Skip to main content
Log in

Reference and Paradox

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evidence is drawn together to connect sources of inconsistency that Frege discerned in his foundations for arithmetic with the origins of the paradox derived by Russell in Basic Laws I and then with antinomies, paradoxes, contradictions, riddles associated with modal and intensional logics. Examined are: Frege's efforts to grasp logical objects; the philosophical arguments that compelled Russell to adopt a description theory of names and a eliminative theory of descriptions; the resurfacing of issues surrounding reference, descriptions, identity, substitutivity, paradox in the debates concerning modal and intensional logics; the development of the New Theory of Reference. I consider this to be the philosophical ground upon which the debates regarding that theory should take place.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Barcan, R.: 1946a, 'A Functional Calculus of First Order Based on Strict Implication', The Journal of Symbolic Logic 11, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barcan, R.: 1946b, 'The Deduction Theorem in a Functional Calculus of First Order Based on Strict Implication', The Journal of Symbolic Logic 11, 115–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barcan, R.: 1947, 'The Identity of Individuals in a Strict Functional Calculus of Second Order', The Journal of Symbolic Logic 12, 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boolos, G.: 1986/87, 'Saving Frege from Contradiction', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, N.S. 87, pp. 137–151, in W. Demopoulos (ed.), 1995, pp. 438–452.

  • Boolos, G.: 1987, 'The Consistency of Frege's Foundations of Arithmetic', in J. Jarvis Thomson (ed.), On Being and Saying, Essays in Honor of Richard Cartwright, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp. 3–20, in W. Demopoulos (ed.), 1995, pp. 211–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boolos, G.: 1990, 'The Standard of Equality of Numbers', Meaning and Method: Essays in Honor of Hilary Putnam, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 261–277, in W. Demopoulos (ed.), 1995, 234–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boolos, G.: 1996, 'Whence the Contradiction?', in Schirn(ed.), pp. 234–252. First published in the Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Vol. LXVII(1993), pp. 213–233.

  • Demopoulos, W. (ed.): 1995, Frege's Philosophy of Mathematics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1996, 'Reply to Boolos', in Schirn (ed.), pp. 253–260.

  • Fitch, F.: 1949, 'The Problem of the Morning Star and the Evening Star', Philosophy of Science 16, 131–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1879, 'Begriffsschrift, a Formula Language, Modeled upon that of Arithmetic for Pure Thought', in van Heijenoort (ed.), 1967, pp. 1–82.

  • Frege, G.: 1884, Foundations of Arithmetic, Blackwell, Oxford (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1892, 'On Sense and Reference', in Frege 1980b, pp. 56–78.

  • Frege, G.: 1893, Basic Laws of Arithmetic, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1903, 'Frege on Russell's Paradox', in Frege 1980b, pp. 214–224.

  • Frege, G.: 1979, Posthumous Writings, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1980a, Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1980b, Translations from the Philosophical Writings, P. Geach and M. Black (eds.), Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garciadiego, A.: 1992, Bertrand Russell and the Origins of the Set-theoretic 'Paradoxes', Birkhäuser, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, K.: 1964, 'What is Cantor's Continuum Problem', in S. Fefermann et al. (eds.), Kurt Gödel Collected Works, Vol. II, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 254–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grattan-Guinness, I.: 1972, 'Bertrand Russell on His Paradox and the Multiplicative Axiom: An Unpublished Letter to Philip Jourdain', Journal of Philosophical Logic 1, 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grattan-Guinness, I.: 1975, 'Preliminary Notes on the Historical Significance of Quantification and the Axiom of Choice in Mathematical Analysis', Historia Mathematica 2, 475–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grattan-Guinness, I.: 1977, Dear Russell-Dear Jourdain, a Commentary on Russell's Logic Based on his Correspondence with Philip Jourdain, Duckworth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R.: 1993, 'The Development of Arithmetic in Frege's Grundgesetze der Arithmetik', The Journal of Symbolic Logic 58, 579–601, in W. Demopoulos (ed.), 1995, pp. 257– 294.

  • Hill, C. O.: 1991, Word and Object in Husserl, Frege and Russell, the Roots of Twentieth Century Philosophy, Ohio University Press, Athens OH (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. O.: 1997a, Rethinking Identity and Metaphysics, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. O.: 1997b, 'The Varied Sorrows of Logical Abstraction', 10th Anniversary Issue of Axiomathes, Centro Studi per la Filsofia Mitteleuropa, Trento, Italy, pp. 53–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. O.: 1999, 'Review of The New Theory of Reference, P. Humphreys and J. Fetzer (eds.)', History and Philosophy of Logic 20, 125–127.

  • Hintikka, J.: 1962, Knowledge and Belief, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1969, Models for Modalities, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1975, The Intentions of Intentionality and Other New Models for Modalities, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. and D. Davidson (eds.): 1969, Words and Objections, Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine, D. Reidel, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, P. and J. Fetzer (eds.): 1998, The New Theory of Reference, Kripke, Marcus, and its Origins, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D. and R. Montague: 1960, 'A Paradox Regained', Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 1, 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilmister, C. W.: 1984, Russell, The Harvester Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1980, Naming and Necessity, Blackwell, Oxford, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1975, 'Outline of a Theory of Truth', Journal of Philosophy 72, 690–716, anthologized in Martin (ed.), pp. 53–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsky, L. (ed.): 1971, Reference and Modality, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, R.: 1960, 'Extensionality', Mind 69, 55–62, in Linsky (ed.), pp. 44–51.

  • Marcus, R.: 1993, Modalities, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. (ed.): 1984, Recent Essays on Truth and the Liar Paradox, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R.: 1963, 'Syntactical Treatments of Modality, with Corollaries on Reflexion Principles and Finite Axiomatizability', Proceedings of a Colloquium on Modal and Many-Valued Logics, Helsinki, 23–26 August, 1962, Acta Philosophica Fennica XVI,153–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen, M.: 1999, 'The Russell-Kaplan Paradox and the Model Paradoxes: A New Solution', Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 4(1). Published on the internet.

  • Prior, A. N.: 1961, 'On a Family of Paradoxes', Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic II, 16–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.: 1947a, 'The Problem of Interpreting Modal Logic', Journal of Symbolic Logic 12, 43–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.: 1947b, 'Review of Ruth C. Barcan, “The Deduction Theorem in a Functional Calculus of First Order Based on Strict Implication”', Journal of Symbolic Logic 12, 95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.: 1947c, 'Review of Ruth C. Barcan, “The Identity of Individuals in a Strict Functional Calculus of Second Order”', Journal of Symbolic Logic 12, 95–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.: 1953a, 'Reference and Modality', in From a Logical Point of View, Harper & Row, New York, 2nd edn., rev., 1961 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.: 1953b, 'Three Grades of Modal Development', in W. Quine (ed.), 1976, pp. 158–176.

  • Quine, W.: 1960, Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.: 1962, 'Reply to Professor Marcus', in W. Quine (ed.), 1976, pp. 177–184.

  • Quine, W.: 1969, Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.: 1976, Ways of Paradox, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.: 1994, 'Promoting Extensionality', Synthese 98, 143–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1903, Principles of Mathematics, Norton, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1905, 'On Denoting', in Russell 1956, pp. 41–56.

  • Russell, B.: 1919, Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1927, Principia Mathematica to * 56, 2nd edn., 1964, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1944, 'My Mental Development', in P. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, pp. 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1956, Logic and Knowledge, Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1959, My Philosophical Development, Allen & Unwin, London, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1973, Essays on Analysis, D. Lackey (ed.), Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schirn, M.: 1996a, 'On Frege's Introduction of Cardinal Numbers as Logical Objects', in M. Schirn (ed.), 1996, pp. 114–173.

  • Schirn, M. (ed.): 1996, Frege: Importance and Legacy, de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smullyan, A.: 1947, 'Review of Quine's 'The problem of Interpreting Modal Logic', Journal of Symbolic Logic 12, 139–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smullyan, A.: 1948, 'Modality and Description', Journal of Symbolic Logic 13, 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Heijenoort, J.: 1967, From Frege to Gödel, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartofsky, M. (ed.): 1963, Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science 1961/1962, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ortiz Hill, C. Reference and Paradox. Synthese 138, 207–232 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000013241.59493.1d

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000013241.59493.1d

Keywords

Navigation