Skip to main content
Log in

Detection of Erwinia amylovora by novel chromosomal polymerase chain reaction primers

  • Experimental Articles
  • Published:
Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new sensitive and specific method for the detection of Erwinia amylovora was developed. The method is based on the detection of a chromosomal DNA sequence specific for this bacterial species and enables detection of E. amylovora pathogenic strains, including recent isolates that lack plasmid pEA29 and thus cannot be detected by the previously popular PCR methods based on the detection of this plasmid. A species-specific random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) marker was identified, cloned, and sequenced, and sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) primers for specific PCR were developed. The E. amylovora specific sequence, 1269 bp long, was amplified in polymerase chain reaction and detected with electrophoresis in agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. Amplification with other bacterial species did not produce any PCR product detectable by electrophoresis. Matching of the E. amylovora specific sequence to chromosomal DNA was confirmed by computer analysis of the E. amylovora genome. A consistent sensitivity limit of the method was 3 CFU/reaction, and in some cases it was possible to detect 0.6 CFU/reaction. Due to its high sensitivity and specificity, our method of E. amylovora detection is currently the most reliable, taking into account that the reliability of PCR methods based on plasmid pEA29 has been compromised by the isolation of pathogenic E. amylovora strains that lack this plasmid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miller, T.D. and Schroth, M.N., Monitoring the Epiphytic Population of Erwinia Amylovora on Pear with a Selective Medium, Phytopathology, 1972, vol. 62, pp. 1175–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ishimaru, C. and Klos, E.J., New Medium for Detecting Erwinia Amylovora and Its Use in Epidemiological Studies, Phytopathology, 1984, vol. 74, pp. 1342–1345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Roberts, P., Problems Encountered during Immunofluorescence Diagnosis of Fireblight, Plant pathol., 1980, vol. 29, pp. 93–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lin, C.P., Chen, T.A., Wells, J.M., and van der Zwet, T., Identification and Detection of Erwinia Amylovora with Monoclonal Antibodies, Phytopathology, 1987, vol. 77, pp. 376–80.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Llop, P., Bonaterra, A., Penalver, J., and Lopez, M., Development of a Highly Sensitive Nested-PCR Procedure using a Single Closed Tube for Detection of Erwinia amylovora in Asimptomatic Plant Material, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2000, vol. 66, pp. 2071–2078.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Llop, P., Donat, V., Rodrigez, M., Cabrefiga, J., Ruz, L., Palomo, J.L., Montesinos, E., and Lopez, M.M., An Indigenous Virulent Strain of Erwinia amylovora Lacking the Ubiquitous Plasmid pEA29, Phytopathology, 2006, vol. 96, pp. 900–907.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bereswill, S., Bugert, P., Bruchmüller, I., and Geider, K., Identification of the Fire Blight Pathogen, Erwinia amylovora, by PCR Assay with Chromosomal DNA, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1995, vol. 61, pp. 2636–2642.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Maes, M., Garbeva, P., and Crepel, C., Identification and Sensitive Endophytic Detection of the Fire Blight Pathogen Erwinia amylovora with 23S Ribosomal DNA Sequences and the Polymerase Chain Reaction, Plant pathol., 1996, vol. 45, pp. 1139–1149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Guilford, P.J., Taylor, R.K., Clark, R.G., Hale. C.N., and Foster, R.L.S., PCR-Based Techniques for the Detection of Erwinia amylovora, Acta Hortic., 1996, vol. 411, pp. 53–56.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Taylor, R.K., Guilford, P.J., Clark, R.G., Hale, C.N., and Forster, R.L.S., Detection of Erwinia amylovora in Plant Material Using Novel Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Primers, New Zealand J. Crop Horticultural Sci., 2001, vol. 29, pp. 35–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Welsh, J. and McClelland, M., Fingerprinting Genomes using PCR with Arbitrary Primers, Nucleic Acids Res., 1990, vol. 18, pp. 7213–7218.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Williams, J. G. K., Kubelik, A.R., Livak, K.J., Rafalski, J.A., and Tingey, S.V., DNA Polymorphisms Amplified by Arbitrary Primers are Useful as Genetic Markers. Nucleic Acids Res., 1990, vol. 18, pp. 6531–6535.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Paran, I. and Michelmore, R.W., Development of Reliable PCR-Based Markers Linked to Downy Mildew Resistance Genes in Lettuce, Theor. Appl. Genet., 1993, vol. 85, pp. 985–993.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sambrook. J., Fritsch, E.E., and Maniatis, T., Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd edition, Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Llop, P., Caruso, P., Cuberto, J., Morente, C., and Lopez, M.M., A Simple Extraction Procedure for Efficient Routine Detection of Pathogenic Bacteria in Plant Material by Polymerase Chain Reaction, J. Microbiol. Methods, 1999, vol. 37, pp. 23–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosello, M., Vidal, S.G., Tarin, A., Llop, P., Goris, M.T., Donat, V., Chartier, R., Paulin, J.P., Gardan, L., Penalver, J., and Lopez, M.M., Characterization of an Erwinia sp. Isolated from Necrotic Pear Blossoms in Valencia, Spain, Acta Hortic., 2002, vol. 590, pp. 139–142.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Salm, H. and Geider, K., Real-time PCR for Detection and Quantification of Erwinia amylovora, the Causal Agent of Fireblight, Plant pathol., 2004, vol. 53, pp. 602–610.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown, E.W., Janisiewicz, W., and van der Zwet, T., Preliminary Phenotypic and Genetic Differentiation of the Fire Blight Bacterium Erwinia amylovora, Acta Hortic., 1996, vol. 411, pp. 199–210.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Brennan, J.M., Doohan, F.M., Egan, D., Scanlan, H., and Hayes, D., Characterization and Differentiation of Irish Erwinia amylovora Isolates, J. Phytopathol., 2002, vol. 150, pp. 414–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kreader, C.A., Relief of Amplification Inhibition in PCR with Bovine Serum Albumin or T4 Gene 32 Protein. Appl. Environ, Microbiol., 1996, vol. 62, pp. 1102–1106.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nagai, M., Yoshida, A., and Sato, N., Additive Effects of Bovine Serum Albumin, Dithiothreitol, and Glycerol on PCR, Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int., 1998, vol. 44, pp. 157–163.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. PCR Technology: Principles and Applications for DNA Amplification, Ed. Erlich, H.A. New York: Stockton Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  23. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, Eds. Innis, M.A., White, T.J., and Sninsky, J.J. San Diego, California: Academic Press, Inc., 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Obradovic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Obradovic, D., Balaz, J. & Kevresan, S. Detection of Erwinia amylovora by novel chromosomal polymerase chain reaction primers. Microbiology 76, 748–756 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1134/S002626170706015X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S002626170706015X

Key words

Navigation