, C. De Saint Jean, O. Litaize, G. Noguère, L. Berge, E. Privas, P. Tamagno, Nucl. Data Sheets 118, 488 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. N. Larson, Updated Users Guide for SAMMY Multilevel $R$-Matrix Fits to Neutron Data Using Bayes Equation, 1998

  8. M.C. Moxon, T.C. Ware, C.J. Dean, REFIT-2009 A Least-Square Fitting Program for Resonance Analysis of Neutron Transmission, Capture, Fission and Scattering Data, Users Guide for REFIT-2009-10

  9. D.L. Smith, in Proceedings of the 8th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Applications and Utilization of Accelerators (ANS, 2007) p. 736

  10. R. Capote, D.L. Smith, Nucl. Data Sheets 109, 2768 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. F. Fröhner, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 126, 1 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. De Saint Jean, G. Noguère, B. Habert, B. Iooss, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 161, 363 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. B. Habert, C. De Saint Jean, G. Noguère, L.C. Leal, Y. Rugama, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 166, 276 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. G. Noguère, D. Bernard, C. De Saint Jean, B. Iooss, F. Gunsing, K. Kobayashi, S.F. Mughabghab, P. Siegler, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 160, 108 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. P. Schillebeeckx, B. Becker, Y. Danon, K. Guber, H. Harada, J. Heyse, A. Junghans, S. Kopecky, C. Massimi, M. Moxon, N. Otuka, I. Sirakov, K. Volev, Nucl. Data Sheets 113, 3054 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. A.M. Lane, R.G. Thomas, Rev. Mod. Phys. 30, 257 (1958)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. I.A. Stegun, M. Abramowitz, Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables (National Bureau of Standards, 1964)

  18. E. Vogt, Rev. Mod. Phys. 34, 723 (1962)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. E.P. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 70, 15 (1946)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. E.P. Wigner, L. Eisenbud, Phys. Rev. 72, 29 (1947)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. C.W. Reich, M.S. Moore, Phys. Rev. 111, 929 (1958)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. M. Herman, A. Trkov, ENDF-6 Formats Manual. Data Formats and Procedures for the Evaluated Nuclear Data File ENDF/B-VI and ENDF/B-VII, Tech. Rep. BNL-90365-2009, Brookhaven National Laboratory, 2010

  23. W. Hauser, H. Feshbach, Phys. Rev. 87, 366 (1952)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. D.L. Hill, J.A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 89, 1102 (1953)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. P. Hodgson, Nuclear Reactions and Nuclear Structure, International Series of Monographs on Physics (Clarendon Press, 1971)

  26. J. Raynal, Notes on ECIS94, Tech. Rep. CEA-N-2772, p. 1, Commisariat à l’Énergie Atomique, France, 1994

  27. F.H. Fröhner, Evaluation and Analysis of Nuclear Resonance Data, Tech. Rep. JEFF Report 18, Nuclear Energy Agency, 2000

  28. V.M. Strutinsky, Nucl. Phys. A 95, 420 (1967)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. S. Bjørnholm, J.E. Lynn, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 725 (1980)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. A. Koning, D. Rochman, Nucl. Data Sheets 113, 2841 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. C. De Saint Jean, B. Habert, P. Archier, G. Noguère, D. Bernard, J. Tommasi, P. Blaise, International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology - ND2010, Vol. 59 (2010) p. 1276

  32. G. Palmiotti, H. Hiruta, M. Salvatores, M. Herman, P. Oblozinsky, M.T. Pigni, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 59, 1123 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. F.B. Guimarães, TNG-GENOA User’s Manual, Tech. Rep. ORNL-TM-2000-252, Oak Ridge National Lab., 2001

  34. C. De Saint Jean, E. Privas, P. Archier, G. Noguère, Nucl. Data Sheets 118, 336 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. P. Archier, G. Noguère, C. De Saint Jean, A.J. Plompen, C. Rouki, Nucl. Data Sheets 118, 140 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. C. Rouki, P. Archier, C. Borcea, C. De Saint Jean, J. Drohé, S. Kopecky, A. Moens, N. Nankov, A. Negret, G. Noguère, A.J. Plompen, M. Stanoiu, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 672, 82 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. D. Larson, J. Harvey, N. Hill, Measurement of the Neutron Total Cross Section of Sodium from 32 keV to MeV, Oct. 1976

  38. B. Becker, S. Kopecky, P. Schillebeeckx, Nucl. Data Sheets 123, 171 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. G. Noguère, P. Archier, B. Habert, C. De Saint Jean, D. Bernard, J. Tommasi, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 59, 1343 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. D. Rochman, A.J. Koning, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 169, 68 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. E. Vogt, $R$-Matrix Theory (Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics at Notre Dame University, South Bend, Indiana, 2004)

  42. J.-P. Delaroche, C. Lagrange, J. Salvy, Proceedings of a consultants meeting on the use of nuclear theory in neutron nuclear data evaluation organized by the IAEA nuclear data section in co-operation with the International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste and held at Trieste, 8--11 December 1975 (Nuclear Theory in Neutron Nuclear Data Evaluation, IAEA, 1976)

  43. E. Rich, A. Tudora, G. Noguère, J. Tommasi, J.-F. Lebrat, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 162, 178 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. F.H. Fröhner, O. Bouland, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 137, 70 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  45. J.E. Lynn, Structure in sub-threshold fission modes, Tech. Rep. AERE-R--5891, Atomic Energy Research Establishment, Harwell (England) Jan. 1968

  46. J.E. Lynn, J. Phys. A: Math. Nucl. Gen. 6, 542 (1973)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. H. Yamamoto, Y. Kanie, K. Taniguchi, Phys. Status Solidi B 167, 571 (1991)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. L.W. Weston, J.H. Todd, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 88, 567 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  49. C.E. Porter, R.G. Thomas, Phys. Rev. 104, 483 (1956)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. J.D. Cramer, J.R. Nix, Phys. Rev. C 2, 1048 (1970)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. D.N. Poenaru, R.A. Gherghescu, W. Greiner, Rom. J. Phys. 50, 187 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  52. O. von Roos, Phys. Rev. B 27, 7547 (1983)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. D.J. BenDaniel, C.B. Duke, Phys. Rev. 152, 683 (1966)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. O. Bouland, J. Lynn, P. Talou, Nucl. Data Sheets 118, 211 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. V. Stavinsky, M. Shaker, Nucl. Phys. 62, 667 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. J. Lynn, Phys. Lett. 18, 31 (1965)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. O. Bouland, J.E. Lynn, P. Talou, Phys. Rev. C 88, 054612 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. O.A. Shcherbakov, Sov. J. Part. Nucl. 21, 177 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  59. S.F. Mughabghab, Atlas of Neutron Resonances: Resonance Parameters and Thermal Cross Sections Z = 1–100 (Elsevier Science, 2006)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Tamagno.

Additional information

Communicated by N. Alamanos

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tamagno, P., De Saint Jean, C., Bouland, O. et al. From low- to high-energy nuclear data evaluations. Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 181 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2015-15181-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2015-15181-1

Keywords

Navigation