Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Determination of carbon and nitrogen in microbial biomass of southern-Taiga soils by different methods

  • Soil Biology
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The results of methods for determining microbial biomass carbon vary in reproducibility among soils. The fumigation-extraction and substrate-induced respiration methods give similar results for Albic Luvisol and Gleyic Fluvisol, while the results of the rehydration method are reliably higher. In Histic Fluvisol, relatively similar results are obtained using the fumigation-extraction and rehydration methods, and the substrate-induced respiration method gives almost halved results. The seasonal dynamics of microbial biomass carbon also varies depending on the method used. The highest difference is typical for the warm period, when the concentrations found by the extraction and substrate-induced methods poorly agree between two out of three soils studied. The concentration of microbial biomass nitrogen is less sensitive to the analytical method: the differences between the results of the fumigation-extraction and rehydration methods are statistically insignificant in the all soils. To reveal stable relationships between the results of determining microbial carbon and the soil properties and analytical method, a large diversity of soils should be studied. This will allow for proposing of conversion factors for the recalculation of the obtained values to the concentrations of carbon and nitrogen in microbial biomass for different soils (or soil groups) and, hence, the more correct comparison of the results obtained by different methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. D. Ananyeva, E. V. Blagodatskaya, D. B. Orlinskii, T. N. Myakshina, “Determination of the rate of substrate-induced respiration of soil microorganisms,” Pochvovedenie, No. 11, 72–77 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. D. Ananyeva, L. M. Polyanskaya, E. A. Susyan, I. V. Vasenkina, S. Wirth, and D. G. Zvyagintsev, “Comparative assessment of soil microbial biomass determined by the methods of direct microscopy and substrate-induced respiration,” Microbiology (Moscow) 77 (3), 356–364 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. N. D. Ananyeva, E. A. Susyan, and E. G. Gavrilenko, “Determination of the soil microbial biomass carbon using the method of substrate-induced respiration,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 44 (11), 1215–1221 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S. A. Blagodatsky, E. V. Blagodatskaya, A. Yu. Gorbenko, and N. S. Panikov, “Rehydration method for determination of the biomass of microorganisms in soil,” Pochvovedenie, No. 4, 64–71 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. G. Gavrilenko, E. A. Susyan, N. D. Anan’eva, and O. A. Makarov, “Spatial variability in the carbon of microbial biomass and microbial respiration in soils of the south of Moscow oblast,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 44 (10), 1125–1138 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. I. V. Yevdokimov, S. Saha, S. A. Blagodatsky, and V. N. Kudeyarov, “Nitrogen immobilization by soil microorganisms depending on nitrogen application rates,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 38 (5), 516–523 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. I. Makarov, O. S. Mulyukova, T. I. Malysheva, and O. V. Menyailo, “Influence of drying of the samples on the transformation of nitrogen and carbon compounds in mountain-meadow alpine soils,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 46 (7), 778–787 (2013). doi 10.1134/S1064229313070053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. I. Makarov, T. I. Malysheva, O. S. Mulyukova, and O. V. Menyailo, “Freeze-thaw effect on the processes of transformation of carbon and nitrogen compounds in alpine meadow soils,” Russ. J. Ecol. 46 (4), 317–324 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. I. Makarov, M. S. Shuleva, T. I. Malysheva, and O. V. Menyailo, “Solubility of the labile forms of soil carbon and nitrogen in K2SO4 of different concentrations,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 46 (4), 369–374 (2013). doi 10.1134/S1064229313040091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. L. M. Polyanskaya, A. V. Golovchenko, and D. G. Zvyagintsev, “Microbial biomass in soils,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 344 (6), 846–848 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. S. Savost’yanova and A. A. Semikolennykh, “Comparison of the methods of determination of microbial biomass for analysis of biological properties of soils,” Izv. Samar. Nauch. Tsentra, Ross. Akad. Nauk 14 (1/8), 2064–2067 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. P. E. Anderson and K. H. Domsch, “A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soils,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 10, 215–221 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. T. H. Anderson and R. G. Joergensen, “Relationship between SIR and FE estimates of microbial biomass C in deciduous forest soils at different pH,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 29, 1033–1042 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. T. Beck, R. G. Joergensen, E. Kandeler, F. Makeschin, E. Nuss, H. R. Oberholzer, and S. Scheu, “An interlaboratory comparison of ten different ways of measuring soil microbial biomass C,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 29, 1023–1032 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. L. A. Babiuk and E. A. Paul, “The use of fluorescein isothiocyanate in the determination of the bacterial biomass of grassland soil,” Can. J. Microbiol. 16, 57–62 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S. A. Blagodatsky and I. V. Yevdokimov, “Extractability of microbial N as influenced by C: N ratio in the flush after drying or fumigation,” Biol. Fertil. Soils 28, 5–11 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. E. Bremer and C. van Kessel, “Extractability of microbial 14C and 15N following addition of variable rates of labeled glucose and (NH4)2SO4 to soil,” Soil. Biol. Biochem. 22, 707–713 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. P. C. Brookes, A. Landman, Q. Pruden, and D. S. Jenkinson, “Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 17, 837–842 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. W. Cheng and R. A. Virginia, “Measurement of microbial biomass in arctic tundra soils using fumigation extraction and substrate-induced respiration procedures,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 25, 135–141 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D. S. Jenkinson and J. M. Oades, “A method for measuring adenosine triphosphate in soil,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 11, 193–199 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. D. S. Jenkinson and D. S. Powlson, “The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil. V. A method for measuring soil biomass,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 8, 209–213 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. D. S. Jenkinson, D. S. Powlson, and R. W. M. Wedderburn, “The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil. III. The relationship between soil biovolume, measured by optical microscopy and the flush of decomposition caused by fumigation,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 8, 189–202 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. R. G. Joergensen, “Organic matter and micro-organisms in tropical soils,” in Soil Biology and Agriculture in the Tropics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2010), pp. 17–44.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. E. A. Kaiser, R. Martens, and O. Heinemyer, “Temporal changes in soil microbial biomass carbon in an arable soil. Consequences for soil sampling,” Plant Soil. 17, 287–295 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. E. A. Kaiser, T. Mueller, R. G. Joergensen, H. Insam, and O. Heinemyer, “Evaluation of methods to estimate the soil microbial biomass and the relationship with soil texture and organic matter,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 24, 675–683 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. M. I. Makarov, T. I. Malysheva, O. V. Menyailo, N. A. Soudzilovskaia, R. S. P. van Logtestijn, and J. H. C. Cornelissen, “Effect of K2SO4 concentration on extractability and isotope signature (d13C and d15N) of soil C and N fractions,” Eur. J. Soil Sci. 66 (3), 417–426 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. D. J. Ross, “Estimation of soil microbial C by a fumigation-extraction method: influence of seasons, soils and calibration with the fumigation-incubation procedure,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 22, 295–300 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. E. D. Vance, P. C. Brookes, and D. S. Jenkinson, “An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 19, 703–707 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. R. P. Voroney, J. P. Winter, R. P. Beyaert, “Soil microbial biomass C and N,” in Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, Ed. by M. R. Carter (Lewis, Chelsea, 1993), pp. 277–286.

