Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Strategic Thought in Northeast Asia ((STNA))

  • 137 Accesses

Abstract

Over the past 615 years since the Mongols were expelled from the land, Korea has experienced 500 years of dependence on China, 40 years of dominance by Japan, 60 years of divided reliance on the United States in the South and mostly on the Soviet Union in the North, and just a few decades when it was even possible to search for autonomy through a balance of powers.1 The concept of sada recalls how Koreans work with a hegemonic power to keep control of their own destiny or, if unavoidable, just to achieve partial autonomy. When deterring war with the North at last no longer seemed necessary, the goal of expanding national independence or even ending sada rose to the fore but with disappointing results. Many see the United States trying to retain its dominance, China inclined to reassert its, Japan eyeing ways to reimpose its, and Russia not to be ignored.2 Hopes endure, however, of seizing a rare opportunity to work with all of these countries to find a balance conducive to reunification, more sovereign control, and regional influence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Charles K. Armstrong, Gilbert Rozman, Samuel S. Kim, and Stephen Kotkin, eds., Korea at the Center: Dynamics of Regionalism in Northeast Asia (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sangwoo Rhee, “Introduction,” in Sangwoo Rhee and Taehyo Kim, eds., Korea-Japan Security Relations: Prescriptive Studie (Seoul: New Asia Research Institute, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hong Nack Kim, “The Kim Dae-Jung Government’s North Korea Policy,” Korea & World Affair, Vol. 29, No. 2 (2005), pp. 520–40.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kohari Susumu, “Roh Moo-hyun seiken wa naze ‘tainichi kyoko’ ni natta noka?” Sekai shuh, 2005, pp. 50–51.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yu-hwan Koh, “Roh Moo-hyun Administration’s North Korea Policy and Nuclear Crisis Management,” Korea & World Affair, Vol. 30, No. 1 (2006), pp. 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chung Min Lee, “China’s Rise, Asia’s Dilemma,” The National Interes, No. 81 (2005), pp. 88–94.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lee Wook Yon, “Korea-China Cultural Relations and a ‘Communal House,’” Korea Focu, Vol. 13, No. 1 (2005), pp. 125–38.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yang Giho, “Ilbuk gwangye oe jonchi gyongjejok,” in Chong Jinoe, ed., Saeroun Dongbuka jilso oa Hanband (Seoul: Homansha, 1998), pp. 502–21.

    Google Scholar 

  9. David Kang, “Japan: U.S. Partner or Focused on Abductees,” The Washington Quarterl, Vol. 28, No. 4 (2005), pp. 107–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Scott Snyder, “South Korea’s Squeeze Play,” The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 4 (2005), pp. 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chung Taeik, “Bukhan haekmunje taihan Roshia oe ipjang mit shisajom” Oigy (2003), pp. 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kuon Oguk, “Kuraedo 6jahoidam oe yuilhan haebop,” Tongil Hanguk (2005), pp. 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cho Hanbom, “Bukhan oe taehan yonghyangryok jisok ul tonghan tae Hanbando palongwon kanghwa rul uido,” Bukha (2005), pp. 53–56.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chong Huisok, “Dongbuka dajaanbo hyopryok goa Roshia,” Hanguk jongji oigyosa ronchon, Vol. 27, No. 2 (2006), pp. 429–63.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yon Hyonshik, “Roshia yonbang oigyo jongchaek goa Hanbando tongil,” Jongsuyong, (2005), pp. 152–63.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee Chulkee, “Strategic Flexibility of U.S. Forces in Korea,” 2006, http://www.nautilus.org/fora/security/0619Lee.html.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2011 Gilbert Rozman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rozman, G. (2011). The South Korean Response: The Regional Context. In: Strategic Thinking about the Korean Nuclear Crisis. Strategic Thought in Northeast Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230116399_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics