Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From Foundation Conference to Government

  • Chapter
Britain’s First Labour Government

  • 52 Accesses

Abstract

On leaving his Whitehall office on a cold January evening in 1924, Thomas Jones, Assistant Cabinet Secretary, saw the newspaper placards announcing: ‘Lenin Dead [official]. Ramsay MacDonald Premier.’1 After six weeks of political uncertainty and rumours, Britain’s first-ever Labour government had taken office with its Scottish leader as prime minister and foreign secretary. The general election in December 1923 had produced an inconclusive result — Conservatives 258, Labour 191 and Liberals 158. Stanley Baldwin, the Conservative Prime Minister, had waited to resign until defeated in the new Parliament on 21 January 1924. At this time, democratically elected left-wing governments had already taken office in Western Europe — in Sweden (as a Social Democratic — Liberal coalition in 1917 and in 1920 as a minority administration) and in Germany (where the SPD joined the 1918 coalition in the Weimar Republic).2 In Australia, seen as a laboratory for social democratic politics, the ministry formed by the Australian Labour Party in Queensland in 1899 before federation — albeit for a few days — was the first Labour government in the world. New Zealand was also a pioneer of Labour administrations, where the first Labour MP was elected in 1905, the New Zealand Labour Party founded in 1916 and a majority Labour government led by Michael Savage was returned in 1935.3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Thomas Jones, Whitehall Diary Volume 1: 1916–1925, ed. Keith Middlemas (London: Oxford University Press, 1960), p. 266 (diary entry; 22 January 1924).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Donald Sassoon, One Hundred Years of Socialism: The West European Left in the Twentieth Century (New York: The New Press, 1996), ch. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Interview with John Fisher (grandson of Andrew Fisher 1862–1928, Prime Minister of Australia in 1908, 1910–13, 1914–15 and a minister in the world’s first Labour government in 1899), University of Sydney, 21 November 2003. For a photograph of Andrew and Margaret Fisher with Ramsay and Margaret MacDonald with their daughter Joan in 1911, see David Marquand, Ramsay MacDonald (London: Jonathan Cape, 1977), between pp. 352 and 353.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Robert Rhodes James (ed.), Winston S. Churchill: His Complete Speeches, 18971963, Vol. HI: 1914–1922 (New York and London: Chelsea House in association with R. R. Bowker, 1974), p. 2921.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harold Nicolson, King George V: His Life and Reign (London: Constable, 1984), p. 384.

    Google Scholar 

  6. David Jarvis, ‘Stanley Baldwin and the Ideology of the Conservative Response to Socialism 1918–1931’ (University of Lancaster, PhD thesis, 1991), p. 139 quoted in Martin Pugh, “‘Class Traitors”: Conservative Recruits to Labour, 1900–30’, in English Historical Review, vol. cxiii, No. 450 (1998), p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lloyd George to Megan Lloyd George, 4 February 1924, in Kenneth O. Morgan (ed.), Lloyd George Family Letters, 1885–1936 (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1973), p. 202.

    Google Scholar 

  8. For the Gill Bennett Report, see Foreign and Commonwealth Office, ‘A Most Extraordinary and Mysterious Business’: The Zinoviev Letter of 1924 (London: Historians, LRD, No. 14, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  9. For Margaret Bondfield, see Mary Agnes Hamilton, Margaret Bondfield (London: Leonard Parsons, 1924).

    Google Scholar 

  10. For Clement Attlee, see Robert Pearce, Attlee (London: Longman, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Beatrice Webb’s Diaries, 1912–24, pp.17–18, quoted in R. T. McKenzie, British Political Parties: The Distribution of Power within The Conservative and Labour Parties (London: Mercury Books, 1963), p. 305.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Marquand, Ramsay MacDonald, particularly ch. 27; K. Laybourn, The Rise of Labour: The British Labour Party, 1890–1979 (London: Edward Arnold, 1988), ch. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jonathan Lawrence, ‘Labour — the myths it has lived by’, in Duncan Tanner, Pat Thane and Nick Tiratsoo (eds), Labour’s First Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), pp. 351–4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See David Marquand’s entry on Ramsay MacDonald in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004); Marquand, Ramsay MacDonald, pp. 1–2, 647–55; Layboum, The Rise of Labour, ch. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Richard Lyman, The First Labour Government (London: Chapman & Hall, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  16. David Howell, MacDonald’s Party: Labour Identities and Crisis, 1922–1931 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ralph Miliband, Parliamentary Socialism: A Study in the Politics of Labour (London: Merlin Press, 1972); Michael Newman, ‘Ralph Miliband and the Labour Party: from Parliamentary Socialism to “Bennism” ’, in John Callaghan, Steven Fielding and Steve Ludlam, Interpreting the Labour Party: Approaches to Labour Politics and History (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003), ch. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Paul Foot, The Vote: How It Was Won and How It Was Undermined (London: Viking, 2005), pp. 267–70, 427.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pat Thane, ‘Labour and Welfare’, in Duncan Tanner, Pat Thane and Nick Tiratsoo (eds), Labour’s First Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), pp. 90–4. For centenary histories, see also Brian Brivati and Richard Heffernan (eds), The Labour Party: A Centenary History (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000); Keith Layboum, A Century ofLabour: A History of the Labour Party, 1900–2000 (Stroud: Sutton Publishing, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Andrew Thorpe, A History of the British Labour Party (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001 edn), p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Keith Laybourn, ‘The Failure of Socialist Unity in Britain, c.1893–1914’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 6th series, vol. iv (London: Royal Historical Society, 1994), pp. 153–75.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ross McKibbin, The Evolution of the Labour Party, 1910–1924 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974), pp. 136–7. McKibbin gives slightly different figures but indicates that the union percentage was 60 per cent in the 1922 general election, 52 per cent in 1923 and 57 per cent in 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  23. For examples of socialist failure in the 1895 election, see David Howell, British Workers and the Independent Labour Party, 1888–1906 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1983), pp. 129–282 passim.

    Google Scholar 

  24. John Shepherd, George Lansbury: At the Heart of Old Labour (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kenneth O. Morgan (ed.), Labour In Power, 1945–1951 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985), p. 9; David Howell, ‘When was “The Forward March of Labour?” ’, Llafur, vol. 3, (1990), p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jack Reynolds and Keith Laybourn, Labour Heartland (Bradford: University of Bradford, 1986), pp.75–82; Laybourn, A Century of Labour, pp. 52–3.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Robert Taylor, ‘PLP’s first 100 years’, Tribune, 10 February 2006, pp. 8–9. See also, Geoff Hoon, “Organised socialism has risen in the night” ‘, ibid., pp. 10–11; David E. Martin, ’ “The Instruments of the People? The Parliamentary Labour Party in 1906”’, in David E. Martin and David Rubinstein (eds), Ideology and the Labour Movement: Essays Presented to John Saville (London: Croom Helm, 1979), ch. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  28. John Shepherd, ‘Labour and Parliament: The Lib.-Labs. as the First WorkingClass MPs, 1885–1906’, in Eugenio Biagini and Alastair Reid (eds), Currents of Radicalism: Popular Radicalism, Organised Labour and Party Politics in Britain, 1850–1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), pp. 208–1O.,

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kenneth O. Morgan, ‘The High and Low Politics of Labour: Keir Hardie to Michael Foot’, in Michael Bentley and John Stevenson (eds), High and Low Politics In Modern Britain (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983), pp. 286–7.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pamela M. Graves, Labour Women: Women in British Working-Class Politics, 1918–1939 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), passim.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bob Holton, British Syndicalism, 1900–1914: Myths and Realities (London: Pluto Press, 1978), passim.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ross McKibbin, The Evolution of the Labour Party 1910–1924 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983), pp. 82–6.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Duncan Tanner, Political Change and the LabourParty, 1900–1918 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), pp. 420–1.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Trevor Wilson, The Downfall of the Liberal Party, 1914–1935 (London: Collins, 1966), pp. 84–92.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Margaret Cole, Growing Up Into Revolution (London: Longmans, 1949), p. 86.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Chris Wrigley, Arthur Henderson (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1990), 114–21; F. M. Leventhal, Arthur Henderson (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1989), pp. 64–72.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kenneth D. Wald, ‘Advance by Retreat? The Formation of British Labour’s Electoral Strategy’, Journal of British Studies, 27:3 (July 1988), pp. 284–5.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Arthur Henderson, ‘The Outlook for Labour’, Contemporary Review, cxiit, (February 1918), p. 122 (emphasis added).

    Google Scholar 

  39. G. D. H. Cole, A History of the Labour Party From 1914 (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1948), pp. 140–1.

    Google Scholar 

  40. For a recent study, see Matthew Worley (ed.), Labour’s Grass Roots: Essays on the Activities of Local Labour Parties and Members, 1918–45 (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  41. For the Poplar Rates Revolt, see John Shepherd, George Lansbury: At the Heart Of Old Labour (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), ch. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Herbert Morrison, ‘London’s Labour Majority’, LabourMagazine, 8 (1929/30), p. 68, cited in Stefan Berger, ‘Labour in Comparative Perspective’, in Duncan Tanner, Pat Thane and Nick Tiratsoo (eds), Labour’s First Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), p. 315.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dominic Wring, ‘Selling Socialism: Marketing the Early Labour Party’, History Today (May 2005), pp. 41–3.

    Google Scholar 

  44. The best history of The Daily Herald is Huw Richards, The Bloody Circus: TheDaily Herald and the Left (London, Pluto Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Duncan Tanner, ‘The Labour Party and Electoral Politics in the Coalfields’, in Alan Campbell, Nina Fishman and David Howell (eds), Miners, Unions and Politics, 1910–47 (Aldershot: Scolar Press, 1996), pp. 59–92.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kenneth 0 Morgan, Consensus and Disunity: The Lloyd George Coalition Government, 1918–1922 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986), pp. 213–15.

    Google Scholar 

  47. David Powell, British Politics, 1910–1935: The Crisis of the Party System (London: Routledge, 2004), pp. 118–23.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Harold Laski to O. W. Holmes, 13 December 1923, in Mark DeWolfe (ed.), Holmes-Laski Letters: The Correspondence of Mr. Justice Holmes and Harold J. Laski, 1916–1935 (London: Oxford University Press, 1953), pp. 569–7O.,

    Google Scholar 

  49. Michael Newman, Harold Laski: A Political Biography (Basingstoke: Macmillan — now Palgrave Macmillan, 1993), pp. 69–71; Isaac Kramnick and Barry Sheerman, Harold Laski: A Life on the Left (London: 1993), passim.

    Google Scholar 

  50. There is an extensive literature. The main works include: Ross McKibbin, Evolution; Keith Laybourn and Jack Reynolds, Liberalism and the Rise of Labour, 1890–1918 (Beckenham: Croom Helm, 1984); Keith Laybourn, ‘The Rise of Labour and the Decline of Liberalism: The State of the Debate’, History, 80 (June 1995), pp. 207–26; P. F. Clarke, Lancashire and the New Liberalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971); Wilson, Downfall; Kenneth O. Morgan ’ The New Liberalism and the Challenge of Labour: The Welsh Experience, 1885–1929’, in Kenneth D. Brown (ed.), Essays in Anti-Labour History: Responses to theRise ofLabour (London: Macmillan, 1974), pp. 159–82; Michael Bentley, The Climax ofLiberal Politics: British Liberalism in Theory and Practice (London: Edward Arnold 1987); Duncan Tanner, Political Change and the Labour Party, 1900–1918 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lyman, The First Labour Government; Marquand, Ramsay MacDonald; Howell, MacDonald’s Party; Maurice Cowling, The Impact of Labour (Cambridge and London, Cambridge University Press, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Duncan Tanner, ‘Socialist Parties and Policies’, in Martin Pugh (ed.), A Companion to Modern European History, 1871–1945 (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997), pp.144–5O.,

    Google Scholar 

  53. James Joll, Intellectuals in Politics: Three Biographical Essays (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1960), pp. 26–8. We are grateful to Professor Kenneth O. Morgan for this reference. See also, Sassoon, One Hundred Years of Socialism, pp. 52–3.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sidney Webb to William Robson, 16 December 1923, Norman Mackenzie (ed.), The Letters of Sidney and Beatrice Webb, Volume 111: Pilgrimage, 1912–1947 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978), p. 186.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Egon Wertheimer, Portrait of The Labour Party (London: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1930), pp. 275, 284.

    Google Scholar 

  56. J. R. MacDonald, Socialism and Society (Independent Labour Party: 1905), p. xix.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Richard Lyman, The First Labour Government (1957), pp. 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  58. New Leader, 14 December 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  59. C. R. Attlee, As It Happened (London: Heinemann, 1954), pp. 58, 62.

    Google Scholar 

  60. J. H. Thomas, When Labour Rules (London: Collins, 1920), pp. 7, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Jonathan Davis, ‘Left Out in the Cold: British Labour Witnesses the Russian Revolution’, Revolutionary Russia, 18:1 (June 2005), pp. 71–81.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. John Shepherd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Keith Laybourn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2006 John Shepherd and Keith Laybourn

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shepherd, J., Laybourn, K. (2006). From Foundation Conference to Government. In: Britain’s First Labour Government. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287365_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287365_1

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51245-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28736-5

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation