Skip to main content
Log in

Self-Diagnosis of Digital Systems

  • Published:
Automation and Remote Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Organization of distributed self-diagnosis of the components (modules and communication lines) of digital systems on the basis of the Barsi–Grandoni–Maestrini diagnostic model was described. It includes the following components: execution by an operable module of the functions of checking modules, determination of a path from one operable module to another operable module, and processing and decoding of the test results. For self-diagnosis of the failed components in a four-dimensional hypercube, two examples illustrating the distinctive features of the procedures were presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Buskens, R.W. and Bianchini, R.P., Distributed On-line Diagnosis in the Presence of Arbitrary Faults, Proc. 23rd Int. Symp. Fault Tolerant Comput., 1993, pp. 470-479.

  2. Vedeshenkov, V.A., On Organization of Self-diagnosable Digital Systems, Avtom. elemekh., 1983, no. 7, pp. 133-145.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hosseini, S.H., Kuhl, J.G., and Reddy, S.M., A Diagnosis Algorithm for Distributed Computing Systems with Dynamic Failure and Repair, IEEE Trans. Comput., 1984, vol. C-33, no.3, pp. 223-233.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bianchini, R., Jr., Goodwin, K., and Nydick, D.S., Practical Application and Implementation of Distributed System-level Diagnosis Theory, Proc. 20th Int. Symp. Fault Tolerant Comput., 1990, pp. 332-339.

  5. Bianchini, R., Jr. and Buskens R.W., An Adaptive Distributed System-level Diagnosis Algorithm and its Implementation, Proc. 21st Int. Symp. Fault Tolerant Comput., 1991, pp. 222-229.

  6. Preparata, F.P., Metze, G., and Chien, R.T., On the Connection Assignment Problem of Diagnosable Systems, IEEE Trans. Electr. Comput., 1967, vol. 16, no.6, pp. 848-854.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vedeshenkov, V.A., On the BGM Model-based Diagnosis of Failed Modules and Communication Lines in Digital Systems, Avtom. Telemekh., 2002, no. 2, pp. 159-171.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barsi, F., Grandoni, F., and Maestrini, P., A Theory of Diagnosability of Digital Systems, IEEE Trans. Comput., 1976, vol. C-25, no.6, pp. 585-593.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Parkhomenko, P.P., Checking Multiprocessor Computer Systems for Serviceability by Analyzing Their Syndrome Graphs, Avtom. Telemekh., 1999, no. 5, pp. 126-135.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Belov, V.V., Vorob'ev, E.M., and Shatalov, V.E., Teoriya grafov (Graph Theory), Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Parkhomenko, P.P., On System Diagnosis of the Vertex and Edge Hypercube Structures of the Multiprocessor Computer Systems, Avtom. Telemekh., 1996, no. 11, pp. 165-174.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Parkhomenko, P.P., Classification of the Hamiltonian Cycles in Binary Hypercubes, Avtom. Telemekh., 2001, no. 6, pp. 136-150.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vedeshenkov, V.A. Self-Diagnosis of Digital Systems. Automation and Remote Control 64, 1794–1809 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027338615533

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027338615533

Keywords

Navigation