Skip to main content
Log in

Morphological and Biomechanical Studies of Pedicle Screw Fixation for the Lower Cervical Spine

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Integration

Abstract

Based on eight specimens removedfrom fresh cadavers, the morphology of the pedicles of the C3–7cervical vertebrae was determined. Three preliminary designsof pedicle screw and finite element models of the screw withcervical vertebra were developed. The feasibility of pediclescrew fixation for the lower cervical spine is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Abumi, M. M. Panjabi, and J. Duraneau, “Biomehanical evaluation of spinal fixation devices. Part III. Stability provided by six spinal fixation devices and interbody bone graft.” Spine 14(11), pp. 1249–1255, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. B. Ashman, R. D. Galpin, and J. D. Corin et al., “Biomehanical analysis of pedicle screw instrumentation systems in a corpectomy model.” Spine 14(12), pp. 1398–1405, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. J. Banta, A. G. King, and E. J. Dobezies et al., “Measurement of effective pedicle diameter in the human spine.” Orthopaedics 12, pp. 939–942, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. L. Berry, J. M. Moran, and W. S. Berg et al., “A morphometric study of human lumbar and selected thoracic vertebrae.” Spine 12, pp. 362–367, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Cottrel, J. Dubousset, and M. Guillaumat, “Newuniversal instrumentation in spinal surgery.” Clin. Orthop. 227, pp. 10–23, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. J. DeSalvo and R.W. Gorman, ANSYS Engineering Analysis System, User's Manual. Swanson Analysis System, Inc.: Houston, Pa., May, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. C. George, M. H. Krag, and C. C. Johnson et al., “Hole preparation techniques for transpedicle screw: Effects on pull-out strength from human cadaveric vertebrae.” Spine 16(2), pp. 181–184, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. K. Goel, Y. E. Kim, and T. H. Lim et al., “An analysis investigation of the mechanics of spinal instrumentation.” Spine 13(9), pp. 1003–1011, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Gunzburg and R. D. Fraser, “Stress fracture of the lumbar pedicle, case reports of “pediculolysis” and review of the literature.” Spine 16(2), pp. 185–189, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. H. Krag, B. D. Beynnon, and M. H. Pope et al., “Short segments of the thoracic, lumbar, or lumbosacral spine, design and testing.” Clin. Orthop. 203, pp. 75–97, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. H. Krag, D. L. Weaver, B. D. Beynnon, and L. D. Haugh, “Morphometry of the thoracic and lumbar spine related to transpedicular screw placement for surgical spinal fixation.” Spine 13(1), pp. 27–32, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. Matsuzaki, Y. Tokuhashi, and F. Matsumoto et al., “Problems and solutions of pedicle screw plate fixation of lumbar spine.” Spine 15(11), pp. 1159–1165, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. R. Misenhimer, R. D. Peek, and L. L. Willtse et al., “Anatomic analysis of pedicle cortical and cancellous diameter as related to screw size.” Spine 14(4), pp. 368–372, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. X. Montesano, E. C. Juach, and P. A. Anderson et al., “Biomechanics of cervical spine internal fixation.” Spine 16(3, suppl.), pp. s10–s16, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. M. Moran, W. S. Berg, and J. L. Berry et al., “Transpedicular screw fixation.” J. Orthop. Res. 7(1), pp. 107–114, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. M. Olsewski, E. H. Simmons, and F. C. Kallen et al., “Morphometry of the lumbar spine: Anatomical perspectives related to transpedicular fixation.” J. Bone Joint Surg. 72A, pp. 541–549, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. M. Panjabi, K. Abumi, and J. Duranceau et al., “Biomechanical evaluation of spinal fixation devices: II. Stability provided by eight internal fixation devices.” Spine 13(10), pp. 1135–1140, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. M. Panjabi, K. Abumi, and J. Duranceau et al., “Biomechanical evaluation of spinal fixation devices: II. Stability provided by eight internal fixation devices.” Spine 13(10), pp. 1135–1140, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. M. Panjabi, A. A. White, and D. Keller et al., “Stability of the cervical spine under tension.” J. Biomech. 111, pp. 189, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  20. G. Saillant, “Etude anatonique des pedicles vertebreau, application chirurgicales.” Res Chir Orthop Traumatatol 62, pp. 151–160, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  21. K. Ueno and Y. K. Liu, “A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model for lumbar intervertebral joint in torsion.” J. Biomed. Eng. 109, p. 200, Aug. 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  22. N. Zheng, “An investigation of pedicle screw fixation for the lower cervical spine.” MSc thesis, University of Saskatchewan, 1991.

  23. M. R. Zindrick, L. L. Wiltse, and E. H. Widell et al., “Analysis of the morphometric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar pedicles.” Spine 12, pp. 160–166, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zheng, N., Yong-Hing, K. & Watson, L.G. Morphological and Biomechanical Studies of Pedicle Screw Fixation for the Lower Cervical Spine. Journal of Systems Integration 10, 55–66 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026559301696

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026559301696

Navigation