Abstract
Disability rights activists and cultural workers are articulating disability identity and culture. Through interviews with lesbians and bisexual women with disabilities or chronic illnesses and their partners, the present study examined disability/chronic illness identity on the level of individual, couple, and community. Participants shared differing perspectives about how disability/chronic illness identity relates to other aspects of identity, and about whether disability/chronic illness identity is fluid or constant. They described several challenges they have encountered in developing disability/chronic illness identity. Couples talked about developing boundaries and balance in their relationships, and about how disability or chronic illness has strengthened their relationships. A number of participants spoke about identity as intimately linked with community. Implications for community building are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Crabtree, B. F. & Miller, W. L. (1992). A template approach to text analysis: Developing and using codebooks. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 93-109). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Cox, S. & Gallois, C. (1996). Gay and lesbian identity development: A social identity perspective. Journal of Homosexuality, 30(4), 1-30.
D'Auost, V. (1996). Which map is not whose territory? In S. Tremain (Ed.), Pushing the limits: Disabled dykes produce culture. Toronto: Women's Press, 154-163.
Feinberg, L. (1996). Transgender warriors: Making history from Joan of Arc to RuPaul. Boston: Beacon Press.
Hershey, L. (1993). Coming out in voices. In M. E. Willmuth and L. Holcomb (Eds.). Women with disabilities: Found voices. Hawthorn Press, pp. 9-17.
Ibrahim, F., Ohnishi, H., & Singh Sandu, D. (1997). Asian American identity development: A culture specific model for South Asian Americans. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 25, 34-50.
Johnson, M. (1987, January/February). Emotion and pride: The search for disability culture. The Disability Rag, 1, 4-10.
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Longmore, P. K. (1995, September/October). The second phase: From disability rights to disability culture. The Disability Rag and Resource, 4-11.
Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Turmansburg, NY: Crossing Press.
Moses, J. (1996). Connections. In S. Tremain (Ed.). Pushing the limits: Disabled dykes produce culture. Toronto: Women's Press. pp. 204-205.
Pastio, D. (1995, September/October). Identifying with our culture—ourselves. The Disability Rag and Resource, 11.
Patterson, J. M. & Garwick, A. W. (1994). Levels of meaning in family stress theory. Family Process, 33, 287-304.
Pegues, J. (1997). Strategies from the field: Organizing the Asian-American feminist movement. In S. Shah (Ed.), Dragon ladies: Asian-American feminists breathe fire, (pp. 3-16). Boston: South End.
Pegues, J. (1998, March). Building a broad-based social justice movement. Keynote presented at Outfront Conference, Minneapolis, MN.
Pride and identity: Part two of an interview with New York City Disabled in Action's Nadina LaSpina and Daniel Robert. (1998, March/April). Ragged Edge, 12-14.
Rolland, J. S. (1994). In sickness and in health: The impact of illness on couples' relationships. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 20(4), 327-347.
Tremain, S. (1996). We're here. We're disabled and queer. Get used to it. In S. Tremain (Ed.). Pushing the limits: Disabled dykes produce culture. Toronto: Women's Press. pp. 15-24.
Wade, C. M. (1994a, November/December). Creating a disability aesthetic in the arts. In The Disability Rag and Resource, 29-31.
Wade, C. M. (1994b, September/October). Identity. In The Disability Rag and Resource, 32-36.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Axtell, S. Disability and Chronic Illness Identity: Interviews with Lesbians and Bisexual Women and Their Partners. International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies 4, 53–72 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023254408084
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023254408084