Skip to main content

Canadian Arctic Shipping Regulations and the Law of the Sea

  • Chapter
Governing the North American Arctic

Part of the book series: St Antony’s Series ((STANTS))

Abstract

As Arctic nations look to develop shipping regulations, Canadian statutes — and their intersection with the international law of the sea and the rules adopted by the International Maritime Organization — are instructive for ensuring safety and security in the unique marine polar environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. All have asserted a territorial sea claim adjacent to ‘their’ Antarctic territories, although only Argentina and Chile have claimed an EEZ. D. R. Rothwell (1996) The Polar Regions and the Development of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 276–81. Australia briefly adopted authority to enforce its fishing laws in an Antarctic EEZ, but then let the law expire shortly thereafter.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Kraska (2011) Maritime Power and Law of the Sea (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. 294.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. See also, S. B. Kaye and D. R. Rothwell (2002) ‘Southern Ocean Boundaries and Maritime Claims: Another Antarctic Challenge for the Law of the Sea?’, Ocean Development and International Law, 33:4–4, 364–5;

    Google Scholar 

  4. and S. Kaye and D. R. Rothwell (1995) ‘Australia’s Antarctic Maritime Claims and Boundaries’, Ocean Development and International Law, 26:3, 195–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. IMO Doc. MSC/Circ.1056/IMO Doc. MEPC/Circ.399, Guidelines for ships operating in Arctic ice-covered waters, 23 December 2002 and IMO Doc. A.1024(26), Guidelines for Ships Operating in Polar Waters, 2 December 2009, reprinted, International Maritime Organization, IMO Pub. Sales No. E190E, Guidelines for Ships Operating in Polar Waters (2010) (Polar Code). Similarly, for a dispute concerning the term ‘best available scientific evidence’, see A. W. Harris (2005) ‘The Best Scientific Evidence Available: The Whaling Moratorium and Divergent Interpretations of Science’, William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, 29, 375–450.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 James Kraska

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kraska, J. (2016). Canadian Arctic Shipping Regulations and the Law of the Sea. In: Berry, D.A., Bowles, N., Jones, H. (eds) Governing the North American Arctic. St Antony’s Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137493910_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics