Skip to main content
Log in

Explanation as Unification

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Achinstein, P.: 1983, The Nature of Explanation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, W. P.: 1971, ‘The Place of the Explanation of Particular Facts in Science’, Philosophy of Science 38, 13–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartelborth, T.: 1996, Begründungsstrategien, Akademie Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromberger, S.: 1965, ‘An Approach to Explanation’, in R. Butler (ed.), Analytical Philosophy, Second Series, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 72–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R.: 1975, ‘Functional Analysis’, Journal of Philosophy 72, 741–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feigl, H.: 1970, ‘The Orthodox View of Theories: Remarks in Defense as well as Critique’, in: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. IV, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J.: 1981, ‘Probability and Explanation’, Synthese 48, 71–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1974, ‘Explanation and Scientific Understanding’, Journal of Philosophy 71, 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, P: 1980, ‘A Pragmatic Approach to Explanation’, Philosophy of Science 47, 404–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, P.: 1988, Knowledge in Flux, MIT, Cambridge/Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünbaum, A.: 1963, ‘Temporally Asymmetry Principle’, in Baumrin, B. (ed.), Philosophy of Science. The Delaware Seminar, Vol. I, J. Wiley, NewYork.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, B.: 1974, ‘Explanations-of-What?’, Mimeographed manuscript.

  • Hempel, C. G.: 1959, ‘The Logic of Functional Analysis’, reprinted in: Hempel (1965, 297–330).

  • Hempel, C. C.: 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G.: 1968, ‘Maximal Specifity and Lawlikeness in Probabilistic Explanation’, Philosophy of Science 35, 116–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. C.: 1977, ‘Nachwort 1976: Neuere Ideen zu den Problemen der statistischen Erklärung’, in: C. G. Hempel, Aspekte wissenschaftlicher Erklärung, W. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 98–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, P.: 1981, ‘Aleatory Explanation’, Synthese 48, 225–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, P.: 1993, ‘Greater Unification Equals Greater Understanding?, Analysis 53, 183–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, R. C.: 1971, ‘Statistical Explanation vs. Statistical Relevance', in Salmon’, pp. 19–28.

  • Käsbauer, M.: 1976, ‘Definitionen der wissenschaftlichen Erklärung’, Erkenntnis 10, 255–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1981, ‘Explanatory Unification’, Philosophy of Science 48, 507–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1989, ‘Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World’, in Kitcher/Salmon (eds., 1989), pp. 410–505.

  • Kitcher, P. and Salmon, W. (eds.): 1989, Scientific Explanation, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. XIII, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutschera, F. v.: 1972, Wissenschaftstheorie, Vol. I and II, W. Fink, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, K.: 1974, Knowledge, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk, H.: 1985, ‘Bemerkungen zur pragmatisch-epistemischen Wende in der wissenschaftstheoretischen Analyse der Ereigniserklärungen’, Erkenntnis 22, 461–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mach, E.: 1883 [1973], Die Mechanik, Wissenschatliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, M.: 1990, ‘Unification, Realism and Inference’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41, 305–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neander, K.: 1991, ‘Functions as Selected Effects: The Conceptual Analyst's Defense’, Philosophy of Science 58, 168–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1981, ‘Statistical Explanation Reconsidered’, Synthese 48, 437–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1982, ‘Truthlikeness for Quantitative Statements’, PSA I, 208–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W.: 1971, Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W.: 1978, ‘Why ask ‘Why?’?’, Proc. Adr. Amer. Phil. Assoc. 51, 683–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon,W.: 1984, Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurz, G.: 1983, Wissenschaftliche Erklärung, dbv-Verlag der TU Graz, Graz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurz, G.: 1988, ‘Was ist wissenschaftliches Verstehen?’, in Schurz (ed., 1988), pp. 235–298.

  • Schurz, G. (ed.): 1988, Erklären und Verstehen in der Wissenschaft, R. Oldenbourg (Scientia Nova), Munich.

  • Schurz, G.: 1991, ‘Relevant Deduction’, Erkenntnis 35, 391–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurz, G.: 1995, ‘Scientific Explanation: A Critical Survey’, Foundation of Science I, 429–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurz, G./ Lambert, K.: 1994, ‘Outline of a Theory of Scientific Understanding’, Synthese 101, 65–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M.: 1959, ‘Truisms as the Grounds for Historical Explanation’, in P. Gardiner (ed.), Theories of History, New York, pp. 443–468.

  • Scriven, M.: 1962, ‘Explanation, Prediction and Laws’, in H. Feigl and O. Maxwell (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. III, University of Minnesota Press.

  • Sintonen, M.:1984, The Pragmatics of Explanation, Acta Philosophica Fennica 37, Helsinki.

  • Sperber, D. et al. (eds.): 1995, Causal Cognition, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W.: 1969, Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philosophie. Band I, Wissenschaftliche Erklärung und Begründung, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W.: 1983, Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philosophie. Band I: Erklärung – Begründung – Kausalität. Zweite verbesserte und erweiterte Auflage, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W.: 1986, Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philosophie. Band II. Dritter Teilband: Die Entwicklung des neuen Strukturalismus seit 1973, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P.: 1992, Conceptual Revolutions, Princeton University Press.

  • Tuomela, R.: 1980. ‘Explaining Explaining’, Erkenntnis 15, 211–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomela, R.: 1981, ‘Inductive Explanation’, Synthese 48, 257–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen, B.: 1980, The Scientific Image, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen, B.: 1985, ‘Salmon on Explanation’, Journal of Philosophy 11, 639–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whewell, W.: 1847, The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, 2nd edition, 2 Volumes, John W. Parker, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F.: 1985, Explanation, Causation, and Deduction, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, L.: 1976, Teleological Explanations, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schurz, G. Explanation as Unification. Synthese 120, 95–114 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005214721929

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005214721929

Keywords

Navigation