Skip to main content
Log in

Policy convergence and policy feedback: Agricultural finance policies in a globalizing era

  • Published:
European Journal of Political Research

Abstract

In a comparative study of five countries: Australia, Canada, the Republic of Ireland, the UK, and the USA, this article examines the degree of convergence of agricultural credit policy content, policy instruments, and policy outcomes on a market liberal model. It shows that all five countries have moved toward market liberal policy arrangements over the past quarter century of globalizing and domestic fiscal pressures, but important differences in policy remain. The Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom move further toward a market liberal model than do Australia, Canada, and the USA. The distinct national paths taken to market liberalism give rise to policy feedback that hastens or retards the adoption of a fully market liberal system. Historical choices of policy instruments and path dependence help account for continuing policy divergence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atwood, E. A. (1983). Financing and investment in Irish agriculture, Irish Banking Review, December 1983.

  • Australia, Commission of Inquiry into the Australian Financial System (1981), Final Report. Canberra: AGPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, C. (1991). What is Policy Convergence and What Causes it?, British Journal of Political Science 21: 215–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolz, M., Lösch, R. & Meimberg, R. (1993). Agrarkreditsysteme in der Europäischen Union. Frankfurt aM: Landwirtschaftliche Rentenbank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canada, Farm Credit Corporation (1979). The development of farm credit in Canada. Ottawa: FCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerny, P. (1993). The deregulation and re-regulation of financial markets in a more open world, in Cerny (ed.), Finance and world politics: Markets, regimes and states in the post-hegemonic era. Aldershot, Hants: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, W. D. (1996). Financial services, globalization, and domestic policy change: A comparison of North America and the European Union. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, W. D., Atkinson, M. & Montpetit, E. (1997). 'Against the odds': Retrenchment in Agriculture in France and the United States, World Politics 49: 453–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, W. D., Skogstad, G. & Atkinson, M. (1996). Paradigm shifts and policy networks: Cumulative change in agriculture, Journal of Public Policy 16: 273–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, W. D. & Skogstad, G. (1995). Neo-liberalism, policy networks, and policy change, Australian Journal of Political Science 30: 242–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, N. (1995). Agricultural policy networks of the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland, Political Studies 43: 664–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooney, S. (1988). Irish agriculture: An organisational profile. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feick, J. (1992). Comparing comparative policy studies: A path towards integration?, Journal of Public Policy 12: 257–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouilleux, È . (1996). La cogestion à la Française à l'épreuve de l'Europe: L'exemple de la réforme de la Politique Agricole Commune. Grenoble: CERAT-IEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freshwater, D. (1989). The political economy of farm credit reform: The Agricultural Credit Act of 1987, in C. S. Kramer (ed.), The political economy of US agriculture: Challenges for the 1990s. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freshwater, D. & Riemenschneider, C. (1994). Is a revised mandate for the Farm Credit System Needed? Staff paper No. 336, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky, October 1994.

  • Gifford, J. K., VivianWood, J., Reitsma, A. J. & Lougheed, A. L. (1967). Australian Banking, 5th edn. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, W. P. (1995). The limits of Common Agricultural Policy reform and the option of denationalization, Journal of European Public Policy 2: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, W.P. & MacNamara, A. (1995). When policy communities intersect: The case of agriculture and banking, Political Studies 43: 509–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, W. P. & MacNamara, A. (1994). Institutional exceptionalism and the provision of agricultural credit in England and Ireland.Working paper No. 119, Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Warwick.

  • Green, G. P. (1987). Finance capital and uneven development. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, D. E. (1991). From New Day to New Deal: American farm policy from Hoover to Roosevelt, 1928- 1933. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ives, W. (1987). The Primary Industry Bank of Australia Ltd., 1978- 1984. Sydney: PIBA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, S., Flavel, N. & Gargett, D. (1983). Characteristics of rural adjustment scheme applicants, Quarterly Review of the Rural Economy 5: 371–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, T. J. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics and choice, Public Administration Review 32: 298–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, T., Whatmore, S. & Munton, R. (1990). The role of Banking Capital and Credit Relations in British Agriculture, in T. Marsden & J. Little (eds.), Political, social and economic perspectives on the international food system. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslen, G, (1993). Changes to the rural adjustment scheme. unpublished.

  • Musgrave, W: (1990). Rural adjustment, in D. B. Williams (ed.), Agriculture in the Australian economy, 3rd edn. Sydney: Sydney University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1970). Capital and finance in agriculture, 2 vols. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1991). Ministerial principles for policy reform, Agricultural markets and trade, monitoring and outlook 1991. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peoples, K. L., Freshwater, D., Hanson, G. D., Prentice, P. T. & Thor, P. (1992). Anatomy of an American agricultural credit crisis: Farm debt in the 1980s. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the welfare state: Reagan, Thatcher and the politics of retrenchment. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change, World Politics 45: 595–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, E. (1996). The common agricultural policy, in H. Wallace & Wallace, W. (eds.), Policy-Making in the European Union, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (1991). Crisis and choice in European social democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schickele, R. (1978). Agricultural policy: Farm programs and national welfare. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogstad, G. (1990). The farm policy community and public policy in Ontario and Quebec, in W. D. Coleman & G. Skogstad (eds.), Policy Communities and Public Policy in Canada: A structural approach. Mississauga: Copp Clark Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillman, K. (1989). Horizons: A history of the Rural and Industries Bank of Western Australia. Nedlands: University of Western Australia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standen, B. J. (1982). Credit and agriculture, in D. B. Williams (ed.), Agriculture in the Australian economy, 2nd edn. Sydney: Sydney University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stent, W. R. (1981). The changing norms of Australian agricultural policy in the seventies, Journal of Australian Studies 9: 32–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, B. & van Waarden, F. (1995). Introduction: An interdisciplinary approach to convergence, in B. Unger & F. van Waarden (eds.), Convergence or diversity? Internationalization and economic policy response. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries (1926). Report on Agricultural Credit. Economic Series No. 8. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration (1985). A brief history of Farmers Home Administration. Washington, DC: USDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • US General Accounting Office (1992). Farmers Home Administration: Billions of dollars in farm loans are at risk. Washington, DC: USGAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Waarden, F. (1995). Persistence of national policy styles: A study of their institutional foundations, in B. Unger & F. van Waarden (eds.), Convergence or diversity? Internationalization and economic policy response. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A. (1989). Rural policies, in A. Patience & B. Head (eds.), From Whitlam to Fraser: Reform and reaction in Australian Politics. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zysman, J. (1994). Book review of Paulette Kurzer, iBusiness and Banking: Political Change and Economic Integration inWestern Europe [Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993], American Political Science Review 88: 802.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William D. Coleman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coleman, W.D., Grant, W.P. Policy convergence and policy feedback: Agricultural finance policies in a globalizing era. European Journal of Political Research 34, 225–247 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006949613716

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006949613716

Keywords

Navigation