References
Chakraborty, S., Sarker, S., & Sarker, S. (2010). Understanding the process of requirements elicitation: A grounded approach. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(4), 212–249.
Gregor, S. and Klein, G. (2014). Eight obstacles to overcome in the theory testing genre, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 15(11), pp. i–xix, Article 5.
Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 386–408.
Lankton, N.K., McKnight, D.H. and Tripp, J. (2015) Technology, humanness, and trust: Rethinking trust in technology, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 16(10), pp. 880–918, Article 1
Light, R. J., Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (1990). By Design: Planning Research on Higher Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Prasad, P. (1997). Systems of Meaning: Ethnography as a Methodology for the Study of Information Technologies. In A. Lee, J. Liebenau, & J. DeGross (Eds.), Information Systems and Qualitative Research. London: Chapman & Hall.
Sarker, S., & Sahay, S. (2004). Implications of space and time for distributed work: An interpretive study of US-Norwegian systems development teams. European Journal of Information Systems, 13(1), 3–20.
Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4, 74–81.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sarker, S. Building on Davison and Martinsons’ concerns: a call for balance between contextual specificity and generality in IS research. J Inf Technol 31, 250–253 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-016-0003-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-016-0003-9