Abstract
When mining companies develop their mines in remote lands, they often are criticized and protested against by the indigenous people who live there, and their supporters (Whiteman and Mamen, 2002). These people charge that the mines too often desecrate sacred lands, despoil natural environments, shatter local communities and enrich a few while impoverishing many others — leaving local residents worse rather than better off. The recently opened Raglan Mine in northern Quebec provides a contrasting example, in that it has been developed so far with the full cooperation of the Nunavik Inuit, the local indigenous people — and (so it seems) to their benefit.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
AEECG (1992): Aboriginal Employment Equity Consultation Group Aboriginal Employment and Community Relations: Best Practices in Canada (Ottawa: Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat).
Berger, T. R. (1977) Northern Frontier Northern Homeland: The Report of the McKenzie Valley Pipeline Inquity (Toronto: James Lorimer and Company).
Cleghorn, C. (1999) ‘Aboriginal Peoples and Mining in Canada: Six Case Studies’ [online text], MiningWatch Canada (Ottawa) (updated 13 September 2003) http://www.miningwatch.ca/issues/aboriginal_gathering/Case_Studies.html
Cornell, S. and Kalt, J. P. (eds) (2002) What Can Tribes Do? Strategies and Institutians in American Indian Economic Development (Los Angeles: American Indian Studies Center).
Drummond, S. G. (1997) Incorporating the Familiar: An investigation into Legal Sensibilities in Nunavik (Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press).
Gagnon, A. -G. and Tully, J. (eds) (2001) Multinational Democracies (Cambridge University Press).
INAC (1993): Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, ‘The James Bay and Northern Québec Agreement and the Northeastern Quebec Agreement: History’ [website] (updated July 1993) http://www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/pr/info/info14_e.html
INAC (2000): Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, ‘Principal Provisions of JBNQA and NEQA’ at James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement and The Northeastern Quebec Agreement, 1998–1999 Annual Report, 1999–2000 Annual Report, [website] (n.d.) http://www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/pr/agr/que/cin005_e.pdf
International Council on Metals and the Environment (1998) ‘The Raglan Project’, Case Study C (photocopy).
James Bay and Northern Québec Agreement and Complementary Agreements, 1988 edn (Quebec City: Publications Québec), Indian and Northern Affairs Canada [website] (n.d.) http://www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/pr/agr/que/jbnq_e.PDF
Jensen, J. and Papillon, M. (2000) ‘Challenging Citizenship Regimes: The James Bay Crees and Transnational Action’, Politics and Society, vol. 28(2), pp. 245–64.
Kymlicka, W. (1995) Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Pelly, D. F. (1995) ‘The Faces of Nunavik’, Canadian Geographic, vol. 115 (January), p. 14ff.
Stackhouse, J. (2001) ‘Everyone Thought We Were Stupid: Canadian Apartheid, Part 15’, Globe and Mail, 14 December.
Whiteman, G. and Mamen, K. (2002) Meaningful Consultation and Participation in the Mining Sector? A Review of the Consultation and Participation of Indigenous Peoples within the International Mining Sector [online text] (Ottawa: The North—South Institute) http://www.nsi-ins.ca/download/lit_rev/lit_rev_final.pdf
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2004 Frederick Bird and Robert Nixon
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bird, F., Nixon, R. (2004). The Raglan Mine and Nunavik Inuit. In: Bird, F., Herman, S.W. (eds) International Businesses and the Challenges of Poverty in the Developing World. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522503_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522503_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51533-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-52250-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)