Skip to main content

The Czech Case: From the Bohemian Slavophone Populus to Czech Nationalism and the Czechoslovak Nation

  • Chapter
The Politics of Language and Nationalism in Modern Central Europe
  • 185 Accesses

Abstract

Bohemia emerged as a separate polity after the Magyar conquest of Greater Moravia. The Frankish protection that extended to Bohemia attached this country to the empire, while Moravia became a province permanently linked to the Principality of Bohemia in the late 1020s. In 1079, Moravia was organized as a margraviate. Usually sons or younger brothers of the Bohemian princes reigned as margraves of Moravia, which emphasized the separateness of Moravia vis-à-vis Bohemia. A similar arrangement developed in Poland-Lithuania where sons or younger brothers of the King of Poland ruled in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania (Třeštík 1999: 140).

[W]e share the same noble Slavic idiom, and the sublimity of the same noble language.

Emperor Charles IV (King Charles I of the Crown of theCzech Lands) in his 1355 letter to Emperor (Tsar)Stephen Dušan of Serbia.1 (in Stankiewicz 1984: ix)

The first and best of all the Slavic dialects is the Czech language, which is [not spoken only by the Bohemians] but also by the Moravians and, partly, by the Silesians.

Jan Blahoslav (Blažek) (1523–1571), a bishop of the Czech Brethren, translator of the New Testament (1564), he also authored aCzech-language grammar of the Czech language (1571, publishedonly in 1857), from which the above quotation was taken (Orłoś1993: 28; Siatkowska 1992: 118–119).

Wherever your language and your nationhood are disregarded you are oppressed, no matter how liberal the country may be. […] [W]here your language is excluded from schools and offices, freedom is taken away from you, from your nation, more than by police or by censorship. […] [W]here your national language is excluded from offices and schools, the mouth of the people is tightly locked.

Karel Havlíček Borovský in Národní noviny, 1848 (In Fishman

1997: 202)

IfAustria did not exist she would have to be invented in the interest ofEurope and then Humankind.2

František Palacký, 1848 (In Monarchie 2007)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2009 Tomasz Kamusella

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kamusella, T. (2009). The Czech Case: From the Bohemian Slavophone Populus to Czech Nationalism and the Czechoslovak Nation. In: The Politics of Language and Nationalism in Modern Central Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230583474_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230583474_6

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-36196-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-58347-4

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics