Skip to main content

Military Cooperation and Enhanced Arctic Security in the Context of Climate Change and Growing Global Interest in the Arctic

  • Chapter
Future Security of the Global Arctic: State Policy, Economic Security and Climate

Abstract

Transformation occurring in the Arctic raises many questions about the specificity and prospects of the regional security, including the multi- and bilateral military relations among the Arctic states. It is significant that though the majority of security challenges and threats to the region are of a nonmilitary character, the view that the projection of military power is indispensable in the Arctic seems to be well founded. This chapter provides an overview of selected forms of military cooperation developed in the Arctic during the past decade and their impacts on the regional security. It concludes that this cooperation will have to prove its effectiveness in very new circumstances framed by the tensions growing in the other parts of the globe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Auchet, M. (2011) ‘Greenland at the Crossroads: What Strategy for the Arctic?’, International Journal, 66 (4), 957–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baev, P.K. (2009) ‘Troublemaking and Risk-Taking: The North in Russian Military Activities’, in E. Wilson Rowe (ed.), Russia and the North (Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailes, A.J.K. and L. Heininen (2012) Strategy Papers on the Arctic or High North: A Comparative Study and Analysis ( Reykjavik: University of Iceland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blunden, M. (2012) ‘Geopolitics and the Northern Sea Route’, International Affairs, 88 (1), 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørn Brunstad, Eivind Magnus, Philip Swanson, Geir Hønneland and Indra Øverland (2004) Big Oil Playground, Russian Bear Preserve or European Periphery? The Russian Barents Sea Region towards 2015 ( Delft: Eburon Academic Publishers ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chairman’s Conclusions (2009) ‘Seminar on Security Prospects in the High North’, Reykjavík, January 29, 2009, http://www.mfa.is/publications/aifs/nr/4801, date accessed June 16, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, H.A. et al. (2012) A New Security Architecture for the Arctic. An American Perspective ( Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Depledge, D. and K. Dodds (2012) ‘Testing the Northern Flank. The UK, Norway and Exercise Cold Response’, The RUSI Journal, 157 (4), 72–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diesen, S. (2008) ‘Security and the Northern region’, in R. Gottemoeller and R. Tamnes (eds.), High North: High Stakes. Security, Energy Transport, Environment ( Bergen: Fagbokforlarget ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, K. (2010) ‘Flag Planting and Finger Pointing: The Law of the Sea, the Arctic and the Political Geographies of the Outer Continental Shelf’, Political Geography, 29 (2), 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, K. (2012) ‘Graduated and Paternal Sovereignty: Stephen Harper, Operation Nanook 10, and the Canadian Arctic’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30 (6), 989–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, K. and V. Ingimundarson (2012) ‘Territorial Nationalism and Arctic Geopolitics: Iceland as an Arctic Coastal State’, The Polar Journal, 2 (1), 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, J. (1995) ‘Security in the Barents Region. Interpretations and Implications of the Norwegian Barents Initiative’, Cooperation and Conflict, 30 (3), 259–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, M. (2012) ‘Arctic Military Exercise Targets Human-Smuggling “Ecotourists”’, CBC News, http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2012/08/24/pol-harper-north-tour-friday.html, date accessed June 24, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, B.C. and F. Stammler (2009) ‘Arctic Climate Change Discourse: The Contrasting Politics of Research Agendas in the West and Russia’, Polar Research, 29 (1), 28–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, D. (2012) ‘The Tri-Command Strategy and Merging U.S.-Canada Arctic Foreign Policy’, http://www.infowars.com/the-tri-commandstrategy-and-merging-u-s-canada-arctic-foreign-policy/, date accessed June 21, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grätz, J. (2012) “The Arctic: Thaw with Conflict Potential”, CSS Analysis in Security Policy No. 118, http://www.sta.ethz.ch/content/download/3118/18305/version/1/file/CSS-Analysis_118.pdf, date accessed May 20, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haftendorn, H. (2011) ‘NATO and the Arctic: Is the Atlantic Alliance a Cold War Relic in a Peaceful Region Now Faced with Non-military Challenges?’, European Security, 20 (3), 337–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heininen, L. (2008) ‘Geopolitics of a Changing North. In: Seeking Balance in a Changing North’, in Proceedings from the 5th NRF Open Assembly in Anchorage, Alaska, http://www.rha.is/static/files/NRF/OpenAssemblies/Anchorage2008/a/5th_nrf_anc_2008_heininen_geopolitics_changing_north.pdf, date accessed June 13, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heininen, L. (2013) ‘Arctic Security — Global Dimension and Challenges, and National Policy Responses’, The Yearbook of Polar Law, 5, 93–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heininen, L. and B. Segerstâhl (2002) ‘International Negotiations Aiming at Reduction of Nuclear Risks in the Barents Region’, in R. Avenhaus, V. Kremenyuk and G. Sjöstedt (eds.), Containing the Atom. International Negotiations on Nuclear Security and Safety ( Lanham, MD: Lexington Books ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huebert, R. et al. (2012) ‘Climate Change & International Security: The Arctic as a Bellwether’, Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, http://www.c2es.org/publications/climate-change-internationalarctic-security, date accessed June 17, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • IISS, (2012) Forum for Arctic Climate Change and Security: Geoeconomics Workshop Report, http://www.iiss.org/-/media/Images/Events/events%20calendar%20from%20import/68147.pdf, date accessed June 28, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janicki, W. (2012) ‘Why Do They Need the Arctic? The First Partition of the Sea’, Arctic, 65 (1), 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristjansson, J.T. and M. Cela (2011) ‘Iceland as a “Powerful” Small State in the International Community’, http://stofnanir.hi.is/ams/sites/files/ams/Icelandworkingpaper-final.June2011.pdf, date accessed June 19, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Mière, C. and J. Mazo (2014) Arctic Opening: Insecurity and Opportunity ( London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M. and J. Kronbak (2010) ‘The Potential Economic Viability of Using the Northern Sea Route (NSR) as an Alternative Route between Asia and Europe’, Journal of Transport Geography, 18 (3), 434–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moe, A. (2010) ‘Russian and Norwegian Petroleum Strategies in the Barents Sea’, Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 1 (2), 225–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, A., D. Fjærtoft and I. Øverland (2011) ‘Space and Timing: Why Was the Barents Sea Delimitation Dispute Resolved in 2010?’, Polar Geography, 34 (3), 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R.W. (2012) ‘Arctic Politics in the Emerging Multipolar System: Challenges and Consequences’, The Polar Journal, 2 (1), 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NORAD (2012) ‘NORAD, USNORTHCOM and Canadian Joint Operations Command Commander Sign Cooperative U.S./Canada Documents’, http://www.northcom.mil/Newsroom/tabid/3104/Article/2956/norad-usnorthcom-and-canadian-joint-operationscommmand-commander-sign-cooperat.aspx, date accessed 11 June 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer, G. (2012) ‘Norway Hails Northern Eagle as Bridge-Builder’, http://www.defensenews.com/article/20120824/DEFREG01/308240002/Norway-Hails-Northern-Eagle-Bridgebuilder, date accessed May 24, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palosaari, T. and F. Möller (2003) ‘Security and Marginality: Arctic Europe after the Double Enlargement’, Cooperation and Conflict, 39 (3), 255–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, C. and B. Andersen (2012) ‘New Strategic Dynamics in the Arctic Region. Implications for National Security and International Collaboration’, Atlantisch Perspectief, 6, 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettersen, T. (2012) ‘Military Cooperation in the High North’, in A. Staalesen (ed.), Barents Review 2012. Barents Borders — Delimitation and Internationalization ( Kirkenes: The Norwegian Barents Secretariat ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosamond, A.B. (2011) ‘Perspectives on Security in the Arctic Area’, DIIS Report, http://www.diis.dk/graphics/Publications/Reports2011/RP2011–09-Arctic-security_web.pdf, date accessed May 26, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schissler, M.O. (2012) ‘Arctic Nations Meet to Discuss Communication, Maritime Domain Awareness Strategy’, http://www.eucom.mil/blog-post/24109/arctic-nations-meet-to-discuss-communicationmaritime-domain-awareness-strategy, date accessed May 23, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • US DoD (2010) Quadrennial Defense Review Report ( Arlington, VA: US Department of Defense).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vestergaard, C. (2010) ‘Conference on an Arctic Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone, Copenhagen’, DIIS Report, http://www.diis.dk/graphics/Publications/Reports2010/RP2010–03_arctic_nuclear_weapon_free_zone_web.pdf, date accessed June 05, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M. and S. Staples (2010) Ridding the Arctic of Nuclear Weapons: A Task Long Overdue. Toronto-Ottawa: Canadian Pugwash Group & Rideau Institute, http://www.arcticsecurity.org/docs/arctic-nuclearreport-web.pdf, date accessed June 07, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, B. (2011) ‘Operation Ignition. Task Force Iceland’, FrontLine Defence, 8 (5), 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wezeman, S.T. (2012) ‘Military Capabilities in the Arctic’, SIPRI Background Paper, http://books.sipri.org/files/misc/SIPRIBP1203.pdf, date accessed June 17, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • WMD (2012a) ‘Pomor-2012 Exercise Finished with Call at Bodø, Norway, Western Military District Press Service’, http://rusnavy.com/news/newsofday/index.php?ELEMENT_ID=15138&print=Y, date accessed June 02, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • WMD (2012b) ‘Russian Military Exercises in Arctic’, Western Military District Press Service, http://rusnavy.com/news/newsofday/index.php?ELEMENT_ID=15999, date accessed June 02, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O.R. (2011) ‘Foreword — Arctic Futures: The Politics of Transformation’, in J. Kraska (ed.), Arctic Security in an Age of Climate Change ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Michał Łuszczuk

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Łuszczuk, M. (2016). Military Cooperation and Enhanced Arctic Security in the Context of Climate Change and Growing Global Interest in the Arctic. In: Heininen, L. (eds) Future Security of the Global Arctic: State Policy, Economic Security and Climate. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137468253_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics