Abstract
In this essay I respond to Quentin Smith's chargethat `the date-analysis version ofthe tenseless theory of time cannot give adequateaccounts of the truth conditions ofthe statements made by tensed sentence-tokens'(Smith 1999, 236). His argument isbased on an analysis of certain counterfactualsituations that is at odds with thedate-analysis account of language and hence succeedsonly in begging the questionagainst that theory. To anticipate: his argumentfails if one allows that temporalindexicals such as `now' rigidly designate theirtime of utterance, something thedate-analyst can happily admit whether she adheresto an absolute or relationalmetaphysics of time.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Craig, W. L.: 1999, ‘On Truth Conditions of Tensed Sentence Types’, Synthese 120, 265-270.
Davidson, D.: 1969, ‘The Individuation of Events’, in N. Rescher (ed.), Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel, D. Reidel, Boston, pp. 216-234.
Horwich, P.: 1987, Asymmetries in Time, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Kaplan, D.: 1989, ‘Demonstratives’, in J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein (eds), Themes from Kaplan, Oxford University Press, New York.
Kripke, S.: 1980, Naming and Necessity, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Mellor, D. H.: 1998, Real Time II, Routledge, London.
Mozersky, J. M.: 2000, ‘Tense and Temporal Semantics’, Synthese 124, 247-269.
Perry, J.: 1977, ‘Frege on Demonstratives’, The Philosophical Review 86, 474-497.
Price, H.: 1996, Time's Arrow and Archimedes' Point: New Directions for the Physics of Time, Oxford University Press, New York.
Smith, Q.: 1999, ‘The “Sentence-Type Version” of the Tenseless Theory of Time’, Synthese 119, 233-251
Smith, Q.: 1993, Language and Time, Oxford University Press, New York.
Smith, Q.: 1990, ‘Temporal Indexicals’, Erkenntnis 32, 5-25.
Smith, Q.: 1987, ‘Problems with the New Tenseless Theory of Time’, Philosophical Studies 52, 371-392.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mozersky, J.M. Smith On Times And Tokens. Synthese 129, 405–411 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013135211562
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013135211562