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. Wu, R. G. Joergensen, B. Pommerening, R. Chaussod, and P. C. Brookes, “Measurement of soil microbial biomass C by fumigation extraction, an automated procedure,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 22, 1167–1169 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. X. Xu, K. Inubushi, and K. Sakamoto, “Effect of vegetation and temperature on microbial biomass carbon and metabolic quotients of temperate volcanic forest soils,” Geoderma 136, 310–319 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Z. Zhiong and E. Makeschin, “Differences of soil microbial biomass and nitrogen transformation under two forest types in central Germany,” Plant Soil. 283, 287–297 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Soil Science, Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia

    M. I. Makarov, T. I. Malysheva, M. N. Maslov & E. Yu. Kuznetsova

  2. Sukachev Institute of Forest, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Akademgorodok, Krasnoyarsk, 660036, Russia

    O. V. Menyailo

Authors
  1. M. I. Makarov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. I. Malysheva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. N. Maslov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E. Yu. Kuznetsova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. O. V. Menyailo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. I. Makarov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © M.I. Makarov, T.I. Malysheva, M.N. Maslov, E.Yu. Kuznetsova, O.V. Menyailo, 2016, published in Pochvovedenie, 2016, No. 6, pp. 733–744.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Makarov, M.I., Malysheva, T.I., Maslov, M.N. et al. Determination of carbon and nitrogen in microbial biomass of southern-Taiga soils by different methods. Eurasian Soil Sc. 49, 685–695 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229316060053

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229316060053

Keywords

Search

Navigation