Skip to main content
Log in

Primary Attachment to Parents and Peers during Adolescence: Differences by Attachment Style

  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the nature of adolescent attachment to parents and peers during adolescence. A projective measure was used to classify 99 11th and 12th grade students into secure, insecure dismissing, and insecure preoccupied attachment groups. Respondents identified their primary attachment figure by nomination and by rating the level of attachment support they received from mothers, fathers, best friends, and boy/girlfriends. On average, parents and peers were equally likely to be identified as primary attachment figures but individual preference was strongly tied to attachment style. Secure adolescents significantly favored mothers over best friends, boy/girlfriends, and fathers. Although secure adolescents with romantic partners rated mothers lower on attachment support, none of the adolescents from this group nominated a boy/girlfriend as their primary attachment figure. In contrast insecure adolescents indicated a strong preference for boy/girlfriends and best friends as their primary target for attachment and nearly a third of dismissing adolescents identified themselves as their primary attachment figure. Findings are discussed in terms of individual differences in attachment during adolescence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ainsworth, M. S. (1969). Object relations, dependency and attachment: A theoretical review of the infant—mother relationship. Child Dev. 40: 969–1025.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, M. S. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. Am. Psychol. 44(4): 709–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, K., and Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 61: 226–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, T. J. (1982). The features and effects of friendship in early adolescence. Child Dev. 53: 1447–1460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, T. J., and Perry, T. B. (1986). Children's perceptions of friendships as supportive relations. Dev. Psychol. 22(5): 640–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1969/1982). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 1: Attachment. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton, I. (1990). Open communication and internalworking models: Their role in the development of attachment relationships. In Thompson, R. A. (ed.), Socio-Emotional Development, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1988. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhrmester,D. (1990). Intimacy of friendship, interpersonal competence, and adjustment during preadolescence and adolescence. Child Dev. 61: 1101–1111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhrmester, D. (1996). Need fulfillment, interpersonal competence and the developmental contexts of early adolescent friendship. In Bukowski, W., Newcomb, A., and Hartup, W. (eds.), The Company They Keep: Friendship in Childhood and Adolescence. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 158–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhrmester, D., and Furman,W. (1987). The development of companionship and intimacy. Child Dev. 58: 1101–1113. Cassidy, J. (1999). The nature of the child's ties. In Cassidy, J., and Shaver, P. R. (eds.), Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research and Clinical Applications. The Guilford Press, New York, pp. 3—20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colin, V. L. (1996). Human Attachment. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowell, J. A., Fraley, C. R., and Shaver, P. R. (1999). Measurement of individual differences in adolescent and adult attachment. In Cassidy, J., and Shaver, P. R. (eds.), Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research and Clinical Applications. The Guilford Press, New York, pp. 434–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elicker, J., Englund, M., and Sroufe, L. A. (1992). Predicting peer competence and peer relationships in childhood from early parent—child relationships. In Parke, R. D., and Ladd, G. W. (eds.), Family-Peer Relationships: Modes of Linkage. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hilldale, NJ, pp. 77–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwisle, D. R., and Astone, N. M. (1994). Some practical guidelines for measuring youth's race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Child Dev. 64: 1521–1540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furman, W., and Buhrmester, D. (1985). Children's perceptions of the personal relationships in their social networks. Dev. Psychol. 21(6): 1016–1024.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, C., Kaplan, N., and Main, M. (1985). Adult Attachment Interview. University of California, Berkeley, Unpublisned manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, R.M. (1994). Measuring socioeconomic status in studies of child development. Child Dev. 64: 1541–1545

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazan, C., Hutt, M., Sturgeon, J., and Bricker, T. (1991, April). The Process of Relinquishing Parents as Attachment Figures. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle, WA.

  • Hunter, F. T., and Youniss, J. (1982). Changes in functions of three relations during adolescence. Dev. Psychol. 18: 806–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, N. (1985). Procedures for Administration of the Hansburg Separation Anxiety Test for Younger Children Adapted From Klagsbrun and Bowlby. Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobak, R. R., and Sceery,A. (1988). Attachment in late adolescence:Working models, affect regulation, and representations of self and others. Child Dev. 59: 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R., and Richards, M. H. (1991). Daily companionship in late childhood and early adolescence: Changing developmental contexts. Child Dev. 62: 284–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R., Richards, M., Moneta, G., Holmbeck, G., and Duckett, E. (1996). Changes in adolescents' daily interactions with their families from ages 10 to 18: Disengagement and transformation. Dev. Psychol. 32: 744–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, B. (1993). The perceived impact of conflict on adolescent relationships. Merrill-Palmer Q. 39(4): 535–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Main, M. (1991). Meta cognitive knowledge, metacognitive monitoring, and singular (coherent) vs. multiple (incoherent) model of attachment: Findings and directions for future research. In Parkes, C. M., Hinde, J. S., and Marris, P. (eds.), Attachment Across the Life Cycle. Tavistock Institute, New York, pp. 128–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Main, M., Kaplan, N., and Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: Amove to the level of representation. In Bretherton, I., and Waters, E. (eds.), Growing Points in Attachment Theory and Research: Monographs of the Society for Social Research in Child Development (Vol. 50(1—2, Serial No. 209)). pp. 66–104.

  • Marascuilo, L. A., and Serlin, R. C. (1988). Statistical Methods for the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. A., and Austin, A. B. (1995, April). Relatedness and autonomy aspects of self concept in 8-to 12-year-old children. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Indianapolis, IN.

  • Monck, E. (1991). Patterns of confiding relationships among adolescent girls. J. Child Psychiatry 32: 333–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, H. J., and Shaver, P. R. (1999). Attachment processes and commitment to romantic relationships. In Adams, J. M., and Jones, W. H. (eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Commitment and Relationship Stability. Plenum, New York, pp. 109–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, G. (1989). Individual Differences in Adolescent Attachment and Its Relationship to Family Cohesion and Adaptability. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Kansas City, MI.

  • Resnick, G., and Haynes, J. (1995, April). The Automated Separation Anxiety Test: Using Artificial Intelligence and Computer Multimedia to Enhance a Child Semi-Projective Measure. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Indianapolis, IN.

  • Rothbard, J. C., and Shaver, P. R. (1991). Continuity of attachment across the life span. In Sperling, M. B., and Berman,W. H. (eds.), Attachment in Adults: Clinical and Developmental Perspectives. The Guilford Press, New York, pp. 31–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savin-Williams, R., and Berndt, T. J. (1990). Friendship and peer relations. In Feldman, S., and Elliot, G. (eds.), At the Threshold: The Developing Adolescent. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 277–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, S., Levy-Shiff, R., Kedem, P., and Alon, E. (1997). Intimate relationships among adolescent romantic partners and same-sex friends: Individual and systematic perspectives. In Shulman, S., and Collins, A. W. (eds.), New Directions in Child Development. Romantic Relationships in Adolescence: Developmental Perspectives (vol. 78). pp. 37–52.

  • Simpson, J. (1990). Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 59: 971–980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sroufe, L. A., and Waters, E. (1977). Attachment as an organizational construct. Child Dev. 48: 1184–1199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L. (1990, August). Adolescent Development: An Ecological Perspective. Invited address to Division 7 (Developmental Psychology) of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.

  • Stevens, J. (1992). Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R. S. (1991). The attachment bond in childhood and adulthood. In Parkes, C. M., Hinde, J. S., and Marris, P. (eds.), Attachment Across the Life Cycle. Tavistock Institute, New York. Wintre, M. G., and Crowley, J. (1993). The adolescent self concept: A functional determinant of consultant preference. J. Youth Adolesc. 22: 1—15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wintre, M. G., Yaffe, M., and Crowely, J. (1995). Perception of parental reciprocity scale (POPRS): Development and validation with adolescents and young adults. Soc. Dev. 4: 129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youniss, J., and Smollar, J. (1985). Adolescent Relations With Mother, Father and Friends. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freeman, H., Brown, B.B. Primary Attachment to Parents and Peers during Adolescence: Differences by Attachment Style. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 30, 653–674 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012200511045

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012200511045

Keywords

Navigation